ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1412

Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Through 6 Months of Guselkumab Treatment in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Real-World Data from the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis (PsA/SpA) Registry

Philip J. Mease1, Alexis R Ogdie2, John Tesser3, Natalie shiff4, Iris Lin5, Soumya Chakravarty6, Mike Kelleman7, Rhiannon Dodge7, Robert McLean7, Aaron Broadwell8, Arthur Kavanaugh9 and Joseph F. Merola10, 1Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 3Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, Phoenix, AZ, 4Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC / Adjunct, Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Horsham, PA, 5Janssen, Horsham, PA, 6Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC / Division of Rheumatology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Villanova, PA, 7CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, 8Department of Rheumatology, Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Specialists, Shreveport, LA, 9Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 10Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biologicals, Disease Activity, Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis, registry

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1412–1441) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II: SpA

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS) has demonstrated significant efficacy across disease domains in controlled clinical trials of patients (pts) with active PsA.1,2 Recent CorEvitas PsA/SpA Registry analyses confirmed real-world GUS effectiveness, showing that pts with persistent on-label GUS use at 6 months had significant mean improvements from baseline (BL) in peripheral joint and skin symptoms and pt-reported pain.3 Here we report secondary findings from the CorEvitas PsA/SpA Registry further assessing changes in pt-reported outcomes (PROs) among pts with persistent GUS use from BL through the 6-month visit (On-Label GUS Persisters).

Methods: This analysis includes registry pts who initiated on-label GUS after FDA approval for active PsA (7/13/2020; 100 mg SC at Weeks 0 & 4 then Q8W) and were On-Label Persisters. Demographics, PsA disease activity, PROs, and medication history at GUS initiation (BL visit) were summarized descriptively. Among On-Label GUS Persisters not meeting response criteria at BL, response rates at 6 months were determined for established outcomes related to improvements or achievement of low levels of disease activity in pt-reported pain (0-100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]), pt global assessment of arthritis + psoriasis (PtGA; 0-100 mm VAS), and HAQ-DI (0-3). Unadjusted, nominal p-values were calculated using a single-proportion, one-sided test to determine if response at the 6-month visit differed from 0% at BL. Mean (95% CI) change from BL to 6 months was determined for fatigue (0-100 mm VAS); nominal p-value calculated using a paired t-test at α=0.05.

Results: Among 114 on-label GUS initiators with a 6-month follow-up visit, 90 (79%) had persistent on-label GUS use. On average, pts had longstanding, treatment-resistant, active PsA (Table 1). BL pt-reported pain, HAQ-DI, and fatigue scores were 57.0, 0.9, and 56.5, respectively. Substantial proportions of On-Label GUS Persisters experienced clinically meaningful improvements in pain (38% with ≥30% reduction and 40% with ≥15-mm reduction), overall joint and skin disease (47% with ≥15-mm reduction in PtGA), and physical function (30% with HAQ-DI improvement ≥0.35; all nominal p< 0.001; Figure 1). Further, up to one quarter of pts achieved the more stringent thresholds of response, generally representing a major response or minimal disease activity, including 22% with ≥50% reduction in pain, 18% with pain score ≤15 mm, 26% with PtGA score ≤20 mm, and 10% with HAQ-DI ≤0.5 (all nominal p< 0.001; Figure 2). Mean change (95% CI) in fatigue from BL at 6 months was -8.8 (-14.9, -2.7; nominal p=0.005).

Conclusion: In this real-world population of pts with treatment-resistant active PsA and persistent on-label GUS use, consistent with prior results for physician-reported endpoints of joint and skin disease, pts reported meaningful improvements in pain, physical function, and fatigue. These represent difficult-to-treat domains that are important contributors to pts’ health-related quality of life.

References:

1Deodhar. Lancet 2020;395:1115-25
2Mease. Lancet 2020;395:1126-36
3Mease. 6-M Persistence and Multi-Domain Effectiveness of GUS in Adults with PsA: RW Data from the CorEvitas Registry [abstr]. Maui Derm; June 21-24, 2023; Colorado Springs, CO

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, Aclaris, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, Inmagene, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Pharma, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6, Ventyx, 2, Xinthera, 2; A. Ogdie: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Celgene, 2, CorEvitas, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Gilead, 2, GSK, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2; J. Tesser: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Alpine, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Anthrosi Therapeutics, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, Aurinia, 2, 6, Bendcare, 5, Biogen, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 5, Corevitas, 5, CSL Behring, 5, DRL, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Emerald, 5, Exagen, 5, Genentech, 5, 6, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK), 2, 6, Global Health Living Foundation, 5, Horizon, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Kolon TissueGene, 5, Mitsubishi, 5, Nēsos, 5, Novartis, 2, Organogenesis, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, 6, Sanumen/Biosplice, 2, 5, Selecta, 5, Setpoint, 5, Sun Pharma, 5, Takeda, 5, UCB, 2; N. shiff: AbbVie, 11, Gilead, 11, Iovance, 11, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11, Novo-Nordisc, 11, Pfizer, 11; I. Lin: Janssen, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; S. Chakravarty: Janssen Scientific Affairs, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; M. Kelleman: CorEvitas, LLC, 3; R. Dodge: CorEvitas, LLC, 3; R. McLean: CorEvitas, LLC, 3, 11; A. Broadwell: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Aurinia, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Horizon, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Mallinckrodt, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Radius, 6, Sandoz, 2, Sanofi/Regeneron, 6, UCB, 6; A. Kavanaugh: Amgen, 2, BMS, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2; J. Merola: AbbVie, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Dermavant, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Eli Lilly, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Janssen, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, LEO Pharma, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Novartis, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Pfizer, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Regeneron, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Sanofi, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Sun Pharmaceuticals, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, UCB Pharma, 12, Consultant and/or investigator.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease P, Ogdie A, Tesser J, shiff N, Lin I, Chakravarty S, Kelleman M, Dodge R, McLean R, Broadwell A, Kavanaugh A, Merola J. Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Through 6 Months of Guselkumab Treatment in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Real-World Data from the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis (PsA/SpA) Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improvements-in-patient-reported-outcomes-through-6-months-of-guselkumab-treatment-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-real-world-data-from-the-corevitas-psoriatic-arthritis-spondyloarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improvements-in-patient-reported-outcomes-through-6-months-of-guselkumab-treatment-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-real-world-data-from-the-corevitas-psoriatic-arthritis-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology