Session Information
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018
Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatments Poster III: Biosimilars and New Compounds
Session Type: ACR Poster Session C
Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM
Background/Purpose:
Sarilumab showed efficacy in RA and superiority to placebo and adalimumab in Phase 3 trials. This post hoc analysis investigated LFT levels in three sarilumab Phase 3 trials.
Methods:
The adalimumab-controlled MONARCH (NCT02332590) and placebo-controlled TARGET (NCT01709578) and MOBILITY (NCT01061736) studies allowed alanine- (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels ≤1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN) at entry. Patients who received ≥1 dose of sarilumab and had ≥1 post-baseline measurement of ALT or AST were categorized by baseline and maximum on-study ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase (AP).
Results:
In MOBILITY (MTX-IR), among patients with normal ALT at baseline (n=1085), maximum on-study ALT >3x ULN was seen in 8.0% (n=29) and 7.8% (n=28) of patients in sarilumab 150 and 200 mg + MTX groups, respectively, versus 2.2% (n=8) with placebo + MTX (Table 1). Among patients with ALT >ULN at baseline (n=106), maximum on-study ALT >3x ULN was seen in 23% (n=9) and 16% (n=6) in sarilumab 150 and 200 mg + MTX groups, respectively, versus 3.6% (n=1) with placebo + MTX. In the monotherapy MONARCH study, the proportion of patients with maximum on-study ALT >3x ULN was 2.4% (n=4) in patients with normal baseline ALT and 15% (n=2) in patients with baseline ALT >ULN in the sarilumab group, and 1.7% (n=3) and 20% (n=2), respectively, in the adalimumab group (Table 2). ALT elevations in TARGET (TNF-IR; Table 3) were less frequent compared with MOBILITY. There were no cases of Hy’s Law attributable to sarilumab treatment. Laboratory investigations (including LFT elevations) led to treatment discontinuation in 0.2–0.6% of placebo- and 0.5–2.8% of sarilumab-treated patients.
Conclusion:
LFT elevations with sarilumab, an IL-6R blocker recently approved for the treatment of RA, were more likely in combination with csDMARDs than with monotherapy, and more likely in patients with baseline elevations. Incidence of ALT >3x ULN was similar between monotherapy sarilumab and adalimumab. Importantly, LFT elevations rarely necessitated treatment discontinuation
Acknowledgements
Study funding and medical writing support (Matt Lewis, Adelphi Communications) provided by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Table 1. Maximum on-treatment LFTs in 52-week MOBILITY study of sarilumab+csDMARDs in patients with RA and inadequate response to MTX (MTX-IR) |
||||||
|
Placebo (N=397) |
Sarilumab 150 mg (N=401) |
Sarilumab 200 mg (N=396) |
|||
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
Baseline |
|||
ALT |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
|
n=367 (92%)a |
n=28 (7.1%)a |
n=361 (90%)a |
n=40 (10%)a |
n=357 (90%)a |
n=38 (9.6%)a |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
|
|
||
LLN–ULN |
251 (68) |
3 (11) |
177 (49) |
4 (10) |
147 (41) |
4 (11) |
>ULN–3x ULN |
108 (29) |
24 (86) |
155 (43) |
27 (68) |
182 (51) |
28 (74) |
>3x ULN–5x ULN |
7 (1.9) |
1 (3.6) |
19 (5.3) |
6 (15) |
20 (5.6) |
4 (11) |
>5x ULN |
1 (0.3) |
– |
10 (2.8) |
3 (7.5) |
8 (2.2) |
2 (5.3) |
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
Baseline |
|||
AST |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
|
n=381 (96%)a |
n=14 (3.5%)a |
n=374 (93%)a |
n=26 (6.5%)a |
n=374 (94%)a |
n=20 (5.1%)a |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
|
|
||
LLN–ULN |
307 (81) |
4 (29) |
216 (58) |
4 (15) |
209 (56) |
8 (40) |
>ULN–3x ULN |
71 (19) |
10 (71) |
145 (39) |
18 (69) |
157 (42) |
10 (50) |
>3x ULN–5x ULN |
3 (0.8) |
– |
7 (1.9) |
3 (12) |
6 (1.6) |
1 (5.0) |
>5x ULN |
– |
– |
6 (1.6) |
1 (3.8) |
2 (0.5) |
1 (5.0) |
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
Baseline |
|||
Total bilirubin |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
|
n=370 (93%)a |
n=0 |
n=370 (92%)a |
n=2 (0.5%)a |
n=370 (93%)a |
n=1 (0.3%)a |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
|
|
||
LLN–ULN |
361 (98) |
– |
342 (92) |
– |
335 (91) |
– |
>ULN–1.5x ULN |
9 (2.4) |
– |
17 (4.6) |
– |
23 (6.2) |
1 (100) |
>1.5x ULN–2x ULN |
– |
– |
8 (2.2) |
2 (100) |
9 (2.4) |
– |
>2x ULN |
– |
– |
3 (0.8) |
– |
3 (0.8) |
– |
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
Baseline |
|||
AP |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
|
n=359 (90%)a |
n=38 (9.6%)a |
n=366 (91%)a |
n=34 (8.5%)a |
n=350 (88%)a |
n=45 (11%)a |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
|
|
||
<LLN |
– |
– |
– |
– |
1 (0.3) |
– |
LLN–ULN |
321 (89) |
– |
338 (92) |
12 (35) |
326 (93) |
21 (47) |
>ULN–1.5x ULN |
36 (10) |
29 (76) |
22 (6.0) |
14 (41) |
19 (5.4) |
19 (42) |
>1.5x ULN |
2 (0.6) |
9 (24) |
6 (1.6) |
8 (24) |
4 (1.1) |
5 (11) |
Patients with baseline value <LLN (all LFTs) or missing (total bilirubin or AP) are not shown; apercentage of treatment group; bpercentage of baseline category within treatment group. LLN, lower limit of normal |
Table 2. Maximum on-treatment LFTs in 24-week MONARCH study of sarilumab monotherapy in patients with active RA |
||||
|
Adalimumab 40 mg q2w (N=184) |
Sarilumab 200 mg q2w (N=184) |
||
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
||
ALT |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
|
n=174 (95%)a |
n=10 (5.4%)a |
n=169 (92%)a |
n=13 (7.1%)a |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
||
LLN–ULN |
137 (79) |
2 (20) |
112 (66) |
2 (15) |
>ULN–3x ULN |
33 (19) |
6 (60) |
53 (31) |
9 (69) |
>3x ULN–5x ULN |
3 (1.7) |
– |
3 (1.8) |
2 (15) |
>5x ULN |
– |
2 (20) |
1 (0.6) |
– |
Missing |
1 (0.6) |
– |
– |
– |
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
||
AST |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
|
n=176 (96%)a |
n=8 (4.3%)a |
n=175 (95%)a |
n=7 (3.8%)a |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
||
LLN–ULN |
153 (87) |
3 (38) |
144 (82) |
1 (14) |
>ULN–3x ULN |
19 (11) |
4 (50) |
29 (17) |
6 (86) |
>3x ULN–5x ULN |
3 (1.7) |
– |
2 (1.1) |
– |
>5x ULN |
– |
1 (13) |
– |
– |
Missing |
1 (0.6) |
– |
– |
– |
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
||
Total bilirubin |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
|
n=170 (92%)a |
n=1 (0.5)a |
n=164 (89%)a |
n=1 (0.5%)a |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
||
LLN–ULN |
165 (97) |
– |
150 (91) |
1 (100) |
>ULN–1.5x ULN |
4 (2.4) |
– |
7 (4.3) |
– |
>1.5x ULN–2x ULN |
– |
1 (100) |
5 (3.0) |
– |
>2x ULN |
– |
– |
2 (1.2) |
– |
Missing |
1 (0.6) |
– |
– |
– |
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
||
AP |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
|
n=168 (91%)a |
n=15 (8.2%)a |
n=170 (92%)a |
n=14 (7.6%)a |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
||
<LLN |
1 (0.6) |
– |
1 (0.6) |
– |
LLN–ULN |
149 (89) |
3 (20) |
158 (93) |
7 (50) |
>ULN–1.5x ULN |
14 (8.3) |
9 (60) |
9 (5.3) |
7 (50) |
>1.5x ULN |
3 (1.8) |
3 (20) |
2 (1.2) |
– |
Missing |
1 (0.6) |
– |
– |
– |
Patients with baseline value <LLN (all LFTs) or missing (total bilirubin or AP) are not shown; apercentage of treatment group; bpercentage of baseline category within treatment group. LLN, lower limit of normal |
Table 3. Maximum on-treatment LFTs in 24-week TARGET study of sarilumab+csDMARDs in patients with RA and inadequate response or intolerance to >1 TNF inhibitor |
||||||
|
Placebo (N=181) |
Sarilumab 150 mg (N=181) |
Sarilumab 200 mg (N=184) |
|||
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
Baseline |
|||
ALT |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
|
n=164 (91%)a |
n=17 (9.4%)a |
n=163 (90%)a |
n=18 (10%)a |
n=176 (96%)a |
n=7 (3.8%)a |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
|
|
||
LLN–ULN |
129 (79) |
4 (24) |
98 (60) |
2 (11) |
92 (52) |
1 (14) |
>ULN–3x ULN |
34 (21) |
12 (71) |
61 (37) |
15 (83) |
75 (43) |
5 (71) |
>3x ULN–5x ULN |
1 (0.6) |
1 (5.9) |
3 (1.8) |
1 (5.6) |
6 (3.4) |
1 (14) |
>5x ULN |
– |
– |
– |
– |
1 (0.6) |
– |
Missing |
– |
– |
1 (0.6) |
– |
2 (1.1) |
– |
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
Baseline |
|||
AST |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN n=8 (4.4%)a |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
|
|
||
LLN–ULN |
147 (86) |
2 (25) |
132 (75) |
1 (25) |
125 (72) |
1 (11) |
>ULN–3x ULN |
24 (14) |
6 (75) |
42 (24) |
3 (75) |
39 (23) |
7 (78) |
>3x ULN–5x ULN |
– |
– |
2 (1.1) |
– |
6 (3.5) |
1 (11) |
>5x ULN |
– |
– |
– |
– |
1 (0.6) |
– |
Missing |
– |
– |
1 (0.6) |
– |
2 (1.2) |
– |
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
Baseline |
|||
Total bilirubin |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
|
|
||
LLN–ULN |
164 (97) |
– |
163 (93) |
– |
150 (88) |
– |
>ULN–1.5x ULN |
4 (2.4) |
– |
9 (5.1) |
– |
13 (7.6) |
– |
>1.5x ULN–2x ULN |
– |
– |
2 (1.1) |
– |
4 (2.4) |
– |
>2x ULN |
1 (0.6) |
– |
– |
– |
2 (1.2) |
– |
Missing |
– |
n/a |
1 (0.6) |
n/a |
1 (0.6) |
1 (100) |
|
Baseline |
Baseline |
Baseline |
|||
AP |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
LLN–ULN |
>ULN |
Maximum on-treatment value, n (%)b |
|
|
|
|
||
LLN–ULN |
146 (87) |
– |
149 (94) |
9 (39) |
141 (91) |
12 (41) |
>ULN–1.5x ULN |
18 (11) |
12 (86) |
6 (3.8) |
11 (48) |
11 (7.1) |
12 (41) |
>1.5x ULN |
3 (1.8) |
2 (14) |
2 (1.3) |
3 (13) |
1 (0.6) |
5 (17) |
Missing |
– |
– |
1 (0.6) |
– |
2 (1.3) |
– |
Patients with baseline value <LLN (all LFTs) or missing (total bilirubin or AP) are not shown; apercentage of treatment group; bpercentage of baseline category within treatment group; n/a, not applicable. LLN, lower limit of normal |
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Tesser J, St. John G, Kimura T, Fiore S, Rischmueller M, Maldonado-Cocco JA, Braun J, Kaine J. Liver Function Test Levels with Sarilumab Treatment in Phase 3 Trials: Analysis By Baseline Liver Function Test (LFT) Level [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/liver-function-test-levels-with-sarilumab-treatment-in-phase-3-trials-analysis-by-baseline-liver-function-test-lft-level/. Accessed .« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/liver-function-test-levels-with-sarilumab-treatment-in-phase-3-trials-analysis-by-baseline-liver-function-test-lft-level/