ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1506

Total Hip Replacement Outcomes in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Susan M. Goodman1, Rebecca Zhu2, Wei-Ti Huang3, Mark P. Figgie4, Michael Alexiades5 and Lisa A. Mandl1, 1Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Clinical Research, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Epidemiology and Statistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 5Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), outcome measures and total joint replacement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment: II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Historically, outcomes for total hip replacement (THR) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients were poor, but contemporary outcomes are not well described. We analyzed two-year THR outcomes in a cohort of AS patients compared with osteoarthritis (OA) controls.

Methods: A case- control study was performed using data from a high volume single institution THR registry.  AS were identified by ICD-9 code and confirmed by chart review.  AS cases were matched 4:1 by age, bilateral, primary or revision procedure, and date of surgery, and availability of 2 year data, after excluding potential controls with ICD-9 codes for other rheumatic disease or fracture. Self-report quality of life and administrative data were obtained pre-operatively and at 2-years. Pain, function, and quality of life scores were compared between groups using standard statistical methods.

Results: 30 eligible AS THR cases were identified between 5/ 2007 and 10/2010: 21 primary, 2 bilateral, and 7 revisions.  Mean age was 52.7 years, (SD 16) ; more AS were male (80% vs 45%; p-value<0.001). AS had worse baseline ASA class (ASA Class≥3: 40% vs 9%; p-value<0.001).  2-year self-report data were available on 63% of AS cases.  AS had worse pre-operative WOMAC pain (46.1 vs 54.8; p-value=0.05) and WOMAC function (43.5 vs 53.7; p-value=0.04) compared to OA controls but had similar excellent outcomes at 2 years: WOMAC pain (90.6 vs 92.8; p-value=0.5) and WOMAC function (85.4 vs 90.4; p-value=0.18). AS were as likely as controls to have a clinically meaningful improvement (Δ WOMAC >10) in pain (87% vs 93%; p-value=0.4) and function (100% vs 90%; p-value=0.2) and were no more likely to have a poor outcome (WOMAC < 60) for pain (89% vs 93%; p-value=0.4) or function (89% vs 93%; p-value=0.5). AS without 2-year data had significantly worse pre-op WOMAC function than AS with data (30.9 vs 44.1; p-value=0.04). However, neither AS nor OA without 2-year data had clinically meaningful differences in pre-op pain scores compared with those with data (AS:45 vs 40; p-value=0.31; OA:53.6 vs. 50.5; p-value<0.001).  AS SF-12 was lower at baseline (31.3 vs. 36.1; p-value=0.01) and remained clinically significantly worse at 2 years (41.5 vs 50.2; p-value<0.001). Scores on the HSS Expectations Survey were high for both AS and OA (77.5 vs 83.3; p-value=0.24), and both were very/somewhat satisfied with their 2-year outcomes (100% vs 96%; p-value=0.4). 

Table 1

Total Hip Replacement

 

AS (n=30)

OA (n=132)

P-value

Age (SD)

52.7 (16.2)

53.2 (14.6)

0.88

Male, n (%)

24 (80%)

59 (45%)

<0.001

WOMAC Baseline Pain (SD)

46.1 (19.3)

54.8 (19.3)

0.05

WOMAC 2 year Pain (SD)

90.6 (14.1)

92.8 (12.9)

0.5

WOMAC Baseline Function (SD)

43.5 (22.4)

53.7 (20.4)

0.04

WOMAC 2 year Function (SD)

85.4 (17.1)

90.4 (14.4)

0.18

Δ WOMAC > 10, Pain, n (%)

13 (87%)

110 (93%)

0.36

Δ WOMAC > 10, Function, n (%)

13 (100%)

96 (90%)

0.23

Poor outcome @ 2 year, WOMAC Pain ≤60, n (%)

2 (11%)

7 (6%)

0.4

Poor outcome @ 2 year, WOMAC Function ≤60, n (%)

2 (11%)

8 (7%)

0.52

SF-12 PCS Baseline (SD)

31.3 (8.4)

36.1 (8.1)

0.015

SF-12 PCS 2 year (SD)

41.5 (11.0)

50.2 (9.8)

<0.001

Expectation Score (SD)

77.5 (17.7)

83.3 (18.1)

0.24

Baseline ASA class, n (%)

 

 

<0.001

Class 1 or 2

18 (60%)

119 (91%)

 

Class 3

12 (40%)

12 (9%)

 

Satisfaction at 2 years, Overall, n (%)

 

 

 

Very Satisfied

14 (78%)

102 (86%)

0.42

Somewhat Satisfied

4 (22%)

12 (10%)

 

Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied

0 (0%)

2 (2%)

 

 Somewhat Dissatisfied

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 

Very Dissatisfied

0 (0%)

3 (3%)

 

Conclusion: AS patients achieve similar levels of pain relief at 2-years compared with OA controls. These data may overestimate 2-year function in AS, but the majority have significant improvement.  Despite having worse pre-operative health status than matched OA controls, THR is an effective treatment for end stage hip arthritis in AS.   However, lower 2-year SF-12 PCS scores suggest that some limitations due to health status persist. These data can be used to ensure AS patients have accurate expectations of THR.


Disclosure:

S. M. Goodman,
None;

R. Zhu,
None;

W. T. Huang,
None;

M. P. Figgie,

Mekanika,

1,

Ethicon,

2;

M. Alexiades,
None;

L. A. Mandl,

Boehringer Ingelheim,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/total-hip-replacement-outcomes-in-ankylosing-spondylitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology