ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1338

The Advantage of Tight Control and Treat-to-Target in New-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Daily Rheumatology Practice: Results from a Contemporary University Clinic Inception Cohort

Katarina Friberger Pajalic1, Jon Thorkel Einarsson1, Caroline Bengtsson2, Ellen Landgren3, Elisabeth Mogard4, Carmen Roseman5, Johan Karlsson Wallman4, Elisabet Lindqvist4, Tor Olofsson4 and Meliha Kapetanovic4, 1Lund University, Institution for clinical sciences, section for rheumatology Lund and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden, 2Lund University Hospital, section for rheumatology, Lund, Sweden, 3Lund University, Institution for clinical sciences, section for rheumatology Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden, 4Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden, 5Lund University, Institution for clinical sciences, section for rheumatology Lund and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: registry, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1308–1344) RA – Treatments Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Since 2018, all patients with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at the Department of Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden, are invited to participate in a ”tight control” and ”treat-to-target” (TC+T2T ) follow-up strategy. This strategy includes follow-up visits to a rheumatologist (at diagnosis and 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months) plus physical/telephone consultations with a rheumatology nurse between physician visits – both with disease activity assessments and, if needed, adjustment of anti-rheumatic treatment, aiming for remission. The aim of the current study was to explore the possible advantages of implementing this TC+T2T strategy over routine care in reaching remission (DAS28 < 2.6, DAS28CRP < 2.4 or CDAI≤2.8) in clinical practice of new-onset RA patients.

Methods: RA patients with symptom duration < 24 months at diagnosis were eligible. Data on disease and treatment characteristics, as well as outcome measures during follow-up, were retrieved from the Swedish Rheumatology Quality register (SRQ). In total, 336 patients entered one of the follow-up strategies between January 1, 2018, and October 31, 2022. Of these, 193 were followed according to the TC+T2T strategy and 143 according to routine care. Percentage females/mean age/mean symptom duration at inclusion were 75%/56 years/4.5 months (TC+T2T) and 71%/62 years/7.6 months (routine care). Achievement of remission was compared between the two strategies using logistic regression, adjusted for sex, age, symptom duration, and DAS28/DAS28CRP/CDAI at diagnosis. In addition, changes in patient-reported outcomes (fatigue and pain) were assessed for the respective strategies.

Results: Disease and treatment characteristics at diagnosis are summarized in Table1.

Percentages of patients reaching DAS28, DAS28CRP and CDAI remission criteria increased in both groups over time, but this was more pronounced in the TC+T2T group (Figure). A similar pattern was seen in the dynamics of fatigue and pain (Figure). Follow-up according to the TC+T2T was associated with a numerical higher odds ratio of achieving remission at all follow-up times regardless the remission criteria used and a significantly higher odds ratio of CDAI remission at 6 months (after adjustment for sex, age, symptom duration and CDAI at diagnosis) (Table 2).

Conclusion: Compared to routine rheumatology care, the implementation of a ”tight control” and ”treat-to-target” strategy resulted in numerically larger proportions of patients reaching remission at majority of follow-up visits over two years. Similarly, both strategies showed an early and sustained numerical improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Our results suggest that this type of strategy should be integrated into daily clinical practice of new-onset RA.

Supporting image 1

Disease and treatment characteristics at diagnosis

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3

Achievement of remission between “treat -to-target” strategy and routine rheumatology care ( logistic regression analysis)


Disclosures: K. Friberger Pajalic: None; J. Einarsson: None; C. Bengtsson: None; E. Landgren: None; E. Mogard: AbbVie/Abbott, 6, Novartis, 6; C. Roseman: None; J. Karlsson Wallman: AbbVie, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5; E. Lindqvist: None; T. Olofsson: Merck/MSD, 2, UCB, 2; M. Kapetanovic: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Friberger Pajalic K, Einarsson J, Bengtsson C, Landgren E, Mogard E, Roseman C, Karlsson Wallman J, Lindqvist E, Olofsson T, Kapetanovic M. The Advantage of Tight Control and Treat-to-Target in New-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Daily Rheumatology Practice: Results from a Contemporary University Clinic Inception Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-advantage-of-tight-control-and-treat-to-target-in-new-onset-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-in-daily-rheumatology-practice-results-from-a-contemporary-university-clinic-inception-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-advantage-of-tight-control-and-treat-to-target-in-new-onset-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-in-daily-rheumatology-practice-results-from-a-contemporary-university-clinic-inception-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology