ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1993

Geographic Variations Of Gout Epidemiology In The United Kingdom: A Nationwide Population Study

Chang-Fu Kuo1,2, Michael Doherty3, Matthew J. Grainge4 and Weiya Zhang1, 1Academic Rheumatology, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 2Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, 3Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 4Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Community Health Sciences,, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: To examine geographic variations of gout prevalence, incidence and management in the United Kingdom.

 Methods: We used the Clinical Practice Research Data-link (CPRD) to estimate the prevalence, incidence of gout, consultation rate for gout, percentage under urate-lowering treatment (ULT) and time to first prescription of ULT in each of 13 areas in the United Kingdom: North East, North West, Yorkshire & The Humber, East Midlands, West Midlands, East of England, South West, South Central, London, South East Coast, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.

Results: Overall prevalence of gout was 2.51% (95% CI, 2.50%‒2.52%) and incidence was 1.87 (95% CI, 1.83‒1.91) per 1000 person-years in the UK in 2012. The prevalence and incidence vary throughout the country (Figure 1). The highest prevalence was in North East (3.11% [3.00%‒3.23%]) and Wales (2.98% [2.93‒3.03]); the highest incidence as also in these 2 regions (2.30 [95% CI, 2.26‒2.35] and 2.20 [95% CI, 2.15‒2.24] per 1,000 patient-years respectively). Among prevalent gout patients in 2012, only 50,453 patients (43.6%) were under medical attention (with at least one consultation with a gout diagnosis or a prescription containing ULT). Management of gout in terms of percentage given ULT also varies between regions, partially in line with the variation of prevalence (Table 1). In general only one-third of prevalent cases were given ULT, and only one quarter of incident cases received ULT within one year from diagnosis.

Conclusion: A regional variation of gout prevalence and incidence in the UK was observed. Only a minority of people with gout receive ULT and this aspect of gout management also varied between regions, suggesting a need for further education of general practitioners with respect to understanding of gout and its mangement.

 

Figure 1. Geographic variations in the prevalence and incidence of gout

Table 1. Regional variation in gout management of gout in the United Kingdom in 2012

Area

Prevalent cases

Incident cases

Consulted

Treated by ULT

ULT by 6 months

ULT by 12 months

Overall

43.8%

31.1%

16.1%

23.3%

   North East

36.4%

37.7%

16.6%

20.2%

   North West

43.2%

31.8%

19.2%

26.7%

   Yorkshire & The Humber

39.0%

24.9%

8.6%

16.0%

   East Midlands

44.5%

25.7%

6.6%

10.3%

   West Midlands

38.2%

27.5%

14.4%

20.6%

   East of England

44.1%

32.3%

14.7%

21.8%

   South West

37.1%

29.6%

11.4%

18.3%

   South Central

44.2%

26.0%

12.6%

17.9%

   London

43.9%

35.1%

18.0%

28.0%

   South East Coast

37.7%

30.6%

17.0%

23.9%

   Northern Ireland

46.7%

29.3%

18.0%

24.7%

   Scotland

65.9%

37.8%

22.1%

30.1%

   Wales

44.7%

30.7%

15.1%

21.1%

 


Disclosure:

C. F. Kuo,
None;

M. Doherty,
None;

M. J. Grainge,
None;

W. Zhang,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/geographic-variations-of-gout-epidemiology-in-the-united-kingdom-a-nationwide-population-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology