ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1075

Racial Differences in Management and Clinical Outcomes of Giant-Cell Arteritis: A Real-World Propensity-Matched Study

Michael Hamilton1, Justin Riley Lam2, Emmanuel Otabor3, Laith Alomari3, Maxim Barnett3, Fabian Rodriguez Quinonez4 and Irene Tan5, 1Jefferson Einstein Hospital, Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 2Jefferson Einstein Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, 3Jefferson Einstein Hospital Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 4Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 5Einstein Healthcare Network Philadelphia - Jefferson Health, Bala Cynwyd, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disparities, giant cell arteritis, Outcome measures, race/ethnicity, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1055–1087) Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Posters

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Giant-cell arteritis (GCA) is usually described in people of Northern-European ancestry, and little is known about outcomes in Black and Hispanic (B-His) patients. Using a large U.S. multi-center electronic-health-record network, we compared clinical management and 1-year outcomes between White and B-His adults with GCA.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNet-X Global Collaborative Network. Adults (≥18 years) with an ICD-10 diagnosis of GCA were assigned to a White cohort or a B-His cohort based on electronic health records; individuals with mixed race/ethnicity were excluded. One-to-one propensity-score matching on age, sex, and 12 cardiovascular or metabolic comorbidities produced two balanced groups of 8323 patients each. Outcomes recorded 1–365 days after the index date were vision loss, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), temporal-artery biopsy, CT angiography, prednisone use, tocilizumab use, death, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) and Kaplan–Meier log-rank tests were used for comparisons.

Results: After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced (standardized differences < 0.05). Inflammatory activity was greater in B-His patients, whose mean CRP (24.5 mg/L vs 21.0 mg/L; p = 0.005) and ESR (40.1 mm/h vs 27.0 mm/h; p < 0.001) exceeded those of White patients. Temporal-artery biopsy was performed more often in B-His patients (22.6 % vs 17.8 %; RR 0.79, 0.74–0.84; p < 0.001), but vision-loss and CT-angiography frequencies were low (< 0.7 % and < 0.3 %, respectively) and did not differ. Prednisone exposure was equivalent in both groups (≈58 %), yet tocilizumab was prescribed nearly twice as often to White patients (5.1 % vs 2.8 %; RR 1.82, 1.56–2.13; p < 0.001). During follow-up period, stroke occurred in 3.5 % of B-His patients and 2.6 % of White patients (RR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.62–0.89; p = 0.002), while MI rates were similar (2.0 % vs 1.9 %). All-cause mortality, however, was higher in Whites (5.0 % vs 3.2 %; RR 1.53, 1.32–1.78; p < 0.001). Survival analysis confirmed lower stroke-free survival for B-His patients and lower overall survival for Whites.

Conclusion: In this large, propensity-matched real-world cohort, Black and Hispanic adults with GCA displayed higher inflammatory markers and greater stroke risk yet were less likely to receive tocilizumab than their White counterparts. Conversely, White patients had higher 1-year mortality despite comparable comorbidity burdens. These bidirectional disparities underscore the need for earlier recognition of vascular events in B-His patients and investigation into factors driving excess mortality among White patients. Tailored diagnostic vigilance and equitable access to advanced therapies are essential to optimize outcomes across racial and ethnic groups.


Disclosures: M. Hamilton: None; J. Lam: None; E. Otabor: None; L. Alomari: None; M. Barnett: None; F. Rodriguez Quinonez: None; I. Tan: Navidea Radiopharmaceuticals, 12, Principal Investigator in a clinical trial, Novartis, 12, Principal Investigator in a clinical trial.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hamilton M, Lam J, Otabor E, Alomari L, Barnett M, Rodriguez Quinonez F, Tan I. Racial Differences in Management and Clinical Outcomes of Giant-Cell Arteritis: A Real-World Propensity-Matched Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-management-and-clinical-outcomes-of-giant-cell-arteritis-a-real-world-propensity-matched-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/racial-differences-in-management-and-clinical-outcomes-of-giant-cell-arteritis-a-real-world-propensity-matched-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology