ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1455

Sonelokimab in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Are Naive to Biologic DMARDs: Phase 2 ARGO Analysis and Phase 3 IZAR-1 Study Design

Philip J. Mease1, Laure Gossec2, Atul Deodhar3, Xenofon Baraliakos4, Frank Behrens5, Joseph F Merola6, Lihi Eder7, Ana-Maria Orbai8, Andreas Ramming9, Iain McInnes10, Alexis Ogdie11, Dennis McGonagle12, Christopher Ritchlin13, Nuala Brennan14, Ben Porter-Brown14, Eva Cullen14, Matthew R. Thomas14, Marius Albulescu14, Alex Godwood14, Kristian Reich15 and Laura Coates16, 1Department of Rheumatology, Providence-Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Sorbonne Universite and Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France, 3Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 4Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany, 5Rheumatology, Immunology - Inflammation Medicine, University Hospital Goethe-University & Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 6Department of Dermatology and Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 7University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 9Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology & Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-University (FAU) & Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany, 10University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 11University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 12Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 13University of Rochester Medical Center, Canandaigua, NY, 14MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, Zug, Switzerland, 15MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG and Translational Research in Inflammatory Skin Diseases, Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, Zug, Switzerland, 16Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: American College of Rheumatology Criteria, clinical trial, Outcome measures, Psoriatic arthritis, Randomized Trial

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1434–1466) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Sonelokimab (SLK), a novel Nanobody that binds to both IL-17A and IL-17F with similarly high affinity, is designed to target difficult-to-reach sites of inflammation due to its small size and albumin-binding domain. ARGO was a Phase 2 trial of SLK in active PsA, which met its primary endpoint of ACR50 vs. placebo at Week (W) 12 for SLK 60mg and 120mg (with induction [WI]). Here, we report W24 data in the ARGO trial from a subset of patients naive to bDMARDs (prior biologic use was a stratification factor). We also describe the design of the Phase 3 IZAR-1 trial, which will further evaluate SLK 60mg WI and SLK 60mg with no induction (NI) in this patient population.

Methods: ARGO (NCT05640245) was a 24-week, global, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of adults with active PsA (TJC68 ≥3 and SJC66 ≥3). Three SLK doses were assessed: 60mg NI (Q4W), SLK 60mg WI, and SLK 120mg WI (induction doses at W0, 2, 4, and 6; Q4W from W8). In this exploratory analysis, we assessed outcomes at W24 in patients without prior bDMARD exposure treated with SLK 60mg with or without induction (IZAR-1 doses).

Results: Of the 207 patients enrolled in ARGO (Table), 171 patients (82.6%) were naive to bDMARDs. SLK 60mg resulted in clinical responses at W24 in patients naive to bDMARDs (SLK 60mg WI, n=34; SLK 60mg NI, n=33), including ACR50 (SLK 60mg WI: 61.8%; SLK 60mg NI: 63.6%), the higher threshold of ACR70 (SLK 60mg WI: 41.2%; SLK 60mg NI: 45.5%), and the composite endpoint of minimal disease activity ([MDA]; SLK 60mg WI: 58.8%; SLK 60mg NI: 48.5%). For patients naive to bDMARDs with skin involvement (SLK 60mg WI, n=22; SLK 60mg NI, n=28), treatment with SLK resulted in notable PASI 90 (SLK 60mg WI: 81.8%; SLK 60mg NI: 67.9%) and PASI 100 responses (SLK 60mg WI: 68.2%; SLK 60mg NI: 57.1%). SLK was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with IL-17 inhibition. Based on these findings, we have designed a 52-week, global, randomized, double-blind, PBO‑controlled, Phase 3 trial in this patient population (IZAR-1; NCT06641076; Figure). An estimated 960 patients will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive SLK 60mg Q4W WI, SLK 60mg Q4W NI, or PBO (SLK 60mg WI from W16). Given the results from ARGO, this sample size should provide sufficient power to demonstrate a statistically significant difference for each SLK arm vs. PBO on the primary outcome of ACR50 at W16. Eligible participants will have a confirmed diagnosis of PsA (CASPAR criteria), active disease (TJC68 ≥3; SJC66 ≥3), currently active or dermatologist-confirmed historical psoriasis, inadequate response to ≥1 conventional DMARD, and ≥1 erosion on hands-and-feet X-ray or hs-CRP > the ULN. Key secondary outcomes (all vs. PBO at W16) include ACR20, PASI 90, and MDA; the PROs HAQ-DI and SF-36 Physical Component Summary; and radiographic progression (vdH-mTSS).

Conclusion: The Phase 2 ARGO study demonstrated high levels of clinical response with SLK, including in patients with active PsA naive to bDMARDs. The randomized Phase 3 IZAR-1 study will further assess outcomes with SLK in patients naive to bDMARDs and is actively recruiting, including at sites across the USA.

Supporting image 1Table. Baseline characteristics from the ARGO trial

Supporting image 2Figure. Study design


Disclosures: P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, Century, 2, Cullinan, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Inmagene, 2, J&J Innovative Medicine, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sana, 5, Spyre, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6; L. Gossec: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 5, BMS, 2, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2, 5; A. Deodhar: BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, J&J, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; X. Baraliakos: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid Instructor, Advanz, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Alexion, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Alphasigma, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Amgen, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, BMS, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Celgene, 6, Celltrion, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Cesas, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Chugai, 2, 6, Clarivate, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Galapagos, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, J&J, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Merck, 6, MoonLake, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid instructor, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Peervoice, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Pfizer, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Roche, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Sandoz, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Springer, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Stada, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Takeda, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, UCB, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Zuellig, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor; F. Behrens: AbbVie, 2, 6, 12, Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Acelyrin, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 6, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, 2, 5, 6, Cilag, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 5, Sandoz, 6, UCB, 2, 6, 12, Support for attending meetings and/or travel; J. Merola: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Dermavant, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, LEO Pharma, 2, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi-Regeneron, 2, 5, Sun Pharma, 5, UCB, 2, 5; L. Eder: AbbVie, 1, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 1, 2, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 1, 5, J&J, 1, 2, 5, Janssen, 1, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, UCB, 1, 2, 5; A. Orbai: AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, BMS, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2; A. Ramming: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Johnson & Johnson, 2, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 2, 5, Novartis Pharma GmbH, 2, UCB, 2; I. McInnes: AbbVie, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 5, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, 6, Cabaletta, 2, 6, Causeway Therapeutics, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 6, Evelo, 2, Gilead, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, Sanofi/Regeneron, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; A. Ogdie: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 11, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, CorEvitas, LLC, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Forward Databank, 5, Gilead, 1, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Kopa/Twill Health, 2, NIH/NIAMS, National Psoriasis Foundation, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 11, Pfizer, 2, 5, 11, Rheumatology Research Foundation, 5, Spyre, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, University of Pennsylvania, 5; D. McGonagle: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Merck, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sobi, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 6; C. Ritchlin: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, MoonLake Pharma, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Solara, 2, UCB, 2; N. Brennan: MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 3, 11; B. Porter-Brown: MoonLake Immunotherapetics, 3, 11, Sanofi, 3, 11; E. Cullen: MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 3, 11; M. Thomas: MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 3, 11; M. Albulescu: MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 3, 11; A. Godwood: MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 3, 11; K. Reich: AbbVie, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Almirall, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Amgen, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Eli Lilly, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Galderma, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Janssen-Cilag, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Kyowa Kirin, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, LEO Pharma, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Medac, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 3, 11, Novartis, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials, Ocean Pharma, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials, Pfizer, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials, Sanofi, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials, UCB, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials; L. Coates: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Domain, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease P, Gossec L, Deodhar A, Baraliakos X, Behrens F, Merola J, Eder L, Orbai A, Ramming A, McInnes I, Ogdie A, McGonagle D, Ritchlin C, Brennan N, Porter-Brown B, Cullen E, Thomas M, Albulescu M, Godwood A, Reich K, Coates L. Sonelokimab in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Are Naive to Biologic DMARDs: Phase 2 ARGO Analysis and Phase 3 IZAR-1 Study Design [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sonelokimab-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-who-are-naive-to-biologic-dmards-phase-2-argo-analysis-and-phase-3-izar-1-study-design/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sonelokimab-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-who-are-naive-to-biologic-dmards-phase-2-argo-analysis-and-phase-3-izar-1-study-design/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology