ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0740

Intravenous versus subcutaneous administration of Tocilizumab in aortitis associated with giant cell arteritis: multicenter open-label study of 196 patients

Carmen Secada-Gómez1, Javier Loricera2, Adrian Martin-Gutierrez3, Santos Castañeda4 and Ricardo Blanco1, 1Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Immunopathology Group, Santander, Spain, Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Immunopathology Group, Santander , Spain, Santander, Spain, 3Division of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Immunopathology Group, Santander, Spain., Renedo de Piélagos, Spain, 4Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: comparative effectiveness, giant cell arteritis, Imaging, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0731–0764) Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Aortitis associated to Giant cell arteritis (GCA) (GCA-aortitis) is one of the most severe manifestation of GCA. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has demonstrated efficacy in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) including GCA, previous pharmacokinetic studies, have shown more stable and sustained levels of tocilizumab with the subcutaneous form compared to the intravenous form. However, there are no studies comparing intravenous (IV) vs subcutaneous (SC) administration of TCZ in GCA-aortitis.Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of TCZ in GCA-aortitis according the route of administration (IV vs SC) in a wide series of patients in a clinical world setting.

Methods: Multicentre study of 196 patients diagnosed with GCA-aortitis by imaging techniques and treated with TCZ. Patients were divided in two groups according to the route of administration of TCZ: i) IV, and ii) SC. GCA was diagnosed by 1990 ACR criteria, and/or temporal artery biopsy and/or imaging techniques. Aortitis was diagnosed mainly by 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Main outcomes were EULAR remission definition (clinical remission and normalization of CRP and ESR), imaging remission (considered when vascular FDG uptake was less than liver uptake in 18F-FDG PET/CT) and glucocorticoid withdrawal after TCZ initiation.

Results: We studied 196 patients (148 women 48 men) ,mean age 69.8±9.4 years treated with TCZ were included. One hundred and ten received IV-TCZ and 86 SC-TCZ (Table). Time between diagnosis of aortitis-GCA and TCZ initiation was shorter in SC group, although without reaching statistical significance. Interestingly, no differences in acute phase reactants were observed at TCZ initiation between both groups. There were no differences between the two routes of TCZ administration in glucocorticoid-sparing effect after TCZ initiation. Noticeably, statistical differences in EULAR remission definition were observed after 24-month follow-up, although there were no differences in imaging remission (Figure).

Conclusion: In GCA-aortitis, SC TCZ might be more effective than IV in achieving the EULAR remission target in clinical practice conditions after 24-month follow-up.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: C. Secada-Gómez: None; J. Loricera: AbbVie/Abbott, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, Janssen, 5, Merck/MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; A. Martin-Gutierrez: None; S. Castañeda: None; R. Blanco: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Merck/MSD, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Secada-Gómez C, Loricera J, Martin-Gutierrez A, Castañeda S, Blanco R. Intravenous versus subcutaneous administration of Tocilizumab in aortitis associated with giant cell arteritis: multicenter open-label study of 196 patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/intravenous-versus-subcutaneous-administration-of-tocilizumab-in-aortitis-associated-with-giant-cell-arteritis-multicenter-open-label-study-of-196-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/intravenous-versus-subcutaneous-administration-of-tocilizumab-in-aortitis-associated-with-giant-cell-arteritis-multicenter-open-label-study-of-196-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology