ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2572

Efficacy Analysis of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treated with Belimumab or Placebo Plus Standard Therapy in Phase 3 Trials by Baseline Levels of BLyS mRNA and Type 1 Interferon Inducible Gene Signature Status

Angela R Jones-Leone1, Shaun Flint 2, Roger Abramino Levy 3, David Roth 4, Robert Henderson 2, Christel Wilkinson 2, Beulah Ji 5 and Damon L Bass 3, 1GlaxoSmithKline, Upper Providence, 2GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, United Kingdom, 3GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, 4GSK, Collegeville, PA, 5GSK, Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: belimumab, BLyS, Interferons and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), messenger RNA (mRNA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Belimumab (BEL) is a B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) inhibitor approved as an add-on to standard of care (SoC) for patients with autoantibody-positive SLE with active disease. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the efficacy of BEL vs placebo (PBO) plus SoC when participants were stratified by whole blood BLyS mRNA levels and by type 1 interferon-inducible gene signature (IFN-1) status at study baseline.

Methods: This study (GSK study 208651) is a post hoc analysis of two Phase 3 trials (BLISS-76 [BEL110751] and -52 [BEL110752]) in which patients received intravenous BEL 10 mg/kg plus SoC or PBO plus SoC. The population for the analysis included all randomized patients with an mRNA sample that passed quality control who received at least one dose of BEL or PBO. Co‑primary endpoints were SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 response within each subgroup and the correlation between baseline BLyS mRNA and IFN-1 levels overall. For binary endpoints, a logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds of SRI response for BEL vs PBO within BLyS mRNA subgroups (high/medium/low tertiles according to quantitative PCR mRNA delta cycle threshold), IFN-1 (high/low) subgroups (according to the median mRNA level of IFI27, IFI44, IFI44L, and RSAD2, defined with reference to samples from 25 healthy volunteers and the trough in bimodal distribution) and overall. To assess SRI-4 response, patients were required to have a Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index score ≥4 at baseline. The correlation between BLyS gene expression and IFN-1 was analyzed by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and further by Chi Square test to compare subgroups.

Results: This analysis was based on N=281 (BEL) and N=273 (PBO). Baseline demographics were similar across the BLyS and IFN subgroups. There were more SRI-4 responders at Week 52 for BEL vs PBO in all three BLyS mRNA subgroups but the odds ratio (OR) only achieved statistical significance for the BLyS medium subgroup (Table 1). Baseline BLyS gene expression and IFN-1 were significantly correlated (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient 0.7799; 95% CI: 0.7451, 0.8106; p< 0.0001). The percentage of responders at Week 52 was greater for BEL vs PBO for both the low and high IFN-1 subgroups and the OR achieved statistical significance in the high IFN subgroup (Table 2).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated a tendency toward better response to BEL as add-on therapy vs SoC alone in patients who had higher baseline BLyS mRNA and IFN-1. However, this was an exploratory analysis, the sample size was opportunistic, with the consequence that the BLyS and IFN-1 subgroups were not explicitly powered to detect a difference in response rates. More studies are necessary to understand whether these biomarkers should be used as treatment decision tools.

Study funding: GSK. Medical writing support: Jennie McLean, PhD, Fishawack Indicia Ltd, UK (funded by GSK).

†Covariates include treatment group, study, baseline SELENA-SLEDAI score -≤9 vs ≥10-, baseline proteinuria
–<2 g/24 hours vs ≥2 g/24 hour equivalent- and race -African descent or indigenous American descent vs other- BLyS, B-lymphocyte stimulator; BEL, belimumab; CI, confidence interval; PBO, placebo; SELENA-SLEDAI; Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment – Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index; SRI-4, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index

†Covariates include treatment group, study, baseline SELENA-SLEDAI score -≤9 vs ≥10-, baseline proteinuria
–<2 g/24 hour vs ≥2 g/24 hour equivalent- and race -African descent or indigenous American descent vs other- BEL, belimumab; CI, confidence interval; IFN-1, type 1 interferon-inducible gene signature; PBO, placebo; SELENA-SLEDAI; Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment – Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index; SRI-4, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index


Disclosure: A. Jones-Leone, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 3; S. Flint, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 3; R. Levy, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 3, 4; D. Roth, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 3, 4; R. Henderson, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 3; C. Wilkinson, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 5; B. Ji, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 3, 4; D. Bass, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 3, 4.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jones-Leone A, Flint S, Levy R, Roth D, Henderson R, Wilkinson C, Ji B, Bass D. Efficacy Analysis of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treated with Belimumab or Placebo Plus Standard Therapy in Phase 3 Trials by Baseline Levels of BLyS mRNA and Type 1 Interferon Inducible Gene Signature Status [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-analysis-of-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-treated-with-belimumab-or-placebo-plus-standard-therapy-in-phase-3-trials-by-baseline-levels-of-blys-mrna-and-type-1-interferon-inducibl/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-analysis-of-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-treated-with-belimumab-or-placebo-plus-standard-therapy-in-phase-3-trials-by-baseline-levels-of-blys-mrna-and-type-1-interferon-inducibl/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology