ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1270

Increasing Participation in the FT819 Cell Therapy Trial Amongst People Living with Lupus: A Focus Group Study

Joy Buie1, Safoah Agyemang1, Andrew Henry2, Andrew BitMansour3, Vaneet Sandhu4, Debra Zack5 and Michael Fisher1, 1Lupus Foundation of America, Washington, DC, 2Fate Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, 3Fate Therapeutics, Inc., San Carlos, CA, 4Fate Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, 5Fate Therapeutics, San Diego

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, Qualitative Research, race/ethnicity, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1248–1271) Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Clinical trials exploring the safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for lupus are growing. Challenges linked to recruitment for CAR T-cell clinical trials are likely multifactorial and may include barriers at the healthcare system, provider, and patient level. The aim of this study was to elicit qualitative feedback from people living with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who have the greatest burden of disease to understand attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors related to CAR T-cell therapy clinical trials, specifically the Fate Therapeutics FT819 product.

Methods: A focus group was conducted among people with SLE recruited via the Lupus Foundation of America’s Research Accelerated by You (RAY) Registry. Researchers queried RAY for individuals thought to meet inclusion criteria and provided an online screener. Of 205 respondents, 23 were shortlisted based on response timing (5 business days) and alignment with a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria. Upon follow-up contact, 6 expressed interest and consented. Five attended a 2-hour virtual focus group in December 2025 via Zoom. Following a slide presentation describing FT819 therapy as an off-the-shelf (uniquely available on-demand) cell therapy with reduced patient burden such as hospitalization requirements, semi-structured questions covered: (1) background and journey to diagnosis and care, (2) general awareness and perceptions of cell therapy, (3) perceptions of FT819 therapy administration, (4) potential benefits and risks of receiving FT819 therapy within a clinical trial, and (5) perceptions and acceptability of follow-up and monitoring. The focus group was audio-video recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in Dedoose using content analysis methodology.

Results: Participants included 5 Black/African American female adults, one of whom also identified as Hispanic. All had active SLE affecting one or more major organ systems (Table 1). Results emerged across 3 categories: (1) Initial perceptions of cell therapy, (2) perceptions of FT819 therapy including benefits and concerns (Tables 2 and 3), and (3) willingness to participate in an FT819 trial and expected outcomes. Initial perceptions indicated participants were familiar with and optimistic about cell therapy but also had concerns. Regarding FT819 therapy, participants perceived benefits such as improved quality of life, potential for remission, and a relatively short hospital stay. Participants also expressed concerns about potential adverse reactions or side effects, chemotherapy or mycophenolate requirements, long-term effectiveness, time and travel, hospital care and quality, caregiver needs, and medication cost and coverage (upon FDA approval). Participants also commented on willingness to participate in an FT819 trial, definition of successful treatment, and required duration of clinical effect.

Conclusion: Clinical trials in the U.S. have often failed to include representative samples, leading to a lack of generalizability. This study identified barriers and facilitators to cell therapy trial participation among a purposive sample. The findings can guide activities such as patient engagement, recruitment, and site selection.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Participant Demographics

Supporting image 2Table 2. Perceived Benefits of FT819 Therapy

Supporting image 3Table 3. Concerns about FT819 Therapy


Disclosures: J. Buie: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, Fate Therapeutics, 1, Genentech, 1, Novartis, 1; S. Agyemang: None; A. Henry: Fate Therapeutics, Inc., 3; A. BitMansour: Fate Therapeutics, Inc., 3; V. Sandhu: Fate Therapeutics Inc, 3; D. Zack: Fate Therapeutics, 3; M. Fisher: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Buie J, Agyemang S, Henry A, BitMansour A, Sandhu V, Zack D, Fisher M. Increasing Participation in the FT819 Cell Therapy Trial Amongst People Living with Lupus: A Focus Group Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/increasing-participation-in-the-ft819-cell-therapy-trial-amongst-people-living-with-lupus-a-focus-group-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/increasing-participation-in-the-ft819-cell-therapy-trial-amongst-people-living-with-lupus-a-focus-group-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology