ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1430

Redefining BASDAI cut-offs: implications for patients’ eligibility for initiating biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic treatment in axial spondyloarthritis

Stylianos Georgiadis1, Lykke Ørnbjerg1, Brigitte Michelsen2, Tore K. Kvien2, Mehrdad Shoae Kazemi1, Bente Glintborg1, Anne Gitte Loft3, Rita Fonseca4, Helena Santos5, Andreas Reich6, Anne C. Regierer6, Jarno Rutanen7, Laura Kuusalo8, Gary Macfarlane9, Gareth T. Jones9, Adrian Ciurea10, Michael J. Nissen11, Bjorn Gudbjornsson12, Olafur Palsson13, Ziga Rotar14, Katja Perdan Pirkmajer15, Daniela Di Giuseppe16, Merete Hetland17 and Mikkel Ostergaard18, 1Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark, 2Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 4Unidade Local de Saúde de Entre Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal, 5Instituto Português de Reumatologia, Lisbon, Portugal, 6German Rheumatology Research Center, Berlin, Germany, 7Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland, 8Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland, 9University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 10University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 11Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland, 12Landspitali University Hospital; Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, 13University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, 14University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ziri, Slovenia, 15University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 16Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine Solna, Clinical Epidemiology Division, Stockholm, Stockholms Lan, Sweden, 17Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE) and DANBIO, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 18Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biologicals, Disease Activity, Outcome measures, spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1405–1433) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: In patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), high disease activity is a key indication for biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) initiation. The Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) criterion (ASDAS≥2.1) is recommended for defining high disease activity, but the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) criterion (BASDAI≥4) can be used if ASDAS is unavailable [1]. We aimed to compare a newly proposed BASDAI cut-off for high disease activity (BASDAI≥2.5) [2] with ASDAS≥2.1 as an eligibility criterion for bDMARD initiation.

Methods: Prospectively collected real-world data from registries participating in the European Spondyloarthritis (EuroSpA) collaboration were analysed. Patients with axSpA initiating a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor or an interleukin-17A inhibitor as their first bDMARD between 2015 and 2023 were included. Analyses were limited to patients who had complete data on ASDAS and BASDAI at baseline and had attended a 6-month visit. Patients were categorised into 4 subgroups according to baseline ASDAS (≥2.1) and BASDAI (≥2.5) cut-offs for high disease activity. Treatment effect was assessed at 6 months by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) response measures (ASAS20 and ASAS40). Logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the achievement of treatment effect according to the ASDAS (≥2.1) and BASDAI (≥2.5) cut-offs for high disease activity.

Results: We analysed data from 6,329 patients with axSpA from 9 European registries. Most patients (n=5,753; 91%) fulfilled both ASDAS (≥2.1) and BASDAI (≥2.5) eligibility criteria at baseline, while 243 (4%) patients fulfilled neither of them (Table 1). The number of patients fulfilling either ASDAS or BASDAI criterion alone were 161 (3%) and 172 (3%), respectively. Baseline patient characteristics in the overall cohort and in subgroups are presented in Table 1. The subgroup fulfilling both eligibility criteria demonstrated the highest ASAS20 and ASAS40 responses at 6 months (68% and 52%, respectively) (Table 2). Among patients who only fulfilled the ASDAS or BASDAI criterion alone, similar ASAS20 (37% and 39%) and ASAS40 (17% and 15%) responses were achieved. The results of the regression analyses showed that fulfilling either ASDAS or BASDAI criterion was significantly associated with achieving ASAS20 and ASAS40 responses (Figure 1). When both criteria were included in the regression analyses, ASDAS≥2.1 and BASDAI≥2.5 were positive predictors of treatment effect at 6 months.

Conclusion: In a multinational European cohort, similar numbers of patients were eligible for treatment with bDMARDs when applying either ASDAS≥2.1 or BASDAI≥2.5 as the eligibility criterion. Patients with ASDAS≥2.1 and BASDAI≥2.5 demonstrated the best response to bDMARD treatment. These findings support the use of BASDAI≥2.5 as an indication for biologic treatment in axSpA, particularly when ASDAS is not available. References1. Ramiro et al. (2023). Ann Rheum Dis, 82(1), 19-34.2. Georgiadis et al. (2025). Under review.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics in overall cohort and in subgroups according to baseline ASDAS and BASDAI cut-off values for high disease activity

Supporting image 2Table 2. Treatment effect at 6 months in overall cohort and in subgroups according to baseline ASDAS and BASDAI cut-off values for high disease activity

Supporting image 3Figure 1. Forest plots of odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for achieving ASAS 20 and ASAS40 at 6 months derived by logistic regression models including I. ASDAS criterion alone, II. BASDAI critetion alone, and III. both ASDAS and BASDAI criteria. Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for sex, age and GDP per capita (1,000$), as a proxy for socio-economic status of registries. ASAS: Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society; ASDAS: Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score based on CRP; BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.


Disclosures: S. Georgiadis: Novartis, 5, UCB, 5; L. Ørnbjerg: Novartis, UCB, 5; B. Michelsen: Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 5; T. Kvien: Abbvie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Celltrion, 2, Galapagos, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, Grünenthal, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sandoz, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; M. Shoae Kazemi: None; B. Glintborg: alfasigma, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Pfizer, 5, Sandoz, 5; A. Loft: Janssen, 6, UCB, 1, 6; R. Fonseca: None; H. Santos: Abbvie, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Janssen, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6; A. Reich: None; A. Regierer: Amgen, 6, Pharma Deutschland, 6; J. Rutanen: None; L. Kuusalo: None; G. Macfarlane: None; G. Jones: Amgen, 5, Pfizer, 5, Shionogi, 5, UCB, 6; A. Ciurea: None; M. Nissen: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 12, Payment to institution, Amgen, 2, 12, Payment to institution, Eli Lilly, 2, 12, Payment to institution, Janssen, 2, 6, 12, Support for conference participation. Payment to institution, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, 12, Payment to institution, Pfizer, 2, 12, Payment to institution, UCB, 2, 12, Support for conference participation. Payment to institution; B. Gudbjornsson: None; O. Palsson: None; Z. Rotar: None; K. Perdan Pirkmajer: None; D. Di Giuseppe: None; M. Hetland: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 5, Alfasigma, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, Sandoz, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6; M. Ostergaard: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, BMS, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, MEDAC, 6, Merck, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Sandoz, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Georgiadis S, Ørnbjerg L, Michelsen B, Kvien T, Shoae Kazemi M, Glintborg B, Loft A, Fonseca R, Santos H, Reich A, Regierer A, Rutanen J, Kuusalo L, Macfarlane G, Jones G, Ciurea A, Nissen M, Gudbjornsson B, Palsson O, Rotar Z, Perdan Pirkmajer K, Di Giuseppe D, Hetland M, Ostergaard M. Redefining BASDAI cut-offs: implications for patients’ eligibility for initiating biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic treatment in axial spondyloarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/redefining-basdai-cut-offs-implications-for-patients-eligibility-for-initiating-biologic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-treatment-in-axial-spondyloarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/redefining-basdai-cut-offs-implications-for-patients-eligibility-for-initiating-biologic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-treatment-in-axial-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology