ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2264

The Risk of Malignancy and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events with the Use of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Evidence

Majeed Haider1, Osama Alalwan2 and Helen Harris3, 1Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, Bahrain, 2Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain, Bahrain, 3NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: RA – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is the first Janus Kinase Inhibitor (JAKi) approved for treating adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recently, its use has been linked to an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and malignancy. These concerns emerged from the findings of the oral surveillance trial, which is a mandated post-authorization safety trial designed to assess the risk of MACE and malignancy in JAKi versus Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (TNFi) patients (1). We aimed to investigate whether these concerns have been replicated in real world settings. Our objective was to quantify the risk of MACE, overall malignancies, and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) associated with the use of JAKi versus TNFi in RA patients in daily clinical practice settings.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science). Databases were searched from inception until March 30th, 2024. Only observational cohort studies that assessed the risk of MACE and malignancy in JAKi versus TNFi in adult RA patients were retrieved. A quantitative data synthesis was carried out using a random effects model with the inverse variance method to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Risk of bias in eligible studies was assessed using Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies – of Interventions (ROBINS-1) tool created by the Cochrane collaboration (2). This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024525148).

Results: Thirty-five studies describing a total of more than 350,000 patients were eligible for our study. Most patients were female and above 50 years of age on average. Geographically, 14 studies were from Asia, 13 from Europe, 7 from North America, and 1 from Oceania. Tofacitinib was evaluated solely against TNFi in 14 studies. Baricitinib and Upadacitinib were included in 16 and 6 studies, respectively. Around half of the studies were judged as low risk of bias based on the ROBINS-I tool.  The results of data synthesis showed a HR of 0.95 [0.84–1.07], 0.97 [0.90–1.04], and 1.17 [1.07–1.28] (Figures 1,2, and 3, respectively) for the risk of MACE, malignancy and NMSC in JAKi versus TNFi patients.

Conclusion: JAKi were not associated with increased risk of MACE or malignancy when compared to TNFi in a real-world setting. However, JAKi were associated with a small increased risk of NMSC.

References

1.          R. YS, L. BD, R. MT, G. KG, Roy F, L. RJ, et al. Cardiovascular and Cancer Risk with Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2022 Jan 26;386(4):316–26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2109927

2.          Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ [Internet]. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/355/bmj.i4919.abstract

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Meta-analysis for the Risk of MACE in JAKi versus TNFi.

Supporting image 2

Figure 2: Meta-analysis for the Risk of malignancy in JAKi versus TNFi.

Supporting image 3

Figure 3: Meta-analysis for the Risk of NMSC in JAKi versus TNFi.


Disclosures: M. Haider: AbbVie/Abbott, 12, Sponsorship to attend EULAR meeting, Janssen, 6, Novartis, 6; O. Alalwan: AbbVie/Abbott, 6, 12, Sponsorship for attending EULAR meeting 2024; H. Harris: Eli Lilly, 5, Gilead, 1, Novartis, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Haider M, Alalwan O, Harris H. The Risk of Malignancy and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events with the Use of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Evidence [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-risk-of-malignancy-and-major-adverse-cardiovascular-events-with-the-use-of-janus-kinase-inhibitors-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-real-world-eviden/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-risk-of-malignancy-and-major-adverse-cardiovascular-events-with-the-use-of-janus-kinase-inhibitors-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-real-world-eviden/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology