ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1685

Efficacy and Safety of Olokizumab in a Phase III Trial of Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Inadequately Controlled by Methotrexate – Placebo and Active Controlled Study

Eugen Feist1, Saeed Fatenejad2, Sergey Grishin3, Elena Korneva3, Evgeniy Nasonov4, Anna Rowińska-Osuch5, Mikhail Samsonov6 and Roy Fleischmann7, 1Helios Department of Rheumatology, Vogelsang-Gommern, Germany, 2SFC Medica, LLC, Charlotte, NC, 3R-Pharm, Moscow, Russia, 4V.A. Nasonova Reseach Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia, 5MCM Polimedica, Warsaw, Poland, 6RPharm, Moscow, Russia, 7Metroplex Clinical Research Center and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Biologicals, olokizumab, RCT, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: RA – Treatments Poster III: RA Treatments & Their Safety (1674–1710)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Olokizumab (OKZ) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting IL-6 [1]. Here we present the results of a global phase III, head-to-head, randomized placebo (PBO) controlled clinical trial (RCT) in patients with active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (МТX) with a comparator arm of adalimumab (ADA).

Methods: This double-blind RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02760407, CREDO2) was conducted in the United States, European Union, Latin America, United Kingdom and Russia. Patients were randomized 2:2:2:1 to receive subcutaneous (SC) injections of OKZ 64 mg every 2 weeks (q2w), OKZ 64 mg once every 4 weeks (q4w), ADA 40mg q2w or PBO for 24 weeks, on background of МТX.

After week (Wk) 24, eligible patients could continue into an open-label study or enter a Safety Follow-Up Period of 20 weeks.

The primary endpoint was the percent of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 response (ACR20) at Wk 12.

Secondary endpoints at Wk 12 included the percentage of subjects achieving Disease Activity Score 28-joint count – C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) < 3.2 and improvement of physical ability from baseline to Wk 12 measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); at Wk 24, ACR50 response rate and percentage of subjects achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤2.8. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and laboratory abnormalities.

Results: A total of 1648 subjects were randomized. Baseline characteristics were comparable across treatment arms (Table 1).

Most patients completed 24 weeks of treatment: 421 (90.7%) in q2w arm, 437 (91.2%) in q4w arm, 413 (89.4%) in ADA arm and 208 (85.6%) in PBO arm and most enrolled into the open-label extension study: 410 (88.4%), 127 (89.4%), 422 (88.1%), 397 (85.9%) and 199 (81.9%) patients, respectively.

Both regimens of OKZ were statistically superior to PBO in all primary and secondary endpoints. Furthermore, non-inferiority to ADA was demonstrated for the pre-defined endpoints of ACR20 and DAS28-CRP < 3.2 for both OKZ treatment groups (Table 2).

The efficacy outcomes were maintained throughout the 24-week period of the study.

Overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 70.0% in OKZ q2w arm; 70.9% in OKZ q4w arm, 65.4% in ADA arm and 63.4% in PBO, TEAEs leading to study treatment discontinuation were reported in 4.5%, 6.3%, 5.6% and 3.7% patients, respectively. The number of deaths were comparable among arms: 3 (0.6%; 2 infections, 1 cerebrovascular accident) in the OKZ q2w arm, 2 (0.4%; 1 infection, 1 myocardial ischemia) in OKZ q4w arm, 1 (0.2%; infection) in ADA arm and 1 (0.4%; sudden death) in PBO.

The most common treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were infections (Table 3).

Conclusion: Treatment with OKZ 64 mg q2w and OKZ 64 mg q4w plus МТX was associated with significant improvements in the signs, symptoms and physical function of RA compared to PBO plus МТX and non-inferior to ADA plus МТX over a 24-week period.

OKZ was generally well tolerated and no new safety signals have been observed.

References:

Shaw S, Bourne T, et al. MAbs 2014;6(3):774-782.

Table 1. Demographic and Other Baseline Characteristics (intent-to-treat population). 1 – 100% patients were on MT; 2 – upper limit of normal 6 mg/L; TJC, tender joint count; SJC, swollen joint count

Table 2. Key efficacy results (intent-to-treat population) NRI. NRI, non-responder imputation; LSM, least squares mean; 1, non-Inferiority for each OKZ arm vs ADA is achieved if the lower limit of the 97.5% CI is greater than the protocol defined non-inferiority margin of _12%; 2, non-inferiority for each OKZ arms vs ADA is achieved if the lower limit of the 97.5% CI is greater than the protocol defined non-inferiority margin of -7.5%; **p-value difference from PBO < 0.001; ***p-value difference from PBO < 0.0001; SE, Standard Error

Table 3. Number and percentage of TESAE (Safety Population)


Disclosures: E. Feist, R-Pharm, 2, 6, Abbvie, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, AB2Bio, 6, BMS, 6, Celgene, 6, Janssen, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MSD, 6, Roche/Chugai, 2, 5, 6, Sanofi, 6, Sobi, 6, UCB, 6; S. Fatenejad, R-Pharm, 2, 4, Pfizer, 9; S. Grishin, R-Pharm, 3; E. Korneva, R-Pharm, 3; E. Nasonov, Eli Lilly, 2, Abbvie, 2, Pfizer, 2, Hoffmann-La Roche, 2, Biocad, 2, R-Pharm, 2; A. Rowińska-Osuch, R-Pharm, 5; M. Samsonov, R-Pharm, 3; R. Fleischmann, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Celltrion, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Sanofi-Aventis, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Bayer, 2, 5, Biogen, 5, Flexion, 2, 5, Galapagos, 5, Galvani, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences, 2, 5, Horizon, 5, Noven, 5, Samumed, 5, Scipher, 5, Selecta, 5, Teva Pharmaceuticals, 5, Viela, 5, Vorso, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Feist E, Fatenejad S, Grishin S, Korneva E, Nasonov E, Rowińska-Osuch A, Samsonov M, Fleischmann R. Efficacy and Safety of Olokizumab in a Phase III Trial of Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Inadequately Controlled by Methotrexate – Placebo and Active Controlled Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-olokizumab-in-a-phase-iii-trial-of-patients-with-moderately-to-severely-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-inadequately-controlled-by-methotrexate-placebo-and-active-controll/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-olokizumab-in-a-phase-iii-trial-of-patients-with-moderately-to-severely-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-inadequately-controlled-by-methotrexate-placebo-and-active-controll/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology