ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0209

Safety of Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines as a Second Booster Dose in Arthritis Patients on Immunosuppressive Therapies

Hilde Ørbo1, Ingrid Jyssum1, Anne Therese Tveter1, Ingrid Christensen1, Joseph Sexton1, Kristin Hammersbøen Bjørlykke2, Grete B. Kro3, Tore Kvien1, Gunnveig Grødeland4, Ludvig A. Munthe5, Siri Mjaaland6, John Torgils Vaage5, Espen Haavardsholm1, Kristin Kaasen Jørgensen2, Sella Provan7, Silje Watterdal Syversen1 and Guro Goll1, 1Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Department of Gastroenterology, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4Department of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 5Department of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 6Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway, 7Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Cohort Study, COVID-19, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Infection, prevention

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0196–0228) Infection-related Rheumatic Disease Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Safety and efficacy of updated bivalent vaccines, containing both the original vaccine variant of SARS-CoV-2 Spike and either Omicron variants BA.1 or BA.4/5, are of particular interest in arthritis patients on immunosuppressive therapies. With the continuous emergence of new viral variants, it is important to evaluate whether updated vaccines induce more adverse events in this patient group. The objective of this study was examine if a second booster dose with updated bivalent vaccine increases the risk of adverse events, compared to the first booster dose with monovalent vaccines.

Methods: The prospective Nor-vaC study investigates vaccine responses in patients with immune mediated inflammatory diseases using immunosuppressive therapies (1). The present analyses included arthritis patients who received two booster doses. Patients received available vaccines according to the Norwegian vaccination program. The current recommendation in the Norwegian arthritis population is a three-dose primary vaccination series followed by two booster doses. Adverse events following vaccines doses were self-reported through questionnaires. Adverse events following the first (monovalent) and second (bivalent) booster were compared with McNemar’s test.

Results: Between 7th of July 2021 and 6th of December 2022 a total of 243 arthritis patients (127 rheumatoid arthritis, 65 psoriatic arthritis, 51 spondyloarthritis) on immunosuppressive therapies (Table) received a first, monovalent (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273) and a second, bivalent booster dose (BNT162b2 (WT/OMI BA.1), mRNA-1273.214, BNT162b2 (WT/OMI BA.4/BA.5)). Adverse events were recorded within two weeks in all patients (Figure). In total, 45 vs 49 (19% vs 20 %) patients reported any adverse event after a second, bivalent booster dose, compared to the first, monovalent booster, respectively. There was no significant difference in adverse events overall (p= 0.57). The most common adverse events after the second booster were pain at injection site (12 %), flu-like symptoms (9 %) and headache (6 %). No new safety signals emerged. A total of 15 (6 %) patients reported a disease flare after receiving the second, bivalent booster, compared to 21 (8 %) after the first, monovalent booster.

Conclusion: There was no difference in adverse events between the monovalent, first booster, and the bivalent, second booster, indicating that bivalent vaccines are safe in this patient group.

Reference:
1. Syversen S.W. et al Arthritis Rheumatol 2022

Supporting image 1

Figure: Adverse events after bivalent vaccine as a 2nd booster dose compared to a monovalent vaccine as a 1st booster dose.

Supporting image 2

Table: Demographic characteristics and immunosuppressive medication in patients receiving a 1st monovalent and a 2nd bivalent booster dose.


Disclosures: H. Ørbo: None; I. Jyssum: None; A. Tveter: None; I. Christensen: None; J. Sexton: None; K. Bjørlykke: Janssen-Cilag, 6; G. Kro: None; T. Kvien: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, grunenthal, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, sandoz, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; G. Grødeland: AstraZeneca, 1, Bayer, 6, Sanofi, 6, ThermoFisher, 6; L. Munthe: Celgene, 6, Novartis, 6; S. Mjaaland: None; J. Vaage: None; E. Haavardsholm: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Gilead, 2, Pfizer, 6, UCB, 6; K. Jørgensen: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Roche, 6; S. Provan: None; S. Syversen: AstraZeneca, 1; G. Goll: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 6, Galapagos, 1, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 1, Union Chimique Belge, 1, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ørbo H, Jyssum I, Tveter A, Christensen I, Sexton J, Bjørlykke K, Kro G, Kvien T, Grødeland G, Munthe L, Mjaaland S, Vaage J, Haavardsholm E, Jørgensen K, Provan S, Syversen S, Goll G. Safety of Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines as a Second Booster Dose in Arthritis Patients on Immunosuppressive Therapies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-of-bivalent-sars-cov-2-vaccines-as-a-second-booster-dose-in-arthritis-patients-on-immunosuppressive-therapies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-of-bivalent-sars-cov-2-vaccines-as-a-second-booster-dose-in-arthritis-patients-on-immunosuppressive-therapies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology