ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 491

Diagnostic Performance of Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP) 2 and CCP3.1 Assays in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Daniela Sieghart1, Christian Konrad 2, Sascha Swiniarski 2, Helmuth Haslacher 3, Daniel Aletaha 4 and Günter Steiner 1, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria, Vienna, Austria, 2Thermo Fisher Scientific, Freiburg, Germany, Freiburg, Germany, 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Vienna, Austria, 4Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-CCP antibodies, diagnostic performance and early RA, Enzyme-Linked Immunoabsorbant Assays (ELISA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Risk Factors, Predictors, & Prognosis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies are the most specific markers for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Different generations of assays (CCP1-CCP3) have been developed which show variability regarding their performance. This may have considerable impact on diagnostic decision making because serological testing is an important diagnostic tool especially in the early stages of disease. Therefore the comparability of different assays is an important issue to address.

Methods: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of IgG and IgA anti-CCP2 detected by EliATM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) compared to the combined IgG/IgA Quanta LiteR anti-CCP3.1 assay (Inova Diagnostics) in sera of 184 early RA patients, 98 healthy subjects and 360 disease controls.

Results: Anti-CCP2 IgG and IgA assays were found having very high specificities versus healthy subjects (98.9%; 98%) as well as disease controls (98.8%; 99.4%). Sensitivities were 52.2% for anti-CCP2-IgG and 30.4% for anti-CCP2 IgA, respectively. This resulted in high positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of 47.5 for the IgG and 50.7 for the IgA assay. However, anti-CCP2 IgA antibodies did not show an added diagnostic value since all positive patients were also anti-CCP IgG positive. The anti-CCP3.1 assay was found to be slightly more sensitive than the anti-CCP2 IgG assay with 55.4% of early RA patients being positive. However, specificity was markedly lower and amounted to 95.9% versus healthy subjects and 90.8% versus disease controls which resulted in a relatively low LR+ of only 6.0. The data are summarized in Table 1. When adjusting the cut-off value of the CCP3.1 assay to >98% specificity against disease controls, sensitivity (52.7%) became comparable to the anti-CCP2 assay and LR+ increased to 26.4 which was still somewhat lower than the LR+ of the CCP2 assays.

Conclusion: Thus, when interpreting the results of diagnostic assays the issue of test to test variability must be taken into account as reduced specificity might lead to an increase in false positive diagnosis.


Table 1 ACR Abstract

Table 1 Specificity, sensitivity and positive likelihood ratio -LR+- of CCP2 -IgG, IgA- and CCP3.1 assays.


Disclosure: D. Sieghart, None; C. Konrad, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 3; S. Swiniarski, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 3; H. Haslacher, None; D. Aletaha, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, 5, AbbVie, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Roche., 2, Amgen, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and UCB, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, 8, Medac, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Merck Sharp and Dohme, 2, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8, Sanofi/Genzyme, 5, 8, UCB, 8; G. Steiner, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sieghart D, Konrad C, Swiniarski S, Haslacher H, Aletaha D, Steiner G. Diagnostic Performance of Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP) 2 and CCP3.1 Assays in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diagnostic-performance-of-anti-cyclic-citrullinated-peptide-ccp-2-and-ccp3-1-assays-in-early-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diagnostic-performance-of-anti-cyclic-citrullinated-peptide-ccp-2-and-ccp3-1-assays-in-early-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology