ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0827

Utilization of American College of Rheumatology Vaccination Guidelines in Clinic: A Needs Assessment in an Internal Medicine Residency Program

Julia Levy1, Genna Braverman1, Kirana Gudi2 and Juliet Aizer1, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Weill Cornell, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: education, medical, practice guidelines, primary care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Professional Education (0825–0830)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:30PM-3:45PM

Background/Purpose: Despite increased risks of infection in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD), vaccination rates for this population are suboptimal. In 2023 the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) published guidelines on the use of vaccinations in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Internists play a central role in engaging patients in shared decision-making on vaccination, yet the degree of guideline awareness and guideline-concordant practice among internal medicine (IM) trainees is unknown. We performed a needs assessment in an IM residency clinic to inform future educational interventions related to ACR vaccination guideline implementation.

Methods: We reviewed the literature on uptake of ACR vaccination guidelines in IM residency clinic, and barriers to vaccination. Based on barriers described in the literature for vaccinating patients with SARD, we designed an 18-item questionnaire (Figure 1) inquiring about attitudes toward vaccinating patients with SARD, ACR vaccination guideline awareness and barriers to implementation, as well as demographics. The questionnaire was distributed electronically via REDCap to all IM residents and faculty involved in outpatient clinic precepting in a large academic center between 12/2024 – 5/2025. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and differences between residents and faculty were examined with the Fisher exact test. The study was deemed exempt by the local Institutional Review Board.

Results: Survey responses were received from 13 out of 35 faculty (37%) and 11 out of 131 residents (8%). Among participants, 79% of faculty compared with 45% of residents reported they felt confident about their knowledge of vaccine efficacy, safety, and impact on disease (p=0.0035). Only 9% of residents and 8% of faculty felt that rheumatologists should be the sole provider of vaccinations for patients with SARD (Table 1). Only 45% of residents and 15% of faculty felt their clinic was too busy to provide vaccines for this population. A total of 73% of residents and 38% of faculty reported they did not receive training in this topic in their medical education. Only 27% of residents and 23% of faculty were aware of the ACR vaccination guidelines. Among residents, 64% reported making vaccination recommendations for this population in their clinic compared with 92% of faculty.

Conclusion: A majority of IM residents and precepting faculty participating in this single-center needs assessment reported making vaccine recommendations in clinic for their patients with SARD, and most respondents felt that vaccine guidance was a shared responsibility between rheumatologists and internists. However, over 70% were unaware of the ACR vaccination guidelines. A potential limitation of this study is the low response rate. These data help inform educational interventions to improve ACR vaccination guideline implementation by IM residents in this setting.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Needs assessment survey distributed to IM residents and faculty

Supporting image 2Table 1. Barriers to providing vaccinations in IM residency clinic among residents and attendings.


Disclosures: J. Levy: None; G. Braverman: None; K. Gudi: None; J. Aizer: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Levy J, Braverman G, Gudi K, Aizer J. Utilization of American College of Rheumatology Vaccination Guidelines in Clinic: A Needs Assessment in an Internal Medicine Residency Program [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utilization-of-american-college-of-rheumatology-vaccination-guidelines-in-clinic-a-needs-assessment-in-an-internal-medicine-residency-program/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/utilization-of-american-college-of-rheumatology-vaccination-guidelines-in-clinic-a-needs-assessment-in-an-internal-medicine-residency-program/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology