ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0126

Performance of the 2023 and 2006 APS Classification Criteria in Pediatric Patients Diagnosed with APS: A Multisite Cohort Study

Jacqueline Madison1, Elizabeth Sloan2, Cristina Saez3, Olivia Kwan4, Kevin Lewis1, Jonathan Marilao5, Blake Baay6, Rasha Elrefai4, Marissa Dale7, Deborah McCurdy8, Jheel Bhatt9, Sasidhar Goteti10, Ekemini Ogbu11, Jason S. Knight1 and Yu (Ray) Zuo1, 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2UT Southwestern, Children's Medical Center, and Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, TX, 3Children's Hospital Colorado, Glendale, CO, 4Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 5University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, 6Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, TX, 7Hospital for Special Surgery/NYP Cornell, New York, NY, 8UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 9Advent Health Orlando, Orlando, FL, 10University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 11Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: American College of Rheumatology Criteria, antiphospholipid syndrome, classification criteria, Pediatric rheumatology, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0115–0144) Antiphospholipid Syndrome Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thrombo-inflammatory disorder that causes significant morbidity and mortality, even in children. The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, which use weighted clinical and laboratory scores, improve specificity (99% vs. 86%) but reduce sensitivity (84% vs. 99%) compared to the 2006 criteria in adults. However, no pediatric-specific criteria exist, and the 2023 criteria have not been validated in children. This multisite North American study aims to assess the performance of both the 2023 and 2006 criteria in pediatric APS.

Methods: Patients with pediatric APS and childhood-onset SLE were initially identified by rheumatologists at 5 academic institutions through electronic medical record searches using diagnosis codes. APS diagnosis was determined by documentation of a confirmed diagnosis at age ≤18 by a pediatric hematologist or rheumatologist. SLE controls had a confirmed diagnosis by age 18 and ≥2 antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) test results available. Analyses were performed using Python (v3.10).

Results: We evaluated the performance of the adult 2023 and 2006 APS classification criteria in a well-characterized, multicenter cohort of pediatric patients diagnosed with APS (n=57) and lupus (n=25) (Table 1). When applied to pediatric patients, the 2023 criteria demonstrated improved but similar specificity compared with the 2006 version (100% vs. 96%) and reduced sensitivity (68% vs. 75%). The 2023 criteria also showed a slightly higher positive predictive value (PPV) for diagnosis, reflecting a modest increase in precision (100% vs. 98%), but lower negative predictive value (NPV, 58% vs. 63%). The F1 score, reflecting overall diagnostic performance, was also lower with the 2023 criteria (0.81 vs. 0.85). ROC analysis favored the 2006 criteria (AUC = 0.86 vs. 0.84) (Table 2). Both criteria demonstrated strong agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.88). Among the 18 APS patients who failed to meet the 2023 criteria (including all 14 who also failed the 2006 criteria), 4 did not reach the clinical criteria threshold, and 14 lacked sufficient laboratory points—8 of whom had only a single positive lupus anticoagulant test. Of the 4 patients meeting the 2006 but not the 2023 criteria, 2 failed to meet clinical and 2 failed to meet lab thresholds. To better understand the profile of missed cases, we compared domain scores between false negatives and the overall cohort. False negatives under the 2006 criteria had significantly lower laboratory scores (p = 0.033), suggesting under-recognition of patients with weaker serologic profiles. No significant differences were observed in clinical scores.

Conclusion: Both the 2006 and 2023 APS criteria perform reasonably well in children but with lower sensitivity than in adults. The 2006 criteria are more sensitive—especially for cases with milder, lower-scoring aPL profiles—while the 2023 criteria offer greater specificity. Their high concordance supports the reliability of both systems, but also underscores the need to refine adult-based criteria to better capture true pediatric APS. Our ongoing multisite study (target n=300 across 7 sites), using expert-confirmed diagnoses, will help guide optimal classification in this population.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: J. Madison: None; E. Sloan: None; C. Saez: None; O. Kwan: None; K. Lewis: None; J. Marilao: None; B. Baay: None; R. Elrefai: None; M. Dale: None; D. McCurdy: None; J. Bhatt: None; S. Goteti: None; E. Ogbu: Cartesian Therapeutics, 2; J. Knight: BioCryst, 2, Ouro Medicines, 2, Roche, 2, Roivant Sciences, 2, Visterra, 2; Y. Zuo: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Madison J, Sloan E, Saez C, Kwan O, Lewis K, Marilao J, Baay B, Elrefai R, Dale M, McCurdy D, Bhatt J, Goteti S, Ogbu E, Knight J, Zuo Y. Performance of the 2023 and 2006 APS Classification Criteria in Pediatric Patients Diagnosed with APS: A Multisite Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/performance-of-the-2023-and-2006-aps-classification-criteria-in-pediatric-patients-diagnosed-with-aps-a-multisite-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/performance-of-the-2023-and-2006-aps-classification-criteria-in-pediatric-patients-diagnosed-with-aps-a-multisite-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology