Session Information
Session Type: Poster Session B
Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM
Background/Purpose: This study aimed to characterise the main clinical features of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) sine scleroderma (ssSSc) in comparison with the limited cutaneous (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc) subsets within the international EUSTAR database.
Methods: All patients from the EUSTAR database fulfilling the ACR2013 or 1980 classification criteria for SSc assessed by the modified Rodnan Skin score (mRSS) at inclusion and with at least one follow-up visit were eligible. Sine scleroderma (ssSSc) was defined by the absence of skin thickening (mRSS=0 and no sclerodactyly) at all available visits. The clinical characteristics of these ssSSc patients were compared to those of patients with lcSSc and dcSSc with similar disease duration at last follow-up visit. Descriptive statistics were applied.
Results: Among the 4263 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 376 (8.8%) were classified as ssSSc. Among them, 40.3% had puffy fingers, 39.4% had interstitial lung disease (ILD), 1.6% had a history of scleroderma renal crisis at inclusion visit. At last available visit, in comparison with 708 lcSSc and 708 dcSSc with the same disease duration, ssSSc patients had a lower prevalence of previous or current digital ulcers (28.2% versus 53.1% in lcSSc (P< 0.001) and 68.3% in dcSSc (P< 0.001)), of joint synovitis (16.9% versus 24.3% in lcSSc (P< 0.01) and 30.8% in dcSSc (P< 0.0001)), and of elevated sPAP on echocardiogram (15.2% versus 23.9% in lcSSc (P< 0.01) and 28.7% in dcSSc (P< 0.0001)). Despite similar disease duration, disease activity at follow up visit (assessed by the EScSG disease activity index 2001 and 2016) was lower in ssSSc in comparison with lcSSc and dcSSc. By contrast, the prevalence of ILD was almost similar in ssSSc and lcSSc (49.8% and 57.1% (P=0.03)) but significantly higher in dcSSc (75.0%, P< 0.0001). Based on forced vital capacity, ILD was less severe in ssSSc in comparison with the other subsets (mean FVC 100%( pred) versus 93% in lcSSc and 82% in dcSSc (P< 0.0001 for both)). Anti-centromere antibodies were most represented in ssSSc (61.7% versus 41.9% in lcSSc (P< 0.0001) and 16.3% in dcSSc (P< 0.0001), whereas the opposite distribution was observed for anti-Scl70 antibodies. Survival was higher in ssSSc patients compared to lcSSc (P= 0.05) and dcSSc (P< 0.0001).
Conclusion: This study highlights that ssSSc patients account for almost 10% of SSc patients with milder disease severity compared to both lcSSc and dcSSc.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Lescoat A, Huang S, CARREIRA P, Siegert E, de Vries-Bouwstra J, Distler J, Smith V, Anic B, Del Galdo F, Damjanov N, Rednic S, Ribi c, Farge Bancel D, Hoffmann-vold A, Gabrielli A, Distler O, Khanna D, Allanore Y. Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Systemic Sclerosis Sine Scleroderma: Data from the International EUSTAR Database [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-characteristics-and-prognosis-of-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-sine-scleroderma-data-from-the-international-eustar-database/. Accessed .« Back to ACR Convergence 2022
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-characteristics-and-prognosis-of-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-sine-scleroderma-data-from-the-international-eustar-database/