ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2142

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Of Subcutaneous Tanezumab In Patients With Knee Or Hip Osteoarthritis (NCT00994890)

Leslie Tive1, Eugene J. Dabezies2, Robert J. Fountaine3, Mark T. Brown3, Michael D. Smith3, Kenneth M. Verburg3 and Christine R. West4, 1Arthritis, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 2Pensacola Research Consultants, Pensacola, FL, 3Pfizer, Inc., Groton, CT, 4Clinical Sciences, Pfizer, Williamston, MI

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: monoclonal antibodies, osteoarthritis and pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects II: Symptoms and Therapeutics in Osteoarthritis.

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose : Tanezumab (TNZ), a monoclonal antibody that inhibits nerve growth factor, reduces hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain. A non-controlled, randomized, double-blind study of TNZ 2.5, 5, and 10 mg administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection at 8-week intervals was conducted in patients with hip or knee OA.

Methods: Patients (N=678) with moderate to severe knee or hip OA were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio and treated with TNZ 2.5 mg (n=230), 5 mg (n=222), or 10 mg (n=226) every 8 weeks. Efficacy analyses included change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain and Physical Function subscales, Patient’s Global Assessment of OA (PGAO), and percentage of patients with ≥30%, ≥50%, ≥70%, and ≥90% improvement in WOMAC Pain. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) documentation, physical and neurological examinations, and laboratory tests.

Results: The study discontinued prematurely due to a FDA partial clinical hold on TNZ non-cancer pain studies. Patients received 1 to 4 TNZ doses. Mean study treatment duration was 180, 191, and 187 days for TNZ 2.5, 5, and 10 mg treatment, respectively. TNZ 10 mg and TNZ 5 mg provided similar improvements from Baseline at Weeks 8 and 16 in WOMAC Pain, Physical Function, and PGAO; improvements were greater than with TNZ 2.5 mg. More patients had ≥30%, ≥50%, ≥70%, and ≥90% improvement in WOMAC Pain at Weeks 8 (Figure) and 16 with TNZ 10 and 5 mg than with TNZ 2.5 mg. Overall AE incidence was greatest with TNZ 10 mg (80.1%), followed by TNZ 5 mg (76.1%), and 2.5 mg (68.7%). The most frequently reported AEs were arthralgia, injection site reaction, and paresthesia. Osteonecrosis (ON) was reported as an AE in 4 patients (1.8%) treated with TNZ 10 mg, 4 patients (1.8%) in the TNZ 5 mg group, and 1 patient (0.4%) in the TNZ 2.5 mg group. Thirty-four patients had an all-cause total joint replacement. Of these, 22 (64.7%) events inclusive of the 9 cases of ON were subsequently adjudicated by a blinded external adjudication committee and none were adjudicated to primary ON. The percentage of patients with no new or worsened neurological examination abnormality at last assessment ranged from 82% to 88% across groups.

Conclusion: Overall, SC TNZ provided improvements in Pain, Physical Function, and PGAO at all doses. TNZ 5 and 2.5 mg were better tolerated than TNZ 10 mg.


Disclosure:

L. Tive,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

E. J. Dabezies,

Pfizer Inc,

9;

R. J. Fountaine,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

M. T. Brown,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

M. D. Smith,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

K. M. Verburg,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

C. R. West,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-safety-and-efficacy-of-subcutaneous-tanezumab-in-patients-with-knee-or-hip-osteoarthritis-nct00994890/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology