ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1200

Self-Reported Effectiveness of Cannabis for Arthritis-Related Pain

Kristin Wipfler1, Joanna Zeiger2 and Kaleb Michaud3, 1FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Omaha, NE, 2Canna Research Foundation, Boulder, CO, 3University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: pain, Patient reported outcomes, registry, Therapy, alternative, Therapy, complementary

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1200–1220) Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Pain management remains a significant challenge for individuals with rheumatic diseases (RDs), often causing patients to seek complementary or alternative treatments to traditional medications. Cannabis has been investigated as a potential option due to its immunomodulatory and analgesic effects, and arthritic pain is a commonly reported reason for cannabis use.1 However, little is known about its safety or effectiveness in this population, and existing products are incredibly diverse and often unregulated. The objective of this study was to assess differences in self-reported effectiveness of cannabis or cannabis-derived products (hereafter simply “cannabis”) for the treatment of arthritis-related pain by the presence or absence of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

Methods: The study population included adults in the FORWARD Databank who reported use of cannabis for treating arthritis-related pain. Participants were categorized into two groups: those who used products containing cannabidiol (CBD) but not THC, and those who used products containing THC with or without CBD. Univariate analyses were performed to examine differences between these groups, as well as between those who found cannabis effective or ineffective. Characteristics that varied significantly (chi-square or t-test p< 0.05) were included in a multivariable logistic regression model to assess the relationship between the presence of THC and effectiveness of cannabis in treating arthritic pain.

Results: Among 1,718 participants using cannabis for arthritis-related pain, 811 used THC-containing products while 907 used CBD-only products. In univariate analysis, THC users were significantly more likely to find cannabis effective compared to CBD-only users (62% v 39%, p< 0.001; Figure 1). THC users were younger, more likely to be male, more likely to live in a state where cannabis is legal, more likely to smoke, vape, or ingest cannabis, less likely to use topical cannabis, and more likely to use cannabis for other reasons in addition to pain relief (Table 1). After adjusting for confounders, logistic regression showed that participants using cannabis products with THC had significantly higher odds of finding cannabis effective for pain reduction (OR 2.2 [1.5, 3.1]; p< 0.001; Figure 2). Participants who used topical cannabis or who also used cannabis to treat insomnia or anxiety had significantly higher odds of finding cannabis effective, while participants with higher global VAS scores were less likely to find cannabis effective.

Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the use of cannabis for pain management in individuals with RDs. Our findings suggest that cannabis products containing THC and/or that are applied topically are more likely to be perceived by patients as effective. These results highlight the importance of considering the specific formulation of cannabis products as well as their route of administration when evaluating their therapeutic potential. Prospective studies, particularly randomized controlled clinical trials, are needed to better understand efficacy and potential risks of cannabis use in this population.

1. Wipfler, K. et al. Arthritis Care & Research74, 2091–2099 (2022)

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: K. Wipfler: None; J. Zeiger: None; K. Michaud: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wipfler K, Zeiger J, Michaud K. Self-Reported Effectiveness of Cannabis for Arthritis-Related Pain [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/self-reported-effectiveness-of-cannabis-for-arthritis-related-pain/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/self-reported-effectiveness-of-cannabis-for-arthritis-related-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology