ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1136

Survey of Medical Cannabis Use in Lupus and Scleroderma

Wassim Karkache1 and Catherine Ivory2, 1University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Rheumatology, Ottawa, ON, CANADA, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Scleroderma, Surveys, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Therapy, alternative

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II: Miscellaneous Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Despite the lack of research regarding medical cannabis, marijuana and its by-products have gained popularity over the last decades. A 2019 Statistics Canada report revealed that approximately 16% of Canadians used marijuana in the last year. A Canadian study also revealed that 80% of rheumatologist participants were questioned by their patients weekly regarding medical marijuana; and in a similar study, 75% of participants were not comfortable prescribing medical marijuana. Despite being a common and debilitating feature in rheumatic diseases, there is little attention given to the study of medical options for the management of pain. The effects, both positive or negative of medical marijuana in patients suffering from lupus or scleroderma, is still unclear. We conducted a survey amongst patient diagnosed with lupus or scleroderma to evaluate their beliefs, concerns and personal experience if any with medical cannabis.

Methods: Patients with diagnosed lupus or scleroderma were recruited from the Ottawa Hospital division of Rheumatology. Consent was implied with completion of the survey and answers remained anonymous. Inclusion criteria: age >18, diagnosis of systemic lupus or scleroderma and able to complete survey in English or French. Data analysis of the results of the survey are qualitative.

Results: On preliminary results, 20% of participants are actively using medical cannabis, primarily in the form of CBD oil or inhaled.  In those patients taking medical cannabis, they reported no significant side effects. Of those not using cannabis, 49% of participants considered using it, and 62% would like further discussion with their rheumatologist regarding pros and cons of medical cannabis. Among our participants, the most common reasons for use of medical cannabis were insomnia, anxiety, and pain. The majority (97%) were aware that there can be side effects, and this was often the reason for wanting more information. The main elements important to the discussion was trust in their treating physician, having a non-judgemental approach, the degree of uncontrolled pain/symptoms and need for alternatives as well as receiving reliable information.

Conclusion: Our survey results suggest that a proportion of our patients have already tried medical cannabis, and most have an interest in the use of cannabis to help with symptoms not relieved by standard therapies to date. We need to be prepared to better guide our patients with respect to medical cannabis. These results will highlight common reasons/indications for medical cannabis use in this patient population. This study will ultimately assist with broadening patient perspective on medical cannabis, its impact on our patients and guide us in elaborating new strategies when discussing medical cannabis.


Disclosure: W. Karkache, None; C. Ivory, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Karkache W, Ivory C. Survey of Medical Cannabis Use in Lupus and Scleroderma [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/survey-of-medical-cannabis-use-in-lupus-and-scleroderma/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/survey-of-medical-cannabis-use-in-lupus-and-scleroderma/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology