ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 483

Can a Single Question on Functional Impairments Facilitate the Diagnosis of Early Inflammatory Arthritis? A Cross-Sectional Derivation and Validation Study in Two Early Arthritis Recognition Clinics

Bastiaan van Dijk1, Hanna van Steenbergen 1, Ellis Niemantsverdriet 1 and Annette van der Helm-van Mil 2, 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2LUMC, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Diagnostic Tests, inflammatory arthritis, multicenter study and primary care, physical impairment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Risk Factors, Predictors, & Prognosis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Early treatment initiation in RA is associated with improved outcomes but requires early identification of synovitis. Joint swelling in early inflammatory arthritis (IA) may be subtle, making it difficult to detect at joint palpation, especially for general practitioners (GPs) who have limited experience with this. To promote early recognition of IA, two Early Arthritis Recognition Clinics (EARC) were initiated in our country. EARCs are easy-access outpatient rheumatology clinics, intermediary between primary and secondary care, to which GPs can refer patients if in doubt about the presence of IA (instead of ‘watchful waiting’). Although this approach markedly reduced referral delay, it may not be easily implemented in other places. New tools are needed. Since it is unknown if inquiring about functional impairments is helpful in the early detection of IA, we used the unique EARC data of patients with suspected IA to investigate this. Aiming for simple and time-efficient use in daily practice, we evaluated whether a single question on functional impairments could aid the diagnosis of early IA.

Methods: From September 2010 to April 2014, 997 patients with suspected but uncertain IA visited one of the two EARCs and were included in a derivation cohort. In addition, 557 other patients visiting the same EARC (November 2015-December 2018) and 506 patients visiting another EARC (September 2010-January 2014) served as validation cohorts. IA was assessed by joint examination by rheumatologists, physical functioning with the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Discriminative abilities of its 20 questions for IA were compared based on the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and test characteristics. Associations between the best discriminating question and IA were assessed with logistic regression. Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age, sex and for six other, previously reported variables predictive of the presence of IA. Overall discriminative ability of multivariable logistic regression models was assessed with the AUC.

Results: IA was diagnosed in 43%, 35% and 53% of patients in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. In the derivation cohort, patients with IA had higher mean HAQ-DI-scores (0.84 compared to 0.73, p=0.003). Discriminative characteristics of one question on difficulties with dressing (AUC (95%CI) 0.57 (0.54–0.61); OR 1.83 (1.41-2.38)) paralleled the total HAQ-DI score (AUC 0.55 (0.52–0.59)). In the validation cohorts, ORs were 2.14 (1.48-3.10) and 2.00 (1.39-2.87) in univariable analyses, which remained similar in multivariable analyses. However, the difference in AUC for multivariable models with and without ‘difficulties with dressing’ was small: 0.73 (0.70–0.77) and 0.72 (0.69–0.76), respectively. Test characteristics are shown in the table.

Conclusion: A yes/no answer on a simple question (“Are you able to dress yourself, including shoelaces and buttons?”) was helpful in discriminating patients with and without IA. Findings were validated in independent 1.5-line settings and need to be validated further in primary care. This is a step forward to arrive at practical tools that are helpful for GPs in diagnosing IA.

Table. Test characteristics of the presence of difficulties with dressing -scores ≥1 on the corresponding HAQ-DI question-, with IA at physical examination as outcome.


Disclosure: B. van Dijk, None; H. van Steenbergen, None; E. Niemantsverdriet, None; A. van der Helm-van Mil, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

van Dijk B, van Steenbergen H, Niemantsverdriet E, van der Helm-van Mil A. Can a Single Question on Functional Impairments Facilitate the Diagnosis of Early Inflammatory Arthritis? A Cross-Sectional Derivation and Validation Study in Two Early Arthritis Recognition Clinics [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-a-single-question-on-functional-impairments-facilitate-the-diagnosis-of-early-inflammatory-arthritis-a-cross-sectional-derivation-and-validation-study-in-two-early-arthritis-recognition-clinics/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-a-single-question-on-functional-impairments-facilitate-the-diagnosis-of-early-inflammatory-arthritis-a-cross-sectional-derivation-and-validation-study-in-two-early-arthritis-recognition-clinics/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology