ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1176

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Of Pegloticase In Patients With End-Stage Renal Failure Receiving Hemodialysis

Anthony J. Bleyer1, David E. Wright2 and Alan Glicklich3, 1Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 2Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA, 3Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Among the estimated 8.3 million adults in the US with gout, approximately 40% have coexistent chronic kidney disease (CKD).1,2 Further, the presence of gout in CKD appears to confer an increased risk for progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD).3 Thus, patients often proceed to dialysis with chronic gout, and some suffer from severe tophaceous gout. There has been little detailed study of the use of urate-lowering medications in the hemodialysis (HD) population. Pegloticase, a recombinant uricase conjugated to PEG, acts by converting urate to a soluble product (allantoin) that is readily excreted. Pegloticase is reserved for patients with chronic gout who are refractory to current oral urate-lowering treatments and does not require dose adjustment based on renal function. Here we present results from a Phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) / pharmacodynamic study of single-dose pegloticase in patients undergoing HD.

Methods: A single intravenous dose of pegloticase (8 mg) was administered over a 2-hour period to male or female (age 18-75 years) HD patients without gout (N=12), 3 hours prior to the Day 1 dialysis session; a second dialysis session was monitored on Day 4. Patients received prophylactic antihistamine and corticosteroid prior to pegloticase infusion. Blood samples were drawn predialysis and hourly over 4 hours postdialysis during the Day 1 and Day 4 sessions. The limit of detection for pegloticase was 0.6 μg/mL; all samples below this value were set to zero. Safety assessments included standard vital signs, laboratory testing, and adverse event (AE) determinations.

Results: Following a single dose of pegloticase started approximately 3 hours prior to HD, the mean Cmax was 3.27 μg/mL (arterial) and 4.00 μg/mL (venous). Pegloticase AUC3-7h was 9.86 h∙μg/mL (arterial) and 12.91 h∙μg/mL (venous) at the Day 1 dialysis and for the Day 4 dialysis AUC72-76h was 7.93 h∙μg/mL (arterial) and 9.70 h∙μg/mL (venous). Mean arterial and venous pegloticase concentrations during the Day 1 and Day 4 dialysis sessions are shown in the figure. Baseline mean serum uric acid in this non-gout population was 5.98 mg/dL; by 3 hours postinfusion, serum uric acid was undetectable and remained so over the 72-hour sampling period. One patient reported an AE of headache that was possibly related to study drug.

Conclusion: In a small cohort of patients with ESRD and no evidence of gout, pegloticase concentration was not affected by a first HD session and displayed stable decline during a second HD session. Serum uric acid levels in this cohort fell to nondetectable levels 3 hours postinfusion confirming that patients with ESRD can achieve urate-lowering with pegloticase. Data presented here support the use of pegloticase in patients with chronic gout undergoing HD.

References:

1. Fuldeore et al. BMC Nephrol. 2011.

2. Zhu et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2011.

3. Yu et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012.

figure


Disclosure:

A. J. Bleyer,
None;

D. E. Wright,

Savient Pharmaceutical, Inc,

3;

A. Glicklich,

Savient Pharmaceuticals , Inc.,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pharmacokinetics-and-pharmacodynamics-of-pegloticase-in-patients-with-end-stage-renal-failure-receiving-hemodialysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology