ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2755

Assessing the Sensitivity to Change of the OMERACT Ultrasound Structural Gout Lesions During Urate-Lowering Therapy

Sara Nysom Christiansen1, Mikkel Østergaard 2, Ole Slot 1, George A. W. Bruyn 3, Helen Keen 4, Maria-Antonietta D’Agostino 5 and Lene Terslev 6, 1Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark, 2Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3Department of Rheumatology, MC Groep Hospitals., Lelystad, Netherlands, 4School of Medicine and Pharmacology Fiona Stanley Hospital Unit, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 5Department of Rheumatology, Ambroise Pare´ Hospital, and Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 6Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout, ultrasound and Sodium Urate Crystals

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: 5T089: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases II (2750–2755)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: To evaluate the sensitivity to change of ultrasound (US) structural gout lesions, as defined by the OMERACT US group, in gout patients during urate lowering therapy.

Methods: US examination (28 joints, 26 tendons) was performed in patients with microscopically verified gout, who initiated or increased urate lowering therapy. Joints and tendons were evaluated by US for the OMERACT structural gout lesions (double contour sign (DC), tophus, aggregates and erosions), scored binarily (0/1). Synovial changes were graded by grey scale (GS) and color Doppler (CD), both scored semiquantitatively (0-3), where a score > 1 was considered pathological. A sum score was calculated for each lesion for each patient. Numbers of gout attacks within the last 4 and 12 weeks and Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) regarding pain (visual analogue scale (VAS)) and physical function (HAQ) were obtained, as were CRP, p-urate and clinical joint examination. All examinations were repeated after 3 and 6 months. Changes in patient’s sum scores and lesion scores at different locations (joints and tendons) were evaluated using Wilcoxon-Pratt signed-rank test. Furthermore, changes in lesion scores between groups that did/did not achieve the treatment target (p-urate < 0.36 mmol/L) were compared using Mann Whitney U test and Chi square test.

Results: 50 patients (48 males, 2 females), mean age of 68.9 years (range 30-88) were included. US showed a statistically significant decrease in DC and tophus sum scores from both 0-3 and 3-6 months (table 1). The aggregate sum score only showed a statistically significant decrease from 3-6 months, whereas the erosion sum score was almost unchanged in the follow-up period. GS and CD synovitis sum scores both showed statistically significant decreases at 6 months’ follow up, and for CD also from 0-3 months (table 1).

Structural lesions were most commonly found in metatarsophalangeal 1-4 and knee joints, which were also the locations with the most pronounced changes in scores (figure 1).

Tender and swollen joint counts, PROs and number of joint attacks declined statistically significantly from 0-3 months, except for the HAQ, which only declined numerically. P-urate levels decreased statistically significantly from both 0-3 months and 3-6 months (table 1).

No statistically significant differences in US sum score changes during follow up were observed between groups that did/did not obtain the treatment goal.

Conclusion: Of the four US structural gout lesions, DC and tophus showed sensitivity to change after only 3 months of urate lowering therapy, using a binary score, whereas aggregates only showed a change after 6 months follow-up.

This study indicates that US assessment of the OMERACT structural gout lesions, particularly DC and tophus, seems to be a useful tool for monitoring improvement over time. Future studies should investigate whether more sensitive monitoring may be obtained by using a semiquantitative scoring system.


Disclosure: S. Christiansen, None; M. Østergaard, AbbVie, 2, 8, 9, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB, 5, 8, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and UCB, 5, 8, Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, and Novartis, 2, Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, Novartis, 2, BMS, 2, 5, 8, 9, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 8, Boehringer-ingelheim, 9, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Centocor, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, 9, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Eli-Lilly, 2, 8, Hospira, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, 9, Merck, 2, 5, 8, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Novo, 2, 5, 8, Novo Nordisk, 5, 8, Orion, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, 9, Regeneron, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, roche, 9, Sandoz, 2, 8, Sanofi, 2, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; O. Slot, None; G. Bruyn, None; H. Keen, None; M. D’Agostino, None; L. Terslev, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Christiansen S, Østergaard M, Slot O, Bruyn G, Keen H, D’Agostino M, Terslev L. Assessing the Sensitivity to Change of the OMERACT Ultrasound Structural Gout Lesions During Urate-Lowering Therapy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-the-sensitivity-to-change-of-the-omeract-ultrasound-structural-gout-lesions-during-urate-lowering-therapy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-the-sensitivity-to-change-of-the-omeract-ultrasound-structural-gout-lesions-during-urate-lowering-therapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology