ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1458

Clinical Efficacy of Bimekizumab Treatment up to 2 Years Across Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Varying Baseline Joint Involvement: Results from a Post Hoc Analysis of Two Pooled Phase 3 Studies

Philip J. Mease1, Laure Gossec2, Hideto Kameda3, David Nicholls4, Proton Rahman5, Barbara Ink6, Rajan Bajracharya6, Patrick Healy7 and Laura Coates8, 1Department of Rheumatology, Providence-Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Sorbonne Universite and Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France, 3Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan, 4Clinical Trials Unit, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia, 5Division of Rheumatology, Craig L. Dobbin Genetics Research Centre, Discipline of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada, 6UCB, Slough, England, United Kingdom, 7UCB, Morrisville, NC, 8Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, Inflammation, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1434–1466) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Patients (pts) in PsA clinical trials often have greater joint involvement than in the clinical setting due to trial inclusion criteria,1 thus it is important to assess treatment efficacy in pts with varying degrees of joint involvement. We investigated the efficacy of bimekizumab (BKZ), a selective inhibitor of interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A, in subgroups of pts with varying joint involvement at baseline (BL), using data pooled from two phase 3 studies.

Methods: Post hoc analysis assessed subcutaneous BKZ 160 mg every 4 weeks (wks; Q4W) in pts with PsA and varying BL joint involvement. Pts were grouped by BL swollen joint count (SJC); thresholds defined based on quartile boundaries at BL (SJC ≤5 / 6–≤7 / 8–≤12 / >12). Due to small pt numbers with 3/4 SJC at BL, pts with 5 SJC were included in the first quartile; pt numbers in each quartile therefore vary.Pts were pooled from the BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; biologic DMARD [bDMARD]-naïve) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; TNF inhibitor inadequate response/intolerance [TNFi-IR]) trials. As trials were different sizes (BE OPTIMAL 431 BKZ, 281 PBO; BE COMPLETE 267 BKZ, 133 PBO), proportions of bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR pts are not equal per quartile. Inclusion criteria for each trial included ≥3 tender and swollen joints. Both had a 16-wk double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled period. Pts completing Wk 52 of BE OPTIMAL or Wk 16 of BE COMPLETE could enter BE VITAL (NCT04009499; open-label extension), in which all pts received BKZ. BE OPTIMAL included a reference arm (adalimumab 40 mg Q2W); data not reported due to small pt numbers in SJC quartiles.Outcomes reported: ACR ≥50% improvement, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% improvement, minimal disease activity, SJC=0, Pain visual analog scale ≥50/70% improvement from BL, Health Assessment Questionnaire – Disability Index minimal clinically important difference (≥0.35 decrease from BL in pts with BL score ≥0.35). Data are pooled across both trials (non-responder imputation; observed case). Data are reported by randomization group at Wk 16, Year 1 (Wk 52), and Year 2 (pooled Wk 104/100 from BE OPTIMAL/BE COMPLETE).

Results: At BL, 370 pts had SJC ≤5, 215 had 6–≤7, 275 had 8–≤12, and 252 had >12. Demographic and disease characteristics by BL SJC are presented in the Table.At Wk 16, BKZ-treated pts demonstrated numerically greater improvements in joint, skin, composite, and patient-reported outcomes vs PBO, across pts with varying BL joint involvement. For all domains assessed, improvements were sustained to 2 years in BKZ-randomized pts, with robust efficacy across pts with varying BL joint involvement (Figure 1–2). For pts who switched from PBO to BKZ at Wk 16, improvements in efficacy similar to BKZ-randomized pts with varying BL joint involvement were reported to Year 1 and sustained to Year 2.

Conclusion: In pts with PsA and varying BL joint involvement, BKZ treatment demonstrated greater improvements vs PBO across disease domains at Wk 16, and improvements were sustained to 2 years. Robust efficacy was observed across all groups of pts with varying BL joint involvement, reflecting the broader range of pts seen in clinical practice.References: 1. Alle G. J Rheum 2025;52:138–44.

Supporting image 1Table. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics, reported by baseline joint involvement

Supporting image 2Figure 1. (A) ACR50, (B) PASI100, (C) MDA, and (D) SJC=0 responders at Week 16, Year 1, and Year 2, reported by baseline joint involvement (NRI, OC)

Supporting image 3Figure 2. (A) Pain50, (B) Pain70, and (C) HAQ-DI MCID responders at Week 16, Year 1, and Year 2, reported by baseline joint involvement (NRI, OC)


Disclosures: P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, Century, 2, Cullinan, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Inmagene, 2, J&J Innovative Medicine, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sana, 5, Spyre, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6; L. Gossec: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 5, BMS, 2, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2, 5; H. Kameda: AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., 2, 5, 6, BMS, 6, Eisai, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, 6, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, Taisho, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 6; D. Nicholls: AbbVie, 1, 5, 6, AstraZeneca, 1, 6, BMS, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Gilead, 5, Incannex, 5, Janssen, 1, 5, 6, Novartis, 1, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 5, 6, Sandoz, 1, 6, Servatus, 5, Sun Pharma, 5, UCB, 1, 5, 6; P. Rahman: Abbott, 2, AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, BMS, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2; B. Ink: AbbVie, 11, GSK, 11, UCB, 3, 11; R. Bajracharya: UCB, 3, 11; P. Healy: UCB, 3, 11; L. Coates: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Domain, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease P, Gossec L, Kameda H, Nicholls D, Rahman P, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Healy P, Coates L. Clinical Efficacy of Bimekizumab Treatment up to 2 Years Across Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Varying Baseline Joint Involvement: Results from a Post Hoc Analysis of Two Pooled Phase 3 Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-efficacy-of-bimekizumab-treatment-up-to-2-years-across-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-and-varying-baseline-joint-involvement-results-from-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-two-pooled-phase-3-studies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-efficacy-of-bimekizumab-treatment-up-to-2-years-across-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-and-varying-baseline-joint-involvement-results-from-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-two-pooled-phase-3-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology