ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0989

Withdrawal of MMF Is Safe in Quiescent Renal and Non-Renal SLE: Results from a Multi-Center Randomized Trial

Eliza Chakravarty1, Tammy Utset2, Diane Kamen3, Gabriel Contreras4, W. Joseph McCune5, Kenneth Kalunian6, Cynthia Aranow7, Megan Clowse8, Elena Massarotti9, Ellen Goldmuntz10, Jessica Springer10, Lynette Keyes-Elstein11, Bill Barry11, Ashley Pinckney11 and Judith James12, 1Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 2University of Chicago, Chicago, IN, 3Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 4University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, 5University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 6University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 7Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 8Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC, 9Brigham and Women's hospital, Boston, MA, 10NIH/NIAID, Rockville, MD, 11Rho, Durham, NC, 12Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: clinical trial, Disease Activity, Lupus nephritis, Randomized Trial, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: SLE – Treatment (0985–0989)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-3:50PM

Background/Purpose: Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) is standard of care therapy for long term treatment of lupus nephritis and other manifestations of SLE.  However, it is associated with adverse effects, pregnancy risks, increased cost, and requirement for routine laboratory monitoring. This randomized, unblinded, study compared the risk of SLE flare in subjects with quiescent disease who withdrew from long-term MMF therapy compared to those continuing maintenance MMF over 60 weeks.

Methods: Adults with quiescent SLE (clinical SLEDAI/cSLEDAI ≤4) on long term MMF therapy (≥ 2 years for nephritis; ≥ 1 year for non-nephritis) were randomized 1:1 to receive unblinded MMF at the baseline dose for 60 weeks (maintenance arm, MA) or to a 12-week structured taper off of MMF (withdrawal arm, WA).  All subjects were taking stable doses of hydroxychloroquine; prednisone ≤ 10 mg daily was permitted.  Primary endpoint was the difference between arms in the rate of clinically significant disease reactivation (CSDR) by 60 weeks. CSDR was defined as any SELENA-SLEDAI flare and increased immunosuppression (prolonged corticosteroids, resumption or increased dose of MMF, or addition of other immunosuppressives).  Rates of BILAG A and B flares, all SLEDAI flares and adverse events were assessed through 60 weeks.  Event rates and time to flare were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results: 102 participants were randomized:  50 MA and 52 WA.  One subject in each arm was ineligible and 10 subjects terminated early (7 MA, 3 WA).  84% subjects were female, with a mean of 13 years of SLE and 6.6 years of MMF therapy.  76% had a history of lupus nephritis, and mean baseline SLEDAI was 2.2. Five subjects (10%) in the MA experienced a CSDR compared to nine (18%) in the WA with a mean time to CSDR of 38 weeks (median 46 weeks) in both arms. Kaplan Meier estimate of risk difference was 0.07 (95% CI -0.07-0.21). BILAG A disease developed in one subject in the MA (pancreatitis) compared to four in the WA (cranial neuropathy, panniculitis, two renal flares).  Kaplan-Meier curves overlapped for CSDR, BILAG A flares, and all SELENA-SLEDAI flares (Figure 1).

In the participants with history of renal disease (76/100 eligible for analysis), demographics were similar to the entire cohort.  Three subjects (7.7%) met CSDR criteria in the MA compared to 8 (22%) in the WA.  Kaplan-Meier estimate of risk difference between groups was 0.14 (95% CI -0.02-0.31).  BILAG A disease occurred in one in the MA compared to four in the WA.  Mean time to CSDR was 45 weeks in the MA compared to 41 weeks in WA. BILAG A disease occurred in one in the MA compared to four in the WA.  BILAG A flares and all SELENA-SLEDAI flare Kaplan-Meier curves overlapped between arms. (Figure 2). 

Adverse events were similar between groups with Grade 2+ infections occurring more commonly in the MA (63 vs. 49).

Conclusion: In this cohort of subjects with quiescent SLE on long-term MMF therapy, few serious flares occurred in the maintenance or withdrawal groups.  Flare rates overlapped between groups, and time to flare was similar. The majority of quiescent SLE patients, including those with a history of lupus nephritis, can safely withdraw long-term MMF therapy.


Disclosure: E. Chakravarty, None; T. Utset, None; D. Kamen, None; G. Contreras, Genentech, 1, 2, Merck, 1, 2; W. McCune, None; K. Kalunian, Roche, 5, Biogen, 5, Janssen, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Lupus Research Alliance, 2, Pfizer, 2, Sanford Consortium, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, Genetech, 5, Gilead, 5, ILTOO, 5, Nektar, 5, Viela, 5, Equillium, 5, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, 5; C. Aranow, None; M. Clowse, UCB, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Astra Zeneca, 5, Pfizer, 2; E. Massarotti, Sanofi, 2; E. Goldmuntz, None; J. Springer, None; L. Keyes-Elstein, None; B. Barry, None; A. Pinckney, None; J. James, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chakravarty E, Utset T, Kamen D, Contreras G, McCune W, Kalunian K, Aranow C, Clowse M, Massarotti E, Goldmuntz E, Springer J, Keyes-Elstein L, Barry B, Pinckney A, James J. Withdrawal of MMF Is Safe in Quiescent Renal and Non-Renal SLE: Results from a Multi-Center Randomized Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/withdrawal-of-mmf-is-safe-in-quiescent-renal-and-non-renal-sle-results-from-a-multi-center-randomized-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/withdrawal-of-mmf-is-safe-in-quiescent-renal-and-non-renal-sle-results-from-a-multi-center-randomized-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology