ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1440

Comparison of standard and tapered dose of biologic treatments in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

MÜSLÜM FIRAT İKİKARDEŞ1, EMRAH KOÇ1, gEZMIS KIMYON2, EMİNE DUYGU ERSOZLU1 and TAYYIBE SALER1, 1ADANA SEHİR HASTANESİ, ADANA, Turkey, 2MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY, HATAY, Turkey

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Anti-TNF Drugs

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1434–1466) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: We aimed to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients with axial spondyloarthritis (aSpA) receiving standard-dose versus tapered-dose biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD).

Methods: The patients with aSpA who visited the rheumatology outpatient clinics at our hospital between 1 October 2017 and 31 October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient’s data were collected between 1 December 2023 and 30 November 2024. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were compared between groups.

Results: A total of 251 patients were included in the study, with 105 patients in bDMARD tapered dose group (TDG) and 146 patients in standard dose group (SDG). Compared to SDG, there were more male patients in the TDG (75.2% vs. 57.5%, p=0.004). In the TDG, lower rates of obesity (27.6% vs. 47.9%, p=0.001), chronic disease (55.2% vs. 68.5%, p=0.032), fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) (1.9% vs. 10.3%, p=0.009), ≥3 different bDMARDs usage (4,8% vs 26%, p=0,000), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug usage (23,8% vs 48,6%, p=0,000) were found. The TDG had a longer disease duration (median: 152 vs. 130 months, p=0.009), lower erythrocyte sedimentation rate (median: 5 mm/h vs. 8 mm/h, p=0.000), C-reactive protein (median: 3,1 mg/L vs 4,05 mg/L, p=0,033), current ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score-C-reactive protein level (median: 1.2 vs. 1.7, p=0.000), and a higher remission rate (87.6% vs. 58.2%, p=0.000). The most frequently used bDMARD in the TDG was etanercept (31,4%, 25 mg and 50 mg forms), and the second most commonly used was golimumab (%21,9). Compared to other bDMARDs, maintenance duration at the tapered dose of etanercept was longer (median: 102 vs 61 months, p=0.002).

Conclusion: bDMARD tapering was more frequently performed in male patients who do not have obesity, chronic diseases, or FMS. Etanercept was a drug that was most commonly tapered.

Supporting image 1Figure 1: Flowchart of the study population selection

Supporting image 2Table 1: Comparison of baseline characteristics between the tapered-dose and standard-dose groups

Supporting image 3Table 2: Dose, dosing interval, time to dose tapering, duration of treatment at the tapered dose, and total treatment duration of the current bDMARD in patients from the tapered-dose group


Disclosures: M. İKİKARDEŞ: None; E. KOÇ: None; g. KIMYON: None; E. ERSOZLU: None; T. SALER: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

İKİKARDEŞ M, KOÇ E, KIMYON g, ERSOZLU E, SALER T. Comparison of standard and tapered dose of biologic treatments in patients with axial spondyloarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-standard-and-tapered-dose-of-biologic-treatments-in-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-standard-and-tapered-dose-of-biologic-treatments-in-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology