ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0455

Assessment of Pain Outcomes in Pooled Phase 3 Trials of a Selective, Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibitor, Deucravacitinib, in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Lihi Eder1, Philip J. Mease2, Vibeke Strand3, Alexis Ogdie4, Atul Deodhar5, Rebecca Haberman6, April Armstrong7, Alice B. Gottlieb8, David Roberts9, Laurie Eliason10, Stefan Varga11, Eleni Vritzali12, Janice Li11 and Laure Gossec13, 1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Department of Rheumatology, Providence-Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 3Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto CA, Portola Valley, CA, 4University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 5Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 6NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 7University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA, Los Angeles, CA, 8Department of Dermatology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 9Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, United Kingdom, 10Bristol Myers Squibb,, Princeton, NJ, 11Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 12Bristol Myers Squibb, Boudry, Switzerland, 13Sorbonne Universite and Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: pain, Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0430–0469) Rheumatoid Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Patients rate pain as one of the most important aspects of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Pain signaling involves a series of cytokines, including those downstream of tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibition. Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective allosteric inhibitor of TYK2, mediates signaling of key cytokines in PsA pathogenesis. Deucravacitinib was efficacious vs placebo in phase 3 trials in patients with active PsA. Deucravacitinib is approved for the treatment of adults with plaque psoriasis and is currently under investigation in two phase 3 trials in PsA (POETYK PsA-1 [NCT04908202] and POETYK PsA-2 [NCT04908189]). This analysis includes pooled data from both trials to characterize the effect of deucravacitinib on pain across 3 pain measures for the overall population and by sex to examine its relationship to pain intensity and differences in response to therapies.

Methods: Patients with PsA were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg (n = 648) or placebo (n = 646). All patients met the CASPAR classification criteria for PsA as part of study enrollment. Pain was assessed at baseline and Week 16 using the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Pain visual analog scale (VAS; scored from 0-100); Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) pain instrument (scored from 0-10); and the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain questionnaire (6-item Likert scale from “none” [0] to “very severe” [6]). Adjusted mean change in scores from baseline and proportion of patients with different levels of change to Week 16 were reported. Correlations among pain scales and disease activity were also evaluated.

Results: At baseline, mean pain scores in the deucravacitinib vs placebo groups were: pain VAS 61.8 (20.45) vs 61.4 (20.68); PsAID Pain 6.3 (2.04) vs 6.3 (2.08); and SF-36 Bodily Pain 4.3 (0.96) vs 4.3 (0.98). All assessments of pain were strongly correlated with the disease activity at baseline. Overall, mean improvements in pain at Week 16 were greater in patients treated with deucravacitinib vs placebo across all measures. No consistent differences were observed between sexes in mean improvements in pain measures (Figure 1). In patients treated with deucravacitinib, nearly two-thirds reported improvements ≥ minimal clinically important difference, and >20% reported a 70% improvement in pain (Figure 2). Mean changes in patient-reported pain were highly correlated among pain instruments, demonstrating consistency (Figure 3).

Conclusion: Pooled data from 2 trials demonstrated a higher proportion of patients treated with deucravacitinib reported improvement in pain vs placebo, regardless of the instrument used. Improvements were generally consistent between males and females. These findings demonstrate that the use of deucravacitinib resulted in pain relief in patients with PsA.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: L. Eder: AbbVie, 1, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 1, 2, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 1, 5, J&J, 1, 2, 5, Janssen, 1, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, UCB, 1, 2, 5; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, Century, 2, Cullinan, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Inmagene, 2, J&J Innovative Medicine, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sana, 5, Spyre, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6; V. Strand: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Alumis, 2, Amgen, 2, Arthrosi, 2, Artiva, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Bayer, 2, BMS, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, catalys, 2, contura, 2, Cullinan, 2, Fate Therapeutics, 2, Fortress Biotech, 2, genasence, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Inmedix, 2, Lipum, 2, Longitude Capiral, 2, MED institute, 2, Novartis, 2, RAPT, 2, Royalty Pharma, 2, Sanofi, 2, scipher medcine corp, 2, SetPoint Medical, 2, Sobi, 2, Spherix, 2, Synact, 2, Takeda, 2, Topography, 2, Zoe, 2; A. Ogdie: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 11, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, CorEvitas, LLC, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Forward Databank, 5, Gilead, 1, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Kopa/Twill Health, 2, NIH/NIAMS, National Psoriasis Foundation, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 11, Pfizer, 2, 5, 11, Rheumatology Research Foundation, 5, Spyre, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, University of Pennsylvania, 5; A. Deodhar: BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, J&J, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; R. Haberman: Johnson and Johnson, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 2; A. Armstrong: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Almirall, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Arcutis, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Aslan, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Beiersdorf, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Dermavant, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Dermira, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Eli Lilly, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, EPI Health, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Incyte, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Janssen, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Leo Pharma, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Mindera Health, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Nimbus, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Novartis, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Ortho Dermatologics, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Pfizer, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Regeneron, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Sanofi, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, Sun Pharma, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator, UCB, 1, 6, 12, Research Investigator; A. Gottlieb: Amgen, 2, 4, 6, Avalo Therapeutics, 5, BMS, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 4, 6, Highlights Therapeutics, 2, 4, 6, Janssen, 2, 4, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 5, Novartis, 2, 4, 6, Sanofi, 2, 4, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 4, 6, Takeda, 2, 4, 6, Teva, 2, 4, 6, UCB, 2, 4, 5, 6; D. Roberts: Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3, 11; L. Eliason: Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3, 11; S. Varga: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 11; E. Vritzali: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 11; J. Li: Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3, 11; L. Gossec: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 5, BMS, 2, Celltrion, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Eder L, Mease P, Strand V, Ogdie A, Deodhar A, Haberman R, Armstrong A, Gottlieb A, Roberts D, Eliason L, Varga S, Vritzali E, Li J, Gossec L. Assessment of Pain Outcomes in Pooled Phase 3 Trials of a Selective, Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibitor, Deucravacitinib, in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-pain-outcomes-in-pooled-phase-3-trials-of-a-selective-tyrosine-kinase-2-inhibitor-deucravacitinib-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-pain-outcomes-in-pooled-phase-3-trials-of-a-selective-tyrosine-kinase-2-inhibitor-deucravacitinib-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology