ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0210

Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Sarilumab over 5 Years in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Roy Fleischmann1, Karina Maslova2, Henry Leher3, Amy Praestgaard2 and Gerd Burmester4, 1Southwestern Medical Center, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 2Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, 3Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, 4Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, clinical trial, Disease Activity, Interleukins, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: RA Treatments & Their Safety

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Sarilumab is a human IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with moderate to severely active RA. In the TARGET study (NCT01709578), sarilumab significantly improved signs and symptoms of RA and physical function versus placebo in patients refractory to TNF inhibitors who were receiving background treatment with conventional synthetic DMARDs. Here we report the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) sarilumab over 5 years in patients who continued treatment in the open-label extension (OLE) study, EXTEND (NCT01146652).

Methods: Patients who received double-blind placebo, sarilumab 150 mg, or sarilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) in the 24-week randomized controlled trial TARGET were eligible to receive open-label sarilumab 200 mg q2w during EXTEND, with dose reduction to 150 mg q2w permitted to manage laboratory abnormalities or per investigator’s discretion. Safety outcomes are presented for the EXTEND population for the follow-up from TARGET baseline through EXTEND cut-off date (January 15, 2019). Efficacy assessments included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score and the proportion of responders (CDAI ≤10 and ≤2.8) over time.

Results: Of the 546 patients randomized in TARGET, 454 (83%) entered EXTEND and were treated with open-label sarilumab 200 mg (original placebo group, n=156; sarilumab 150 mg, n=145; sarilumab 200 mg, n=153). At EXTEND baseline, demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between previous treatment groups from TARGET. Overall, 81% of patients in EXTEND were women, mean age was 53 years, and mean RA duration was 12 years. At the time of data cut-off, 199 (36%) patients had discontinued treatment, of whom 100 (18%) had discontinued due to treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), 27 (5%) due to lack of efficacy, and 68 (13%) due to other reasons. Cumulative exposure to sarilumab through TARGET and EXTEND (n=521) was 1655 patient-years (PY), with 268 (51%) patients having ≥4 years’ exposure (Table 1). Overall, there were 160 TEAEs/100 PY, 10 serious AEs/100 PY, 8 AEs/100PY leading to discontinuation, and 0.3/100 PY leading to death (Table 1). The most common AEs were neutropenia (15/100 PY) and injection site erythema (12/100 PY; Table 1). Absolute neutrophil count < 1000 cells/mm3 (Grade 3–4 neutropenia) was observed in 74 (14%) patients, and normalized on treatment in 65% (48/74) of those patients. Alanine aminotransferase above 3-fold the upper limit of normal was observed in 46 patients (9%) and normalized on treatment in 54% (25/46) of those patients. Infections and serious infections occurred at rates of 58/100 PY and 4/100 PY, respectively. Clinical efficacy was sustained through 5 years of EXTEND (Table 2). At EXTEND Week 240 (n=95), mean ± SD change in CDAI score from TARGET baseline was −31 ± 15.

Conclusion: The safety profile of sarilumab was consistent with results of phase 3 trials, IL-6R inhibition, and SC administration, and no new safety signals were identified over 5 years of follow-up in patients with RA refractory to TNF inhibitors. Clinical efficacy was sustained through 5 years’ follow-up.

Table 1

Table 2


Disclosure: R. Fleischmann, Pfizer, 2, 5; K. Maslova, Sanofi, 1, 3; H. Leher, Regeneron, 3, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, 3, 4; A. Praestgaard, Sanofi, 3; G. Burmester, AbbVie, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, Celgene, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fleischmann R, Maslova K, Leher H, Praestgaard A, Burmester G. Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Sarilumab over 5 Years in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-safety-and-efficacy-of-sarilumab-over-5-years-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-refractory-to-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/long-term-safety-and-efficacy-of-sarilumab-over-5-years-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-refractory-to-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology