ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2336

Patients with Psoriasis with a Positive Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST): Similarities and Differences Compared to PsA and Patients with Psoriasis and a Negative PEST

Alexis Ogdie1, William Song2, Joel Gelfand2, Sarah Lonowski3, Rebecca Schumacher4 and Kaleb Michaud3, 1Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 3University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 4Forward Databank, Witchita, KS

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: SpA Including PsA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Identifying patients at risk for developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may allow for accelerated diagnosis and treatment and improve long term outcomes for these patients. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) was developed to identify patients in a dermatology or primary care clinic that should be screened for PsA. We have previously found that the PEST score may be associated with a higher probability for developing PsA. The objective of this study was to examine, in a patient-centered psoriasis registry, the characteristics of patients with a positive PEST screen to those with PsA and those with a negative PEST.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using baseline data from the Forward Psoriasis Registry, a longitudinal cohort of patients with psoriasis to understand risk for PsA and cardiometabolic disease launched in August 2023. Participants were recruited from US dermatology clinics with dermatologist-diagnosed psoriasis from August 2023 to June 2024. The enrollment questionnaire contains information on psoriasis severity and impact, quality of life, comorbidities, treatment and treatment satisfaction. Participants were age 18 and older and were not required to be on therapy for psoriasis. All variables including diagnosis of PsA were participant reported. We descriptively report demographics, disease characteristics, current treatments, and comorbidities for participants at enrollment by PEST positivity (a score of 3 or more out of 5 items) and PsA diagnosis.

Results: Among 1,269 participants, 1,245 completed a PEST survey and among these 349 (28%) reported a diagnosis of PsA; 249 (20%) had a positive PEST (PEST+) but did not report a diagnosis of PsA, and 647 (52%) had a negative PEST (PEST-) and did not report a PsA diagnosis. Mean age and sex distribution was similar among the groups. Psoriasis characteristics were generally similar although more patients with PsA and PsA-/PEST+ reported nail disease (~75% vs 46% in PEST- group), slightly more moderate to severe psoriasis in the PsA and PEST+ groups, and patients with PsA were more likely to report genital psoriasis and inverse psoriasis. Biologic therapies were more commonly used among patients with PsA compared to those without a PsA diagnosis. A subset of PEST+ participants reported diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis and reactive arthritis.

Conclusion: Among participants in this prospective psoriasis registry, those who were PEST+ were similar to those with a diagnosis of PsA in terms of psoriasis characteristics and comorbidities. PEST may serve as a proxy for PsA or PsA risk in longitudinal cohort studies, however some patients may have competing diagnoses or other forms of arthritis. The use of PEST as a predictor of PsA will be prospectively tested in this cohort.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Patient characteristics, comorbidities and treatment

Supporting image 2

Figure 1: Differences in PEST item answers (panel A) and psoriasis characteristics (panel B) by group. The three groups are mutually exclusive: Participants with PsA may have had a positive or negative PEST. Participants labeled as PEST+ or PEST- reported not having a diagnosis of PsA.


Disclosures: A. Ogdie: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Celgene, 2, CorEvitas, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Happify Health, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2; W. Song: None; J. Gelfand: Abbvie, Artax (DSMB), BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celldex (DSMB), FIDE (which is sponsored by multiple pharmaceutical companies) GSK, Inmagene (DSMB), 2, Amgen, BMS, and Pfizer Inc, 5, Healio Dermatology, 12, Chief Medical Editor, International Psoriasis Council, 1, 12, Board of Directors, no honoraria, other, 12, Dr. Gelfand is a co-patent holder of resiquimod for treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma.; S. Lonowski: BMS, 2, Eli Lilly, 2; R. Schumacher: None; K. Michaud: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ogdie A, Song W, Gelfand J, Lonowski S, Schumacher R, Michaud K. Patients with Psoriasis with a Positive Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST): Similarities and Differences Compared to PsA and Patients with Psoriasis and a Negative PEST [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-with-psoriasis-with-a-positive-psoriasis-epidemiology-screening-tool-pest-similarities-and-differences-compared-to-psa-and-patients-with-psoriasis-and-a-negative-pest/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-with-psoriasis-with-a-positive-psoriasis-epidemiology-screening-tool-pest-similarities-and-differences-compared-to-psa-and-patients-with-psoriasis-and-a-negative-pest/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology