ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0567

Sonelokimab in Biologic-Experienced Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From a Phase 2 Trial (ARGO) and Study Design of a Phase 3 Trial (IZAR-2) in Patients With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic TNFi, Including a Risankizumab Reference Arm

Atul Deodhar1, Laure Gossec2, Philip J. Mease3, Xenofon Baraliakos4, Lihi Eder5, Alan Kivitz6, Helena Marzo-Ortega7, Frank Behrens8, Ana-Maria Orbai9, Georg Schett10, Arthur Kavanaugh11, Dennis McGonagle12, Christopher Ritchlin13, Nuala Brennan14, Ben Porter-Brown14, Eva Cullen14, Matthew R. Thomas14, Marius Albulescu14, Alex Godwood14, Kristian Reich15 and Laura Coates16, 1Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 2Sorbonne Universite and Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France, 3Department of Rheumatology, Providence-Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany, 5University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 7NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 8Rheumatology, Immunology - Inflammation Medicine, University Hospital Goethe-University & Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 9Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 10Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany, Erlangen, Germany, 11University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, 12Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 13University of Rochester Medical Center, Canandaigua, NY, 14MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, Zug, Switzerland, 15MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG and Translational Research in Inflammatory Skin Diseases, Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, Zug, Switzerland, 16Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: American College of Rheumatology Criteria, clinical trial, Outcome measures, Psoriatic arthritis, Randomized Trial

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0554–0592) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Sonelokimab (SLK), a novel Nanobody that binds to both IL-17A and IL-17F with similarly high affinity, is designed to target difficult-to-reach sites of inflammation. The Phase 2 ARGO study demonstrated robust joint and skin responses with SLK in PsA. We report Week (W) 24 data for patients with prior biologic exposure in the ARGO trial and describe the design of the Phase 3 IZAR-2 trial that will further evaluate SLK in patients with active PsA after prior biologic TNFi therapy.

Methods: ARGO (NCT05640245) was a 24-week, global, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled double-blind trial of adults with active PsA. Three SLK doses were assessed: 60mg with no induction (NI; Q4W), SLK 60mg with induction (WI), and SLK 120mg WI (induction doses at W0, 2, 4, and 6; Q4W from W8). Patients with >2 prior biologics or primary failure of TNFi or IL-17i were excluded. In this exploratory analysis, W24 outcomes in patients with prior bDMARD exposure treated with SLK 120mg or 60mg WI (IZAR-2 doses) were assessed.

Results: 207 patients were enrolled. Of the 84 patients treated with SLK 120mg (n=43) or 60mg WI (n=41), 15 (17.9%) had exposure to ≥1 bDMARD (TNFi n=10, IL-23i n=7, IL-17i n=5). Among these patients, the primary endpoint of ACR50 was achieved by 53% of patients with exposure to ≥1 bDMARD and 61% of patients with no prior bDMARD exposure. Similar results were seen for minimal disease activity (MDA), which was achieved by 53% of patients with prior bDMARD exposure and 57% of patients with no prior bDMARD exposure who received SLK 120mg or 60mg WI. Of the 5 patients receiving SLK 120mg or 60mg WI with PsO at baseline (≥3% BSA) and prior bDMARD exposure, 4 (80%) achieved PASI 90 (75% for those with no prior bDMARD exposure). SLK was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with IL-17 inhibition. To further assess outcomes in this patient population, we designed a 52-week, global, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled, Phase 3 trial (IZAR-2; NCT06641089; Figure). An estimated 600 participants will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to SLK 60mg WI, SLK 120mg WI, PBO (SLK 120mg WI from W16), or risankizumab (RZB). Given the results from ARGO, this sample size should provide sufficient power to demonstrate a statistically significant difference vs. PBO on the primary outcome of ACR50 at W16. Eligible participants will have PsA fulfilling CASPAR criteria, active disease (TJC68 ≥3 and SJC66 ≥3), currently active or historical PsO, and inadequate response or intolerance to 1 or 2 biologic TNFi. Key secondary outcomes (all vs. PBO at W16) include ACR20, PASI 90, MDA, and HAQ-DI. RZB, an approved IL-23 p19i PsA therapy commonly used after prior inadequate response to TNFi, will be the active reference arm. A secondary endpoint of ACR50 at W16 with SLK vs. RZB will provide insights into treatment choices with IL-17A/F and IL-23i after TNFi failure.

Conclusion: In patients with active PsA and prior exposure to >1 bDMARD in the Phase 2 ARGO trial, SLK 120mg and 60mg WI showed efficacy in controlling signs and symptoms of PsA and achieving MDA response. Interpretation is limited by patient numbers; hence, a larger Phase 3 trial specifically in patients with prior inadequate response or intolerance to biologic TNFi (IZAR-2) is ongoing and actively recruiting at sites across the USA.

Supporting image 1Figure. Study design


Disclosures: A. Deodhar: BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, J&J, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; L. Gossec: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 5, BMS, 2, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2, 5; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, Century, 2, Cullinan, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Inmagene, 2, J&J Innovative Medicine, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sana, 5, Spyre, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6; X. Baraliakos: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid Instructor, Advanz, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Alexion, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Alphasigma, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Amgen, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, BMS, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Celgene, 6, Celltrion, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Cesas, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Chugai, 2, 6, Clarivate, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Galapagos, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, J&J, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Merck, 6, MoonLake, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid instructor, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Peervoice, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Pfizer, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Roche, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Sandoz, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Springer, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Stada, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Takeda, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, UCB, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Zuellig, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor; L. Eder: AbbVie, 1, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 1, 2, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 1, 5, J&J, 1, 2, 5, Janssen, 1, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, UCB, 1, 2, 5; A. Kivitz: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Amgen, 6, 11, Coval, 2, EcoR1, 2, Eli Lilly, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 1, 2, Genzyme, 12, Scientific expert fees, Gilead, 2, 11, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 6, 11, Grünenthal, 2, Halia, 2, Horizon, 1, 2, Innovaderm, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 11, Pacira, 2, Pfizer, 6, 11, Prime, 6, Princeton Biopartners, 1, Prometheus, 2, Sanofi-Regeneron, 6, Santa Ana Bio Inc, 2, Selecta, 2, SynAct, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 1, 2, 6, XBiotech, 2; H. Marzo-Ortega: AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Biogen, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Takeda, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; F. Behrens: AbbVie, 2, 6, 12, Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Acelyrin, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 6, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, 2, 5, 6, Cilag, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 5, Sandoz, 6, UCB, 2, 6, 12, Support for attending meetings and/or travel; A. Orbai: AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, BMS, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2; G. Schett: Cabaletta, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Janssen, 6, Kyverna, 6, Novartis, 6, UCB, 6; A. Kavanaugh: Amgen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, GRAPPA, 12, Co-President, Janssen, 2, 5, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2; D. McGonagle: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Merck, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sobi, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 6; C. Ritchlin: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, MoonLake Pharma, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Solara, 2, UCB, 2; N. Brennan: MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 3, 11; B. Porter-Brown: MoonLake Immunotherapetics, 3, 11, Sanofi, 3, 11; E. Cullen: MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 3, 11; M. Thomas: MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 3, 11; M. Albulescu: MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 3, 11; A. Godwood: MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 3, 11; K. Reich: AbbVie, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Almirall, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Amgen, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Eli Lilly, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Galderma, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Janssen-Cilag, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Kyowa Kirin, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, LEO Pharma, 1, 6, 12, Participated in clinical trials, Medac, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics AG, 3, 11, Novartis, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials, Ocean Pharma, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials, Pfizer, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials, Sanofi, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials, UCB, 1, 6, 12, participated in clinical trials; L. Coates: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Domain, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Deodhar A, Gossec L, Mease P, Baraliakos X, Eder L, Kivitz A, Marzo-Ortega H, Behrens F, Orbai A, Schett G, Kavanaugh A, McGonagle D, Ritchlin C, Brennan N, Porter-Brown B, Cullen E, Thomas M, Albulescu M, Godwood A, Reich K, Coates L. Sonelokimab in Biologic-Experienced Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From a Phase 2 Trial (ARGO) and Study Design of a Phase 3 Trial (IZAR-2) in Patients With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic TNFi, Including a Risankizumab Reference Arm [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sonelokimab-in-biologic-experienced-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-a-phase-2-trial-argo-and-study-design-of-a-phase-3-trial-izar-2-in-patients-with-inadequate-response-or-i/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sonelokimab-in-biologic-experienced-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-a-phase-2-trial-argo-and-study-design-of-a-phase-3-trial-izar-2-in-patients-with-inadequate-response-or-i/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology