ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2245

Drug Survival of Risankizumab vs Other Biologics After 13 Months of Treatment Among Patients with PsA in the Multicountry Postmarketing Observational VALUE Study

Lars Erik1, Kim A Papp2, Andrew Östör3, Vassilis Stakias4, Tshepiso Madihlaba4, Ralph Lippe5, Ran Liu4 and Diamant Thaçi6, 1Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Vedbæk, Denmark, 2Alliance Clinical Research and Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Monash University & Emeritus Research; Australian National University, Melbourne, Australia, 4AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, 5AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany, 6Institute and Comprehensive Center for Inflammation Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, Interleukins, longitudinal studies, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2227–2256) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment: SpA Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Risankizumab (RZB) is an optimized IL-23 inhibitor (IL-23i) currently approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis (PsO), PsA, and Crohn’s disease. In a post hoc analysis of data from the postmarketing VALUE study in patients with PsO who were treated with RZB or other biologic therapies, we assessed real‑world drug survival for a subgroup of patients also diagnosed with PsA.

Methods: The ongoing, multicountry, prospective observational cohort VALUE study (NCT03982394) enrolled adults (aged ≥ 18 years) who were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe PsO and prescribed RZB or another biologic therapy in accordance with local labeling in a 2:1 ratio. All treatment decisions were made solely by the treating physician. This post hoc analysis included data from the subset of patients with PsO who were also diagnosed with PsA by a rheumatologist and was based on an interim database lock (data cutoff, September 26, 2022). Drug survival was compared for patients receiving RZB vs all other biologics, vs biologics excluding IL-23i, vs TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi), and vs IL-17 inhibitors (IL‑17i). The probability of drug survival was estimated from Kaplan‑Meier curves of time to first drug change (defined as discontinuation of the prescribed biologic treatment or changing to a different biologic treatment). Chi-squared tests were used to evaluate the proportion of patients who had drug changes by month 13. Analyses were repeated after propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio using greedy algorithm and exact match for biologic-naive/biologic-experienced status to account for baseline imbalances between comparison groups.

Results: A total of 244 (RZB) and 189 (other biologics) patients diagnosed with PsO and PsA were included in this analysis. Baseline demographics and characteristics were generally comparable between groups, except patients prescribed RZB vs other biologics were older (median age, 55 vs 51 years, P = .02) and more likely to have prior biologic therapy experience (67.4% vs 43.4%, P < .001). At month 13, fewer patients prescribed RZB had drug changes (5.5%) vs patients prescribed other biologics (19.0%), other biologics excluding IL-23i (20.5%), TNFi (26.7%), and IL‑17i (16.4%; P < .001 for all comparisons). The estimated probability of drug survival [95% CI] at 13 months was higher among patients receiving RZB (95.3% [91.1%, 97.5%]) vs other biologics (80.9% [73.7%, 86.3%]; Figure 1); RZB vs biologics excluding IL-23i (78.9% [70.9%, 85.0%]; Figure 2), or RZB vs TNFi and IL-17i (72.5% [57.3%, 83.1%] and 82.4% [72.0%, 89.2%]; Figure 3). Similar results were observed after PSM (estimated probability of drug survival [95% CI] at 13 months for RZB, 94.8% [88.7%, 97.6%]; other biologics, 84.8% [76.3%, 90.4%]; biologics excluding IL-23i, 82.4% [72.4%, 89.0%]; TNFi, 82.7% [63.2%, 92.4%]; and IL‑17i, 82.8% [69.5%, 90.7%]).

Conclusion: Patients with PsO and PsA who were treated with RZB in the real-world setting experienced fewer drug changes and a higher probability of drug survival compared with those treated with other biologic therapies. These results can help inform clinician decision making when initiating biologic treatment in patients with PsA.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: L. Erik: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Biogen, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; K. Papp: AbbVie, 1, 2, 5, 6, Akros, 1, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 1, 2, 5, 6, Anacor, 1, 2, 5, 6, Arcutis, 1, 2, 5, 6, Astellas, 1, 2, 5, 6, Bausch Health/Valeant, 1, 2, 5, 6, Baxalta, 1, 2, 5, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, 2, 5, 6, Can-Fite Biopharma, 1, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 1, 2, 5, 6, Coherus, 1, 2, 5, 6, Dermira, 1, 2, 5, 6, Dow Pharma, 1, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, Evelo, 1, 2, 5, 6, Forward Pharma, 5, Galapagos, 1, 2, 5, 6, Galderma, 1, 2, 5, 6, Genentech, 1, 2, 5, 6, Gilead, 1, 2, 5, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein, 1, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 1, 2, 5, 6, Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, 1, 2, 5, 6, LEO Pharma, 1, 2, 5, 6, MedImmune, 1, 2, 5, 6, Meiji Seika Pharma, 1, 2, 5, 6, Merck-Serono, 1, 2, 5, 6, Mitsubishi Pharma, 1, 2, 5, 6, Moberg Pharma, 1, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 1, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, 6, PRCL Research, 1, 2, 5, 6, Regeneron, 1, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 1, 2, 5, 6, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, 1, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 1, 2, 5, 6, Takeda, 1, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 1, 2, 5, 6; A. Östör: AbbVie, 12, has served as a consultant and/or on advisory boards and/or undertaken clinical trials, GSK, 12, has served as a consultant and/or on advisory boards and/or undertaken clinical trials, Janssen, 12, has served as a consultant and/or on advisory boards and/or undertaken clinical trials, Lilly, 12, has served as a consultant and/or on advisory boards and/or undertaken clinical trials, Novartis, 12, has served as a consultant and/or on advisory boards and/or undertaken clinical trials, Pfizer, 12, has served as a consultant and/or on advisory boards and/or undertaken clinical trials; V. Stakias: AbbVie, 3, 11; T. Madihlaba: AbbVie, 3, 11; R. Lippe: AbbVie, 3, 11; R. Liu: AbbVie, 3, 11; D. Thaçi: AbbVie, 1, 2, 5, 12, Investigator, Almirall, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Amgen, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Celltrion, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Galapagos, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Galderma, 1, 2, 5, 12, Investigator, Janssen-Cilag, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, LEO Pharma, 1, 2, 5, 12, Investigator, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, 12, Investigator, Pfizer, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Regeneron, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Samsung, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Sandoz, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Sanofi, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, Target-Solution, 1, 2, 12, Investigator, UCB, 1, 2, 12, Investigator.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Erik L, Papp K, Östör A, Stakias V, Madihlaba T, Lippe R, Liu R, Thaçi D. Drug Survival of Risankizumab vs Other Biologics After 13 Months of Treatment Among Patients with PsA in the Multicountry Postmarketing Observational VALUE Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/drug-survival-of-risankizumab-vs-other-biologics-after-13-months-of-treatment-among-patients-with-psa-in-the-multicountry-postmarketing-observational-value-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/drug-survival-of-risankizumab-vs-other-biologics-after-13-months-of-treatment-among-patients-with-psa-in-the-multicountry-postmarketing-observational-value-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology