ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1224

Comparative Effectiveness of Duloxetine versus Pregabalin in Fibromyalgia: A Large-Scale, Real-World Study Across 300,000 Patients

Chukwuemelie Okeke1, Queeneth Edwards2, Ufuoma Mamoh3, Justin Riley Lam4 and Chekwubejah Uwakwe5, 1Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, 2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, 3Medstar Health Georgetown University Internal Medicine Residency Program, Baltimore, MD, 4Jefferson Einstein Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, 5Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria, Nnewi, Anambra, Nigeria

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Comorbidity, depression, Disparities, fibromyalgia, race/ethnicity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1221–1247) Pain in Rheumatic Disease Including Fibromyalgia Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic, debilitating condition characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and cognitive disturbances. Despite the availability of FDA-approved treatments, real-world comparative effectiveness data between duloxetine and pregabalin remain limited, particularly in diverse patient populations. Understanding which agent offers greater clinical durability and fewer adverse outcomes can inform personalized care in rheumatologic practice.This study aims to compare the real-world effectiveness, tolerability, and healthcare utilization associated with duloxetine and pregabalin among patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia using a large multicenter electronic health record database.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, encompassing over 144 healthcare organizations worldwide. Adult patients (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of fibromyalgia (ICD-10-CM: M79.7) who received either duloxetine (Cohort A: n = 194,834) or pregabalin (Cohort B: n = 114,556) were identified. Patients receiving both drugs were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1 greedy nearest-neighbor) adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, and baseline medication use. Primary outcome was treatment durability (time to discontinuation or switch) over 3 years. Secondary outcomes included pain-related ED visits, new-onset psychiatric diagnoses, and adverse event profiles.

Results: Post-matching, each cohort comprised 113,402 patients. Duloxetine demonstrated a significantly longer median time to treatment discontinuation (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.79–0.85; p < 0.001) and fewer discontinuation/switch events within 12 months (24.3% vs. 30.9%). Duloxetine users also had reduced pain-related ED visits (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.71–0.81), and lower incidence of new-onset anxiety/depression (p < 0.01). In contrast, pregabalin users reported fewer GI side effects but had higher risks of sedation and weight gain (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.29–1.39). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with pre-existing mood disorders benefited more from duloxetine, whereas pregabalin performed better in elderly populations and those with neuropathic comorbidities.

Conclusion: In one of the largest real-world analyses of fibromyalgia treatment to date, duloxetine was associated with superior treatment persistence, fewer acute care needs, and improved psychiatric outcomes compared to pregabalin. These results support a precision medicine approach in selecting pharmacologic therapy for FM and call for prospective trials targeting specific patient phenotypes to optimize treatment efficacy and tolerability.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Matched Fibromyalgia Patients Treated with Duloxetine vs. Pregabalin

Supporting image 2Table 2: Duloxetine (1) and Pregabalin (2) comparison


Disclosures: C. Okeke: None; Q. Edwards: None; U. Mamoh: None; J. Lam: None; C. Uwakwe: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Okeke C, Edwards Q, Mamoh U, Lam J, Uwakwe C. Comparative Effectiveness of Duloxetine versus Pregabalin in Fibromyalgia: A Large-Scale, Real-World Study Across 300,000 Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-duloxetine-versus-pregabalin-in-fibromyalgia-a-large-scale-real-world-study-across-300000-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-duloxetine-versus-pregabalin-in-fibromyalgia-a-large-scale-real-world-study-across-300000-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology