ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1347

A Multi-Biomarker Disease Activity Score For Rheumatoid Arthritis Predicts Radiographic Damage In The BeSt Study

I.M. Markusse1, L. Dirven1, M. van den Broek1, K.H. Han2, M.F. van Lieshout3, N. Riyazi4, R.J. Bolce5, E.H. Sasso5, P.J.S.M. Kerstens6, W.F. Lems7, T.W.J. Huizinga1 and C.F. Allaart1, 1Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3Rheumatology, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, Netherlands, 4Rheumatology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands, 5Crescendo Bioscience Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 6Rheumatology, Jan van Breemen Research Institute | Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 7Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biomarkers, radiology and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects II: Predictors of Disease Course in Rheumatoid Arthritis - Treatment Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: To determine whether a multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score could predict radiographic damage progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: The BeSt study enrolled 508 patients. Of these, 84 patients had MBDA scores at baseline and radiographs of hands and feet at baseline and 1 year later and 81 patients had MBDA scores at 1 year and radiographs at 1 year and at 2 years. Radiographs were scored by two independent blinded readers using the Sharp van der Heijde Score (SHS).

MBDA scores were calculated using a validated algorithm (Vectra® DA algorithm score) integrating the levels of 12 biomarkers, (VCAM-1, EGF, VEGF-A, IL-6, TNF-RI, MMP-1, MMP-3, YKL-40, leptin, resistin, SAA, CRP) for assessing disease activity in patients with RA. The generated MBDA score ranges between 1 and 100, and can be categorized in low (≤ 29), moderate (>29 – 44) and high (>44) disease activity levels.

Receiver Operating Curves (ROC) were used to calculate an area under the curve (AUC) with outcome any radiographic damage progression (increase ≤ 0.5 points SHS) yes or no. Poisson regression with increase in SHS as continuous outcome was used to calculate a relative risk (RR). In all analyses MBDA scores are compared to disease activity scores (DAS) in predicting radiographic damage in the following 12 months.

Results: Baseline characteristics of patients in this analysis were similar to the entire BeSt cohort. Mean age was 53 and 75% were female. Mean Disease Activity Score (DAS) was 4.30, 62% were rheumatoid factor positive and 56% anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) positive.

At baseline, DAS had an AUC of 0.373 (95% CI 0.248 – 0.498) and MBDA had an AUC of 0.606 (95% CI 0.482 – 0.729) on radiographic progression in the subsequent year. At one year, the AUC for DAS was 0.527 (95% 0.392 – 0.729) compared to an AUC of 0.686 (95% CI 0.564 – 0.809) for MBDA.

Poisson regression showed a RR of 1.039 for MBDA at baseline to develop radiographic progression, adjusted for DAS and ACPA, indicating a 1.47 times higher risk of radiologic progression with each 10 points MBDA increase. At 1 year, the RR of MBDA, also adjusted for DAS and ACPA, is 1.037, indicating a 1.44 times higher risk with each 10 points MBDA increase. A high baseline MBDA shows a RR of 3.7 for radiologic progression in the next year compared to low and moderate (≤ 44 ) baseline MBDA levels combined. At 1 year, high MBDA showed a RR of 4.6 compared to low MBDA. Moderate MBDA compared to low MBDA at 1 year does not show a significantly greater risk of radiologic progression at 2 years (Table 1).

Table 1: Poisson regression analysis with MBDA categories and  progression in the subsequent 12 month period.

 

Risk for SHS progression, baseline to 1 year

Baseline (N=84)

RR

95% CI

P value

MBDA ≤ 44

ref

ref

ref

MBDA > 44

3.74

1.45 – 9.66

0.006

At 1 year (N=81)

 Risk for SHS progression, year 1 to year 2  

MBDA ≤ 29

ref

ref

ref

MBDA > 29 – 44

1.44

0.45 – 4.55

0.537

MBDA > 44

4.62

1.34 – 15.95

0.015

Conclusion: Adjusted for DAS and ACPA, baseline MBDA scores predicted radiographic damage progression at 1 year as well as MBDA at 1 year predicted radiographic progression at year 2 during disease course. Therefore, MBDA may be of value in future treatment strategies in RA patients.


Disclosure:

I. M. Markusse,
None;

L. Dirven,
None;

M. van den Broek,
None;

K. H. Han,
None;

M. F. van Lieshout,
None;

N. Riyazi,
None;

R. J. Bolce,

Crescendo Bioscience,

3,

Crescendo Bioscience,

9;

E. H. Sasso,

Crescendo Bioscience,

3,

Crescendo Bioscience,

9;

P. J. S. M. Kerstens,
None;

W. F. Lems,

W. F. Lems received speakers fee from roche, abbott, pfizer, merck,

5;

T. W. J. Huizinga,

TWJ Huizinga has received lecture fees/consultancy fees from Merck, UCB, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biotest AG, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Abbott, Crescendo Bioscience, Nycomed, Boeringher, Takeda, and Eli Lilly,

5;

C. F. Allaart,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-multi-biomarker-disease-activity-score-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-predicts-radiographic-damage-in-the-best-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology