ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L12

First Line Treatment Using Recombinant IL-1Receptor Antagonist in New Onset Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Is an Effective Treatment Strategy, Irrespective of HLA DRB1 Background

Remco Erkens1, Rashmi Sinha2, Alex Pickering3, Grant Schulert4, Alexei Grom4, Lars van der Veken1, Hanneke van Deutekom1, Jorg Calis1, Jorg van Loosdregt5 and Sebastiaan Vastert1, 1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Systemic JIA Foundation, Cincinnati, OH, 3Systemic JIA Foundation, San Francisso, CA, 4Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 5University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Zeist, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Date of first publication: October 18, 2022

Keywords: Biologicals, genetics, Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Late-Breaking 2022, Still's disease

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: (L07–L17) Late-Breaking Abstract Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) is a severe subtype of JIA. Recently, interstitial lung disease (SJIA-LD) has been reported as a severe complication of sJIA, specifically in the first 2 years of disease. Suggested risk factors for the development of sJIA-ILD are disease onset at young age, the occurrence of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), and adverse drug reactions to biologicals (both IL-1 and IL-6). Adverse drug reactions have recently been associated to HLA DRB1*15 haplotypes. This finding has spurred a debate among pediatric rheumatologist as concerns the use of advises on pre-prescription HLA-typing to guide medication decisions for new onset sJIA patients. Such decisions may include postponing and even forgoing the initiation of effective biological therapy in new onset sJIA patients with HLA-DRB1*15 haplotypes.

Methods: HLA DRB genotyping by whole genome sequencing.

Prospective and standardized treatment cohort study, all started with recombinant IL-1Receptor antagonist (anakinra) as 1st-line therapy/biological.

Results: Our prospective cohort consists of 65 SJIA patients, 53,9% male, mean age at diagnosis of 7.4 years old (range 0.8 to 15.7 yrs). Anakinra was started as 1st line therapy in 60/65 patients, and as 1st line biological in 5/65 (after corticosteroid therapy before referral). In total, 72 % of patients reached a steroid-free inactive disease (complete response) at 6 months and 68% after 1 year. In the first 2 years of disease, 20% of patients developed MAS and 62.5% developed eosinophilia at least at 1 time point (≥ reference values adjusted for age), of which 9/65 (13,8%) patients at time of diagnosis. We found that 17/65 patients (26,1%) carry 1 HLA-DRB1*15:01:01 allele and 21/65 (32,3%) carry HLA DRB1.11 (known risk locus for sJIA). The rate of HLA-DRB1*15:01 in our cohort is comparable to the general European and US population. Of the 17 patients with HLA-DRB1*15:01, one patient developed SJIA-LD during follow-up of at least 2 years. Importantly, the response rate to anakinra in our cohort did not differ significantly between carriers of HLA DRB1*15:01 and non-carriers (figure 1, complete response at 6 months 59% vs 77% p=0.15, complete response at 1 year 52,9% vs 72,9% p=0.13, Chi2). In addition, we observed no significant difference in IL-18 levels at the start of treatment, nor in the occurrence of eosinophilia in the first 2 years between HLA-DRB1*15:01 and non-carriers (figure 2). Two patients had to discontinue anakinra due to adverse reactions to the drug, but both appeared not to be carriers of HLA-DRB1*15:01.

Conclusion: Our cohort showed an HLA DRB1*15:01 carriage of 17/65 (26,1%), comparable to the general population. Although one patient in our cohort developed interstitial lung disease and was a carrier of HLA DRB1*15:01, we did not see differences in the occurrence of eosinophilia and response to anakinra in the first 2 years of disease between HLA DRB1.15 carriers or non-carriers. We suggest not to withhold effective biological therapy in new sJIA patients based on HLA type and only consider (switching to) alternative glucocorticoid based treatment regimens in patients that do not achieve inactive disease.

Supporting image 1

Complete response (clinically inactive disease withouth glucocorticoids) rates stratified to HLA DRB1.15:01 carriage or not.

Supporting image 2

Prevalence of peripheral blood eosinophilia stratified to HLA DRB1.15:01 carriage or not.


Disclosures: R. Erkens, None; R. Sinha, None; A. Pickering, None; G. Schulert, Novartis, Sobi, AB2 Bio, NovImmune; A. Grom, Novartis, Sobi, AB2Bio; L. van der Veken, None; H. van Deutekom, None; J. Calis, None; J. van Loosdregt, None; S. Vastert, Sobi, Novartis.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Erkens R, Sinha R, Pickering A, Schulert G, Grom A, van der Veken L, van Deutekom H, Calis J, van Loosdregt J, Vastert S. First Line Treatment Using Recombinant IL-1Receptor Antagonist in New Onset Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Is an Effective Treatment Strategy, Irrespective of HLA DRB1 Background [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/first-line-treatment-using-recombinant-il-1receptor-antagonist-in-new-onset-systemic-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis-is-an-effective-treatment-strategy-irrespective-of-hla-drb1-background/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/first-line-treatment-using-recombinant-il-1receptor-antagonist-in-new-onset-systemic-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis-is-an-effective-treatment-strategy-irrespective-of-hla-drb1-background/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology