ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0222

Evaluating the Barriers and Facilitators for Collecting and Documenting Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures Using a Rheumatology Provider Survey

Isaac Smith1, Linda Tovar2, Michael Battistone2, Andrea Barker3, Bryant England4, Ankoor Shah5, Joshua Baker6, Katherine Wysham7, Beth Wallace8, Ted Mikuls4, Deanna Lazaro9, Pascale Schwab10, Paul Monach11, Gail Kerr12, Andreas Reimold13, Gary Kunkel2, Liron Caplan14, John Richards15, Aleksander Lenert16, Andrew Jones17, Maria I. ("Maio") Danila18, Brian Sauer19, Jorge Rojas20 and Grant Cannon21, 1Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, 2Salt Lake City VA, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Salt Lake City VA, Cottonwood Heights, UT, 4University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 5Duke University, Durham, NC, 6University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 7VA PUGET SOUND/UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, Seattle, WA, 8Michigan Medicine, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, 9VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, 10Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 11VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, 12Washington DC VAMC/Georgetown and Howard Universities, Washington, DC, 13Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 14University of Colorado, Denver, CO, 15Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, 16Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 17VA Saint Louis and Washington University, Saint Louis, 18University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, 19Salt Lake City VA/University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 20VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, 21University of Utah and Salt Lake City VA, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disease Activity, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0210–0232) Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Collection of disease activity measures (DAMs) is a key component of high-quality care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. This study surveyed rheumatology providers at Veterans Affairs RA (VARA) registry sites to identify barriers and facilitators for collecting and documenting DAMs.

Methods: The VARA registry is multicenter, prospective cohort study of US Veterans with RA who receive care within the Veterans Health Administration. A provider survey was developed to investigate barriers and facilitators for collecting and documenting DAMs [tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Physician Global Assessment (PGA), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), pain score (PS), Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-Reactive Protein (CRP)] for RA patients at each VARA site. Survey questions were then independently evaluated and refined by 5 expert reviewers. The final 42-question survey was administered to 92 VA rheumatology providers at 16 VARA sites. Sites were designated as high- or low-performing based on whether the percentage of site notes that documented all 6 clinical DAMs (TJC, SJC, PGA, PtGA, PS, MDHAQ) for VARA participants was above or below the mean of the 16 VARA sites from 3/2024 to 3/2025. Responses were scored using 5-point Likert scales. Responses were grouped into “no difficulty or barrier” and “some difficulty or barrier” categories for DAM barrier questions and “very helpful” and “less helpful” categories for DAM facilitator questions due to clustering of responses at the low and high ends of the barrier and facilitator scales respectively. Results were reported as descriptive statistics, and provider responses from high- and lower-performing sites were compared using chi-square testing.

Results: 66 providers (71.7%) from 15 sites (93.8%) submitted survey responses. Providers at both high-and low-performing sites reported the MDHAQ, ESR, CRP, and PtGA were the most difficult DAMs to collect (Table 1). Providers at both high- and low-performing sites reported the most common DAM barriers were labs not being drawn prior to clinic visits, DAM forms not being completed, insufficient time, inconsistent DAMs assessment by fellows, and lack of research support staff (Table 2). Providers at low-performing sites cited two barriers more often than high-performing sites: lack of research support staff (77.1% vs. 51.7%; p=0.03) and failure to identify Veterans requiring DAMs assessments (65.7% vs. 37.9%; p=0.03). Among all respondents, the most common DAM facilitators were having an RA-specific clinic, using standardized DAM templates, using printed DAM forms, drawing labs before clinic visits, and having research support staff (Table 3). Providers at high-performing sites noted having an RA-specific clinic as a facilitator more often than low-performing sites (100.0% vs. 25.0%; p< 0.01).

Conclusion: Our rheumatology provider survey identified several modifiable barriers and facilitators for DAMs collection and documentation for RA patients. These results will inform future VARA registry QI efforts and may provide useful information to improve DAMs collection and documentation in other healthcare systems.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Disease Activity Measurement Components Ranked by Difficulty of Collection based on Rheumatology Provider Responses. CRP, C-Reactive Protein; ESR, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; MDHAQ, Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire; VARA, Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry

Supporting image 2Table 2. Barriers to Collecting Disease Activity Measures Ranked by Provider Response Frequency. CPRS, Computerized Patient Record System; CRP, C-Reactive Protein; DAMs, Disease Activity Measures; ESR, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; VARA, Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry.

Supporting image 3Table 3. Facilitators of Collecting Disease Activity Measure Ranked by Provider Response Frequency. Note: the “N” and “n” of the full population and high- and low-performing sites excludes providers who responded, “not currently available at my site.” CPRS, Computerized Patient Record System; CRP, C-Reactive Protein; DAMs, Disease Activity Measures; ESR, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; VARA, Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry.


Disclosures: I. Smith: None; L. Tovar: None; M. Battistone: None; A. Barker: None; B. England: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5; A. Shah: Adtium Bio, 2, Cabaletta Bio, 5, Horizon Therapeuatics, 5, Mitsubishi, 2; J. Baker: None; K. Wysham: None; B. Wallace: None; T. Mikuls: Amgen, 2, 5, Merck/MSD, 1, Olatech Therapeutics, 1, UCB, 1; D. Lazaro: None; P. Schwab: None; P. Monach: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2; G. Kerr: Amgen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, CSL-Behring, 2, Janssen, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2; A. Reimold: None; G. Kunkel: None; L. Caplan: None; J. Richards: None; A. Lenert: None; A. Jones: None; M. Danila: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Pfizer, 5; B. Sauer: None; J. Rojas: None; G. Cannon: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Smith I, Tovar L, Battistone M, Barker A, England B, Shah A, Baker J, Wysham K, Wallace B, Mikuls T, Lazaro D, Schwab P, Monach P, Kerr G, Reimold A, Kunkel G, Caplan L, Richards J, Lenert A, Jones A, Danila M, Sauer B, Rojas J, Cannon G. Evaluating the Barriers and Facilitators for Collecting and Documenting Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures Using a Rheumatology Provider Survey [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluating-the-barriers-and-facilitators-for-collecting-and-documenting-rheumatoid-arthritis-disease-activity-measures-using-a-rheumatology-provider-survey/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluating-the-barriers-and-facilitators-for-collecting-and-documenting-rheumatoid-arthritis-disease-activity-measures-using-a-rheumatology-provider-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology