ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 669

Complement Activation in Probable Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (pSLE) May Predict Progression to SLE Defined by Fulfillment of ACR Classification Criteria

Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman1, Roberta Alexander 2, Sonali Narain 3, Cristina Arriens 4, Elena Massarotti 5, Daniel Wallace 6, Amit Saxena 7, Christopher Collins 8, Chaim Putterman 9, Kenneth Kalunian 10, Tyler O'Malley 11, Armida Sace 2, Rowena LaFon 2, Jo-Anne Ligayon 2, Claudia Ibarra 2, John Conklin 2, Thierry Dervieux 2 and Arthur Weinstein 12, 1Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 2Exagen, Vista, CA, 3Northwell Health, Great Neck, Long Island, NY, 4Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 5Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 6Cedars Sinai Medical Center/UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 7New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 8MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Department of Rheumatology, Washington, DC, 9Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 11Exagen, Oceanside, CA, 12Georgetown University & Exagen, Inc, Claremont, CA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: complement, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and diagnosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster I: Epidemiology & Pathogenesis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: We reported (Ramsey-Goldman et al., Arthritis Rheumatol 2018: 70 [suppl 10]) that cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) and a multi-analyte assay panel with algorithm (MAP) are positive more frequently than standard immunological markers in patients with probable systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) who fulfilled 3 ACR criteria. We followed pSLE prospectively to evaluate whether CB-CAPs and MAP positivity at enrollment predict transition to classifiable SLE by fulfillment of a fourth ACR criterion.

Methods: pSLE were followed prospectively at academic lupus centers and clinical and laboratory data were collected. Biomarkers were measured at every visit. CB-CAPs – C4d bound to erythrocytes (EC4d) and B-cells (BC4d) – were measured by quantitative flow cytometry and expressed as mean fluorescent intensity (MFI). Serum C3 and C4 and autoantibodies were measured by turbidimetry and ELISA, respectively. Anti-dsDNA positivity was confirmed by immunofluorescence (IFA) with Crithidia Luciliae. MAP was evaluated as previously described (Dervieux T, et al. J Immunol Methods 2017) and consists of an algorithm which utilizes CB-CAPs and autoantibodies. A MAP score >0.1 is considered positive, the higher the number (to 3.5) the greater the likelihood of SLE. For this study, decision analysis with Youden index showed that MAP >0.8 and EC4d >20 MFI reflected the optimal cutoff. Data were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test and Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model for time to fulfillment of a fourth ACR criterion, expressed as hazard ratios.

Results: Of the 92 pSLE enrolled, 69 had 1 follow up visit 9-18 months after enrollment (average±SD = 12.4±1.7 months; median = 12 months). The time to acquire the 4th ACR criterion was estimated by the investigators at the follow up visit. Twenty pSLE (29%) fulfilled a fourth ACR criterion during this time. SLICC fulfillment at enrollment did not predict fulfillment of ACR criteria (p =0.27). Eight of the 20 (40%) pSLE who transitioned to classifiable SLE by ACR criteria had MAP >0.8 at enrollment while 8/48 (17%) non-transitioned patients had MAP > 0.8 at enrollment (p =0.06). Patients with MAP >0.8 at enrollment fulfilled ACR criteria with a hazard ratio (HR) =3.11 within 18 months (p < 0.01 by log-rank test). HR of MAP was higher than other individual biomarkers, although anti-dsDNA and EC4d >20 MFI were of borderline significance (Table).

Conclusion: Complement activation as detected by MAP >0.8 at enrollment may predict disease evolution of pSLE into classifiable SLE by ACR criteria better than anti-dsDNA and low serum complement.


table

Hazard ratio -HR- of biomarkers in predicting fulfillment of a fourth ACR classification criterion by 18 months in the pSLE population.
Data of 69 follow-up visits -n = 68 for MAP- that occurred 9 to 18 months after enrollment were analyzed. CB-CAPs: cell-bound complement activation products; MAP: multianalyte assay panel with algorithm; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence intervals.


Disclosure: R. Ramsey-Goldman, Exagen, 2; R. Alexander, Exagen, 3; S. Narain, Exagen, 2; C. Arriens, AstraZeneca, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Exagen, 2, GSK, 2, 5; E. Massarotti, Exagen, 2; D. Wallace, Exagen, 2; A. Saxena, Exagen, 2; C. Collins, Exagen, 2, 5; C. Putterman, Equillium, 5, Equillium, Inc, 2, 5, Exagen, 2; K. Kalunian, AbbVie, 9, Abbvie, 5, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Biogen, 5, 9, BMS, 2, 9, Chemocentryx, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, 9, Equillium, 5, Exagen, 2, Genentech/Roche, 5, Gilead, 9, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 9, GSK, 5, Idosia, 2, Janssen, 5, Kirin, 2, MedImmune, 5, Nektar, 5, Pfizer, 2, Resolve, 2, Roche, 9, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2; T. O'Malley, Exagen, 3; A. Sace, Exagen, 3; R. LaFon, Exagen, 3; J. Ligayon, Exagen, 3; C. Ibarra, Exagen, 1, 3, 4; J. Conklin, Exagen, 3; T. Dervieux, Exagen, 1, 3, 4, 6; A. Weinstein, Exagen, 4, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ramsey-Goldman R, Alexander R, Narain S, Arriens C, Massarotti E, Wallace D, Saxena A, Collins C, Putterman C, Kalunian K, O'Malley T, Sace A, LaFon R, Ligayon J, Ibarra C, Conklin J, Dervieux T, Weinstein A. Complement Activation in Probable Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (pSLE) May Predict Progression to SLE Defined by Fulfillment of ACR Classification Criteria [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/complement-activation-in-probable-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-psle-may-predict-progression-to-sle-defined-by-fulfillment-of-acr-classification-criteria/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/complement-activation-in-probable-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-psle-may-predict-progression-to-sle-defined-by-fulfillment-of-acr-classification-criteria/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology