ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1262

Comparison Of Remission Rates For Pediatric Membranous Plus Proliferative Lupus Nephritis Versus Isolated Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: An Analysis Of The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatism Research Alliance Registry

Alexis Boneparth1, Norman T. Ilowite1 and The CARRA Registry Investigators2, 1Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, NY, 2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus nephritis, pediatric rheumatology and remission

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology - Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects II: Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Pediatric Vasculitis and Pediatric Myositis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Lupus nephritis (LN) affects many patients with pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) and is a significant cause of disease morbidity. Inability to achieve remission of LN is associated with worse outcomes. Data from studies of adult patients with combined proliferative plus membranous LN (P/MLN) suggests that this combined subtype may be more refractory to current treatment strategies than isolated proliferative LN (PLN). The possibility that P/MLN may represent a more difficult to treat subtype in the pediatric population has not yet been examined. We aim to assess whether remission occurs less frequently in pediatric P/MLN, compared to pediatric PLN.

Methods: CARRA Registry data was obtained for 320 subjects with pSLE (age at onset <18 years) and LN; LN was diagnosed by renal biopsy and categorized according to ISN/RPS classification criteria. Remission of proteinuria was defined as protein/creatinine ratio < 0.5. Remission of hematuria was defined as < 6 RBC/hpf on urinalysis.  These cutoffs were determined by the available clinical data from the CARRA registry.  Remission was assessed at the most recent CARRA registry visit gathered ≥ 6 months after diagnostic kidney biopsy. Medication exposure data, non-renal disease characteristics, and demographic data were also assessed. Comparison of these data between subjects with P/MLN and subjects with PLN was conducted.  

Results: A total 184 subjects had PLN (class III or class IV) and a total of 38 subjects had M/PLN (class III+V or class IV+V). No significant difference in proportion of subjects with remission in either proteinuria or hematuria was found between groups with and without membranous disease. (See Table). Estimated GFR less than 90 ml/min/1.73m2, indicating renal insufficiency, was found in 6.1 and 16.1% of subjects with PLN and P/MLN respectively, approaching statistical significance (p=0.07). Exposure rates to mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab were similar between groups. Patients in PLN and M/PLN groups were similar with respect to SLEDAI scores at last study visit, age of SLE onset, gender distribution, and ANA positivity.  Subjects with class IV+V were significantly older at first renal biopsy compared to subjects with class IV (mean age 14.83 vs. 12.71, p=0.005), although this trend was not significant for comparison of subjects with class III vs. class III+V.

Conclusion: CARRA registry subjects with P/MLN and PLN have similar rates of remission for hematuria and proteinuria assessed at the last CARRA registry visit.  There was a trend for the P/MLN group to have more renal insufficiency.   This study was limited by its cross-sectional, retrospective design, and future longitudinal prospective studies will be useful in further assessing the relationship between renal histology findings and response of pediatric LN to treatment.

Description: C:Documents and SettingsuwsuserDesktopimage1.JPG


Disclosure:

A. Boneparth,
None;

N. T. Ilowite,
None;

T. CARRA Registry Investigators,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-remission-rates-for-pediatric-membranous-plus-proliferative-lupus-nephritis-versus-isolated-proliferative-lupus-nephritis-an-analysis-of-the-childhood-arthritis-and-rheumatism-research/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology