ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0385

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Treprostinil in the Treatment of Calcinosis in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Melody Chung1, Antonia Maria Valenzuela Vergara2, Benjamin Catanese1, Shufeng Li1, Kate Stevens1 and Lorinda Chung3, 1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile, 3Stanford University School of Medicine and Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: clinical trial, Scleroderma, X-ray

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Calcinosis is characterized by calcium deposition in skin and subcutaneous tissues and progresses over one year in the majority of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. Since vascular hypoxia may contribute to calcinosis pathophysiology, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral treprostinil in preventing progression of SSc-associated calcinosis.

Methods: We performed a prospective, open-label, single-institution study in 12 SSc patients meeting 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria with confirmed radiological and physical examination evidence of >1 subcutaneous calcium deposit in the hands (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02663895). Patients received oral treprostinil for 1 year with evaluations every 3 months. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability and percentage of patients without radiographic progression of calcinosis at 1 year assessed by the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium radiographic score. Progression of calcinosis was defined as >25% increase in score, improvement as >25% decrease, and stabilization as values in-between. Radiographs were scored by a radiologist blinded to treatment history and sequence of images. Secondary endpoints included 1-year changes in the Scleroderma HAQ (SHAQ), Cochin Hand Functional Scale, SF-36, Raynaud Condition Score, and patient and physician assessment of calcinosis severity. Endpoints were assessed using Wilcoxan signed rank test.

Results: Twelve female patients were enrolled (half had diffuse cutaneous SSc disease), with mean age 55 years (range 35-68 years) (Table 1). Five patients completed the study, tolerating up to a median dosage of 1mg TID (range 0.25-7.625 mg TID). Seven patients withdrew from the trial at a median dosage of 1.3mg TID (range 0-5mg TID) at a median follow-up of 5 months (range 0.25-10 months) due to the following: intolerable side effects (n=3, diarrhea, headaches), withdrawn by investigator for intercurrent illness unrelated to drug (n=2, cirrhosis, cancer), progressive SSc (n=1), and personal reasons (n=1). Most patients developed headaches and gastrointestinal side effects, consistent with the known side effect profile of treprostinil (Table 2). No serious adverse events occurred. Four of the 12 (33%) patients experienced progression of calcinosis at 1 year. Of the 5 patients who completed 12 months of treatment, 4 had stability and 1 had progression of calcinosis (1-year median % score change: 22.2%, range: 5.3-85.5%, p=0.06). Of the 6 patients who withdrew but had 1-year follow-up radiographs, 3 had stability/improvement of calcinosis while 3 progressed (1-year median % score change: 38.4%, range: -38.9%-111%, p=0.16). Including all 12 enrolled patients, worsening of the SHAQ-VAS-GI score was observed (median change/month: 0.03, range 0-0.25, p=0.016); there were no significant changes in other secondary endpoints.

Conclusion: Oral treprostinil was poorly tolerated in SSc patients with calcinosis, with most patients developing headaches and gastrointestinal side effects. Of patients who were able to complete the treatment period, most (80%) had stability of calcinosis on hand radiographs at 1 year.

Table 1: Baseline Patient Demographics

Table 2: Adverse events with treprostinil in SSc patients (n=12)


Disclosure: M. Chung, None; A. Valenzuela Vergara, None; B. Catanese, None; S. Li, None; K. Stevens, None; L. Chung, Eicos, 1, Reata, 1, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 2, Mitsubishi Tanabe, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chung M, Valenzuela Vergara A, Catanese B, Li S, Stevens K, Chung L. A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Treprostinil in the Treatment of Calcinosis in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-pilot-study-to-evaluate-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-treprostinil-in-the-treatment-of-calcinosis-in-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-pilot-study-to-evaluate-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-treprostinil-in-the-treatment-of-calcinosis-in-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology