ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1203

Rituximab in Treatment Refractory vs Treatment Naive Anti-Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) Myositis – A Case Series

israrul haque1 and Parasar Ghosh2, 1Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research(IPGMER), KOLKATA, India, 2Dept of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, IPGMER & SSKM HospitalGovt of West Bengal, Kolkata, India, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biologicals, Myositis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1191–1220) Muscle Biology, Myositis & Myopathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Anti-Signal Recognition Particle (Anti-SRP) Myositis is a form of Polymyositis. Available consensus guidelines recommend initial combination therapy of high dose corticosteroids and Methotrexate and addition of Rituximab (RTX) within 6 months of starting therapy.

Methods: Objectives:1. Comparison of non-rituximab vs Rituximab therapy in treatment naïveAnti-SRP Myositis patients.2. Comparison of Rituximab in Treatment refractory vs Treatment naïveanti-SRP Myositis patients.Methods:It is a Single centre retrospective study. Patients satisfying EULAR/ACRclassification criteria for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy AND anti-SRPantibody in moderate to high titer were defined as cases. Patients withconcomitant presence of any other Myositis specific antibody (MSA) inmoderate to high titer were excluded. Complete remission (CR) was defined asMMT increase of≥ 20% 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑀𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑀𝑢𝑠𝑐𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 (𝑀𝑀𝑇 ― 8) ANDnormalisation of CPK while partial remission was defined as≥ 20% 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑀𝑀𝑇 ― 8 but elevated CPK ( >2 times of ULN). Patientwith ≥ 20% worsening in MMT from highest value and/or > 3 times increasein CPK from lowest value while on standard of care therapy were defined asrefractory cases.

Results: A total of 13 patients of SRP Myositis were included. Out of 13 cases-8 casesinitially received Immunosuppressants other than Rituximab (defined as initialnon-rituximab therapy group) while 5 cases initially received Rituximab(defined as initial Rituximab Therapy group). In initial non-rituximab therapygroup, 3 received Methotrexate, 2 received monthly Cyclophosphamidetherapy for 6 months, 2 received Mycophenolate Mofetil and 1 receivedAzathioprine. All 8 cases relapsed after Complete or partial remission duringfollow-up and met the criteria of refractory disease. Refractory patientsreceived Inj. Rituximab 1 gm two doses. In initial Rituximab therapy group casesreceived Rituximab 1 gm two doses and did not receive any other conventionalDMARD (C-DMARDs).

Conclusion: 1. Complete remission (CR) at 6 months is higher in initial rituximab therapygroup in treatment naïve anti-SRP Myositis patients. However, bothgroups showed similar improvement in MMT-8, reduction in CPK, andcorticosteroid dose reduction at 6 months after starting therapy.2. RTX therapy is equally effective at 6 months in treatment refractory andtreatment naïve patients in terms of improvement in MMT and reductionin CPK. Treatment-naïve patients had significantly greater corticosteroidneeds throughout the treatment period.

Supporting image 1Table: 1 Comparison of Initial Rituximab vs Initial non-Rituximab Therapy for

Treatment Naïve SRP Myositis Patients

Supporting image 2Table 2: Comparison of Rituximab Therapy in Treatment refractory and Treatment naive anti-SRP myositis patients.


Disclosures: i. haque: None; P. Ghosh: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

haque i, Ghosh P. Rituximab in Treatment Refractory vs Treatment Naive Anti-Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) Myositis – A Case Series [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rituximab-in-treatment-refractory-vs-treatment-naive-anti-signal-recognition-particle-srp-myositis-a-case-series/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rituximab-in-treatment-refractory-vs-treatment-naive-anti-signal-recognition-particle-srp-myositis-a-case-series/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology