ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2235

Monosodium Urate Deposition Distribution in the Knees, Hands, and Feet of Treated Gout Patients: A Dual-Energy CT Study

Chio Yokose1, Nicola Dalbeth2, Savvas Nicolaou3, Scott Baumgartner4, Jia Hu5, Maple Fung4, F. Joseph Simeone6 and Hyon K. Choi1, 1Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 3Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Formerly Ardea Biosciences, San Diego, CA, 5Heron Therapeutics, San Diego, CA, 6Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: crystal-induced arthritis and gout, Imaging

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Prior studies have demonstrated that monosodium urate (MSU) deposits on dual-energy CT (DECT) are commonly found in joints as well as tendons of the feet and ankles of gout patients. However, no study has systematically evaluated the prevalence of MSU deposition in other joints or tendons, particularly in the knee joints. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of MSU deposition among multiple sites in the knees, feet/ankles, and hands/wrists among gout patients treated with urate-lowering therapy (ULT).

Methods:

Using standardized acquisition protocols, DECT of the bilateral feet/ankles, knees, and hands/wrists were obtained on 153 patients with a known diagnosis of gout and on allopurinol at a dose of at least 300mg daily for at least 3 months. The patients were prospectively recruited as a part of a non-interventional multi-center study conducted in the US and New Zealand. All patients met 1977 ARA gout classification criteria. The presence of MSU deposition was evaluated at 12 sites in the feet/ankles, 4 sites in the knees, and 15 sites in the hands/wrists by two radiologists familiar with DECT interpretation. To account for the larger number of sites in the feet/ankles and hands/wrists, they were then grouped into 4 sub-regions in the feet/ankles (first MTP, other toes, tarsals, tendons) and 3 sub-regions in the hands/wrists (IP joints, MCPs, carpals).

Results:

Among 153 gout patients (92% male) with mean duration of allopurinol therapy of 5 years and average allopurinol dose of 333mg daily, mean serum uric acid (SUA) was 6.1mg/dL and 51% of patients had SUA < 6mg/dL. The most commonly involved region was the feet/ankles followed closely by the knees; the hands/wrists had less MSU deposition (61%, 57%, and 23% respectively). The three most commonly affected sub-regions were the lateral tibiofemoral, patellofemoral, and medial tibiofemoral compartments of the knees (42%, 39%, and 37% respectively), followed by the first MTP joint (35%) (Table). The prevalence in the cruciate ligaments was similar to that of Achilles tendons (25% and 26%, respectively).

Conclusion:

Among patients with gout on ULT, there was a considerable prevalence of MSU deposition in all three compartments and the cruciate ligament of the knee joint. While these findings could reflect the higher frequency of involvement at these sites, they may also reflect larger volume MSU deposits in the knees which takes longer to resolve on ULT. DECT of the knees adds substantial value when assessing MSU burden and response to therapy among treated gout patients.

Table – Prevalence of MSU deposits

Anatomical Locations

Prevalence

N = 153 patients

Prevalence

N = 306 joints

Lateral tibiofemoral compartment

42%

34%

Patellofemoral compartment

39%

32%

Medial tibiofemoral compartment

37%

28%

First MTP

35%

25%

Achilles tendon

26%

19%

Cruciate ligament

25%

17%

Other toes

17%

12%

Tarsals

13%

11%

Carpals

14%

9%

MCPs

7%

5%

Hand IPs

5%

3%

MTP = metatarsophalangeal joint; MCP = metacarpophalangeal joint; IP = interphalangeal joint

 


Disclosure: C. Yokose, None; N. Dalbeth, Horizon, 5,Kowa, 5,Amgen Inc., 2,AstraZeneca/Ironwood, 2,AbbVie Inc., 8,Pfizer, Inc., 8,Janssen, 8; S. Nicolaou, Siemens, 9; S. Baumgartner, Ardea Biosciences, 3; J. Hu, Heron Therapeutics, 3; M. Fung, Ardea Biosciences, 3; F. J. Simeone, None; H. K. Choi, Takeda, Selecta, Kowa, and Horizon, 5,Selecta and Horizon, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yokose C, Dalbeth N, Nicolaou S, Baumgartner S, Hu J, Fung M, Simeone FJ, Choi HK. Monosodium Urate Deposition Distribution in the Knees, Hands, and Feet of Treated Gout Patients: A Dual-Energy CT Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/monosodium-urate-deposition-distribution-in-the-knees-hands-and-feet-of-treated-gout-patients-a-dual-energy-ct-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/monosodium-urate-deposition-distribution-in-the-knees-hands-and-feet-of-treated-gout-patients-a-dual-energy-ct-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology