ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1810

Frequency and Patterns of Opioid Use in the Management of Gout: A Population-Based Study

Tuhina Neogi1, Martin Englund2, Aleksandra Turkiewicz2 and Ali Kiadaliri2, 1Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: gout, Health Services Research, pain, practice guidelines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Treatment guidelines for management of gout do not recommend opioids. We evaluated the frequency of opioid prescriptions in those with gout compared with the general population, and evaluated frequency of use of other recommended gout medications

Methods: We used population-based register data from the Skåne region of Sweden to identify adults aged ≥18 years as of Dec 31, 2009 residing in Skåne between 1998-2009 and without a gout diagnosis but at last one in-person healthcare contact during this time. Among this cohort, we identified people with incident gout (date of diagnosis was the index date) using ICD-10 codes between 2010- 2018, and used risk set sampling to age- and sex-match those with gout to those without gout in a 1:5 ratio. We excluded individuals who had a cancer diagnosis in the 5-year period or an opioid prescription in the 2-year period prior to the index date. We evaluated the cumulative incidence, and risk ratio (RR) of new opioid prescriptions within the first year following incident gout diagnosis (index date) among those with gout compared with those without gout, and evaluated the population attributable fraction of opioid prescriptions related to incident gout diagnosis. The regression models were adjusted for potential confounders (see Figures). Among those with gout, we evaluated the RR of recommended gout medications prescribed in the first year after incident gout diagnosis.

Results: We identified 8,293 with incident gout (mean age 65.4, 24.4% women), who were matched to 28,576 comparators without gout (mean age 67.1, 26.6% women). Among those with gout, 13.1% received an opioid prescription during the first year post-index date, while the corresponding frequency was 6.6% in the comparator group (cumulative incidence shown in Figure 1). Of those who received an opioid prescription, codeine combinations (42% in gout; 33% in non-gout), tramadol (18%, 16%), and morphine (12.5%, 15.5%) were the most common opioids prescribed. The highest incidence rate of opioid prescriptions occurred within the first month of incident gout diagnosis compared with the non-gout group, though remained elevated throughout the first year (Figure 2). The population-attributable fraction of opioid prescription related to gout was 15.1% (95% CI 13.1-17.2). Among those with gout, the RR of urate-lowering therapy and other gout flare prescriptions within the first year post-index date was slightly higher among those who had received an opioid prescription than those who did not receive one (Figure 3).

Conclusion: Opioid prescriptions are common within the first year after a gout diagnosis, being at least double compared with the general population without gout, and particularly high in the first month. However, use of recommended gout medications was similar or higher among those who had received an opioid prescription within the first year of gout diagnosis. This suggests that opioids may be prescribed due to lack of adequate effective flare management options.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Cumulative incidence of opioid prescription in first year after gout diagnosis, compared with matched non-gout cohort

Supporting image 2

Risk Ratios of opioid prescription among those with gout in the first year after diagnosis compared with a matched non-gout cohort

Supporting image 3

Risk Ratios of gout-related medications prescribed in the first year after diagnosis among those with gout who received an opioid prescription(s) vs. those with gout who did not


Disclosures: T. Neogi, Novartis, Pfizer/Lilly, Regeneron; M. Englund, None; A. Turkiewicz, None; A. Kiadaliri, Joint Academy®.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Neogi T, Englund M, Turkiewicz A, Kiadaliri A. Frequency and Patterns of Opioid Use in the Management of Gout: A Population-Based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/frequency-and-patterns-of-opioid-use-in-the-management-of-gout-a-population-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/frequency-and-patterns-of-opioid-use-in-the-management-of-gout-a-population-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology