ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0397

Paediatric uveitis – Retrospective comparison of cataract surgery outcomes with or without intraocular lens implantation from two tertiary centres in United Kingdom

Chaitra Govardhan1, Ashwini Batchu Prithvi1, Bushra Aladaileh1, Elizabeth Cattermole2, Farrag Abdelsattar2, Catherine Guly2, Jessy Choi3, Johannes Keller2 and Athimalaipet V Ramanan1, 1Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, United Kingdom, 2Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom, 3Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: comparative effectiveness, Juvenile Inflammatory Arthritis, Pediatric rheumatology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0387–0429) Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Cataract is one of the most common and visually debilitating complications of paediatric uveitis developing as a consequence of chronic inflammation and steroid use. Cataract surgery can be technically challenging in patients with uveitis and the outcomes less certain.(1) Inserting an intraocular lens (IOL) is controversial for paediatric uveitis patients leading to variable practice across different institutions. This study compares the outcomes of cataract surgery associated with paediatric uveitis with or without IOL implantation.

Methods: A retrospective comparison study was conducted at two centres, Bristol Eye Hospital (Centre 1-Cataract surgery with IOL implantation) and Sheffield Children’s Hospital (Centre 2-Cataract surgery without IOL implantation). All children below 18 years of age with uveitis who underwent cataract surgery between year 2011 and 2024 were included. Pre and post operative outcomes from the two groups were compared, including best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), LogMAR lines of improvement, ocular inflammation and complications. Follow up data upto 2 years post-surgery where available were recorded. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: There were total 35 children (43 eyes) identified from both centres, 25 children (30 eyes) from centre-1 and 10 children (13 eyes) from centre 2. The median age at diagnosis in years was 5.5years(centre 1) and 5years (centre 2) and median age at surgery was 9 and 5 years with M:F=2:3 and 1.6:1 respectively. JIA was the most common etiology at both centres (60% and 90% respectively). Anterior uveitis was the most common subtype of uveitis at both centres (29 eyes, 9 eyes respectively)-Table1. Surgical capsulotomy was required in 3 eyes (10%) by 24 months at centre 1. Active anterior chamber inflammation >1+ cells was recorded in 10(33%), 8(36.4%), 5(16.7%) in centre-1 and 1(7.7%), 2(15.4%), 1(7.7%) in centre-2 at 3,12 and 24 months.(Table2) Median preoperative BCVA (IQR) was 0.84 (0.60-1.43) and 1.6 (0.92- 2.48) respectively. The median post-operative BCVA at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months at centre 1 was 0.20,0.2 and 0.10 and at centre 2 was 0.38, 0.50 and 0.15. Percentage of children with 2 or more lines of improvement at 3,12 and 24 months at centre 1 was 82.8%, 93.1% and 80.8% whereas at centre 2 was 84.6%, 75% and 81.8%.(Table3)

Conclusion: Good visual improvement following cataract surgery in children with uveitis with and without IOL would support either of the practices. However, a caveat being that IOL insertion could potentially be associated with active inflammation. References:1. Quiñones K, Cervantes-Castañeda RA, Hynes AY, Daoud YJ, Foster CS. Outcomes of cataract surgery in children with chronic uveitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Apr;35(4):725–31.

Supporting image 1

Table:1 Demographic and Clinical comparison of the study groups

Supporting image 2Table-2: Grading of anterior chamber inflammation in eyes with and without IOL

Supporting image 3Table-3 Comparison of pre- and post-operative best corrected visual acuity and lines of improvement at 3, 12 and 24 months.


Disclosures: C. Govardhan: None; A. Batchu Prithvi: None; B. Aladaileh: None; E. Cattermole: None; F. Abdelsattar: None; C. Guly: None; J. Choi: None; J. Keller: None; A. V Ramanan: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Govardhan C, Batchu Prithvi A, Aladaileh B, Cattermole E, Abdelsattar F, Guly C, Choi J, Keller J, V Ramanan A. Paediatric uveitis – Retrospective comparison of cataract surgery outcomes with or without intraocular lens implantation from two tertiary centres in United Kingdom [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/paediatric-uveitis-retrospective-comparison-of-cataract-surgery-outcomes-with-or-without-intraocular-lens-implantation-from-two-tertiary-centres-in-united-kingdom/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/paediatric-uveitis-retrospective-comparison-of-cataract-surgery-outcomes-with-or-without-intraocular-lens-implantation-from-two-tertiary-centres-in-united-kingdom/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology