ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1489

Lupus Nephritis Clinical and Serological Responses at 12 Months: Implications for Repeat Biopsy, Intensified Immunosuppression or Additional Anti-proteinuric Therapy

H Michael Belmont1, Brooke Cohen2, Amit Saxena2, Peter Izmirly3 and Jill Buyon4, 1NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, 2NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 3New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 4New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Lupus nephritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: LN treatment goal is to suppress immune mediated injury and preserve eGFR. Studies indicate proteinuria < 700 at 12 months predicts maintaining eGFR at 7 or 10 years explaining the EULAR target. Proteinuria is reduced by effective immunosuppression (IS) or drugs that reduce proteinuria regardless of pathology(RASi, MRA, SGLT2i, or GLP1-RA). It is uncertain which patients at 1 year are candidates for repeat biopsy, intensified IS or additional anti-proteinuria drug(s). We hypothesize that these decisions will be assisted by assessing proteinuria and serological responses. 

Methods: Identified patients in NYU SLE Registry with biopsy proven LN and data at 12 months after induction treatment 4/2017 – 4/2024. Data collected included demographics, dsDNA (DNA) by multiplex, C3/C4 by nephelometry, uPCR, CRR (uPCR< 500), SRR (uPCR< 700), PRR (uPCR< 50% baseline) and urine sediment.  Relied on KDIGO 2012 heat map to determine CKD  progression risk that categorizes magnitude of proteinuria relying on uACR, which we generated by using uPCR x 0.6,  in association with eGFR. 

Results: 126 LN:115(92%) female, 45(36%) white, 38(30.4%) black, 23(18%) asian, and 38(30.4%) Hispanic Table 1. Only 21(16.7%) had a complete serological response with normalization of DNA and complement while 19(15.1%) had both elevated DNA and hypocomplementemia. Most frequent outcome was abnormal DNA but no hypocomplementemia in 47(37.3 %). In 22(17.5%) DNA elevated with low C3 or C4 but not both. In 17(13.5%) DNA normal with hypocomplementemia (low C3 or C4 or low C3 and C4)Table 2. 88(69.8%) on RASi, 4 (3.1%)SGL2i, 9(7.1%) MRA and 0 GLP1-RA Table 1. CRR achieved 60(47.6%), SRR 10(7.9%), and PRR 27(21.4%) Table 1. 103(81.7%) of patients had uACR > 300 and 47(37.3%) 30-300. 25(19.8%) patients uPCR > 700 and abnormal urine sediment.  Based on proteinuria and eGFR only 13 patients had no risk for CKD progression, while 38 moderate, 56 high, and 19 very high risk Figure 1. 49 with either normal eGFR or only mildly decreased eGFR (60-89) at high risk due to magnitude of proteinuria. Very high risk in 12 based on serological activity and uPCR > 700. 25(19.8%) had uPCR > 700 and  abnormal urine sediment. Another 9(7.1%) patients had normal serology and urine sediment, but uPCR > 700.

Conclusion: In a real world LN cohort complete serological responses are infrequent at 12 months. CRR, SRR or PRR are common and only 21.1% of  patients without any clinical response defined by reduction in proteinuria. However, due to magnitude of proteinuria many remain at risk for CKD progression. Based on persistent serological activity or abnormal urine sediment and uPCR > 700 many patients are candidates for repeat biopsy to assess for suspected ongoing immune injury. Moreover, patients are eligible for anti-proteinuric medication based on normal serology and urine sediment, but uPCR > 700. Additional patients would be eligible for drug to reduce proteinuria if adopt stringent uACR goal, as in diabetic kidney disease, with target uACR < 300 or < 30, regardless of eGFR. Future data can clarify long term proteinuria target in patients with Grade 2 or worse CKD. At this time, clinical and serological responses at 12 months can clarify role of repeat biopsy, intensified IS, or drug for proteinuria reduction.

Supporting image 1

Clinical Characteristics

Supporting image 2

Serological Responses at One Year

Supporting image 3

KDIGO 2021 Heat Map: Risk for progression to chronic kidney disease based on albuminuria and eGFR


Disclosures: H. Belmont: Alexion, 1, Aurinia, 6; B. Cohen: None; A. Saxena: AbbVie, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein, 2, Lilly, 2, Synthekine, 2; P. Izmirly: Hansoh Bio, 2; J. Buyon: Artiva Biotherapeutics, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 2, Equillium, 1, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 2, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, 1, Related Sciences, 1, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Belmont H, Cohen B, Saxena A, Izmirly P, Buyon J. Lupus Nephritis Clinical and Serological Responses at 12 Months: Implications for Repeat Biopsy, Intensified Immunosuppression or Additional Anti-proteinuric Therapy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lupus-nephritis-clinical-and-serological-responses-at-12-months-implications-for-repeat-biopsy-intensified-immunosuppression-or-additional-anti-proteinuric-therapy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lupus-nephritis-clinical-and-serological-responses-at-12-months-implications-for-repeat-biopsy-intensified-immunosuppression-or-additional-anti-proteinuric-therapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology