ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2571

Early Improvement in SLEDAI-2K Responder Index-50 Predicts SRI-4 Response in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ustekinumab (UST) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Zahi Touma1, Dafna Gladman 2, Shawn Rose 3, Kaiyin Fei 3, Yun Gregan 3, Robert Gordon 3, Kim Hung Lo 3 and Murray Urowitz 1, 1University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: While traditional Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scoring assesses complete SLE response for individual disease manifestations, the SLEDAI-2K Responder Index-50 (S2K RI-50) evaluates responses using partial improvement (≥50%) in each of the 9 organ systems of SLEDAI-2K. Ustekinumab (UST), a monoclonal antibody that targets the shared p40 subunit of the cytokines IL-12 & IL-23, is being investigated in patients with active SLE. We have previously shown in a Phase 2 placebo (PBO)-controlled trial of UST in SLE1 that not only SLEDAI-2K and the SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4), but also S2K RI-50 can discriminate a treatment effect of UST vs PBO at week 24.2,3 Here, we aimed to ascertain whether a minimal threshold of partial improvement in S2K RI-50 could be used as an early predictor of SRI-4 response. 

Methods: This phase 2, PBO-controlled study enrolled adults with seropositive, active disease (SLEDAI score ≥6 with ≥1 BILAG A &/or ≥2 BILAG B scores) despite standard therapy. Patients (n=102) were randomized (3:2) to receive UST IV ~6 mg/kg or PBO at week 0, followed by SC injections of UST 90mg or PBO q8w beginning at week8, both added to standard of care. We calculated S2K RI-50 response through week 24 in all patients, including 60 patients receiving UST and 42 patients receiving PBO, using increasing cut-offs of S2K RI-50 reductions from baseline. To help determining a minimal cut-off that discriminated a treatment effect reflecting partial improvement, nominal p values are reported for this post hoc analysis. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between reduction in S2K RI-50 at week 12 or week 16 and SRI-4 response at week 24, followed by correlation of binary response data between the two instruments.

Results: A 2-point reduction from baseline (improvement) in S2K RI-50 appeared to be the lowest threshold of response to demonstrate a treatment difference in the proportion of responders at week 24 with UST (93.5%) vs PBO (79.3%) (∆14.2%, p=0.03). The relationship between 2-point improvement in S2K RI-50 at week 12 or week 16 and SRI-4 response at week 24 is presented in the total study population and by treatment group (Table). In the total population, 78/102 (76.6%) patients at week 12 and 74/102 (72.5%) patients at week 16 had at least a 2-point improvement in S2K RI-50. Of those, 47/78 (60.3%, r=0.62) at week 12 and 48/74 (64.9%, r=0.76) at week 16 achieved an SRI-4 response at week 24. Odds ratios for the association between SRI-4 response at week 24 and 2-point or greater improvement in S2K RI-50 were 7.6 (CI 2.4-24.3, p=0.0007) at week 12 and 15.4 (CI 4.2-55.8, p< 0.0001) at week 16. Similar analyses performed by treatment group demonstrated that these relationships were consistent in the UST and PBO groups (Table).

Conclusion: S2K RI-50 captures partial improvement of ≥50% in SLE disease activity and could be a useful outcome in clinical trials to predict early clinical response. These findings will be confirmed in an ongoing Phase 3 study.

References

  1. van Vollenhoven et al. Lancet. 2018:392:1330.
  2. Touma Z et al. EULAR June 2018, Amsterdam, NL.
  3. Touma Z et al. APLAR. April 2019, Brisbane, Australia.


Disclosure: Z. Touma, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 2; D. Gladman, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, BMS, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Galapagos, 5, Galapagos NV, 5, Gilead, 5, GSI, 5, Janssen, 5, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; S. Rose, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; K. Fei, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; Y. Gregan, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; R. Gordon, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; K. Lo, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; M. Urowitz, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, UCB Pharma, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Touma Z, Gladman D, Rose S, Fei K, Gregan Y, Gordon R, Lo K, Urowitz M. Early Improvement in SLEDAI-2K Responder Index-50 Predicts SRI-4 Response in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ustekinumab (UST) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-improvement-in-sledai-2k-responder-index-50-predicts-sri-4-response-in-a-randomized-placebo-controlled-trial-of-ustekinumab-ust-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/early-improvement-in-sledai-2k-responder-index-50-predicts-sri-4-response-in-a-randomized-placebo-controlled-trial-of-ustekinumab-ust-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology