ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0768

Using Participatory Design-Thinking Process to Create a More Applicant-Centered Rheumatology Fellowship Interview Experience

Alick Feng, Ayesha Iftekhar, Ruoning Ni, Gatra Gheriani and Bharat Kumar, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Education

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Professional Education

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: Design-thinking is a creative problem-solving process used to better understand users’ needs and experiences so that a product or service can be improved. Its emphasis on empathy, iterative prototyping, and participatory collaboration make it an ideal methodology for innovation in medical education. We apply this framework to refine the virtual rheumatology fellowship interview process, a relatively new and ad hoc development emerging as a necessity during the COVID pandemic, so that virtual interviews can become more applicant-centered.

Methods: This educational quality improvement project uses a design-thinking framework to identify opportunities and challenges for rheumatology fellowship applicants. The investigators use the 5-step process (Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test) and incorporate rapid qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews to innovate the interview experience. The iterative and collaborative nature of this process has empowered participants to co-design an applicant-centered interview experience.

Results: Interviews with fellowship applicants (n=9), fellow physicians (n=4), and faculty members (n=3) identified three major dynamics of the interview process: (1) Is it a safe environment to ask questions? (2) how do I exchange information effectively? and (3) how do I fit all this data into the bigger picture? Creative brainstorming techniques at a series of 3 workshops yielded 4 prototypes emphasizing customization, hybridization, facilitation, and preparation. A finalized applicant-centered interview template was devised in preparation for the 2023-2024 application season.

Conclusion: Design-thinking has yielded insights into three important dynamics that drive applicant experiences. These insights allow for a redesign of processes so that virtual interviews can be more applicant-centered. This framework allows for further iterations and modifications as the needs of applicants and programs evolve over time.

Supporting image 1

Design-Thinking Principles were employed in an iterative fashion through the five steps in order to create a final set of prototypes for testing

Supporting image 2

Interviews with 9 fellowship candidates revealed a variety of perceptions and observations that were organized into this empathy map. Three major themes predominated: (1) Is this a safe environment for me to ask questions? (2) How can I effectively exchange information? and (3) How do I fit all this data into the bigger picture?

Supporting image 3

As a result of the design-thinking process, four prototypes were conceived emphasizing (1) Facilitation, (2) Customization, (3) Preparation, and (4) Hybridization.


Disclosures: A. Feng: None; A. Iftekhar: None; R. Ni: None; G. Gheriani: None; B. Kumar: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Feng A, Iftekhar A, Ni R, Gheriani G, Kumar B. Using Participatory Design-Thinking Process to Create a More Applicant-Centered Rheumatology Fellowship Interview Experience [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-participatory-design-thinking-process-to-create-a-more-applicant-centered-rheumatology-fellowship-interview-experience/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-participatory-design-thinking-process-to-create-a-more-applicant-centered-rheumatology-fellowship-interview-experience/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology