ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 458

Validation of the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Classification Criteria Compared to the 1997 Acr Criteria and 2017 Candidate Weighted Criteria for Lupus in Pediatric Patients

Meiqian Ma1, Jane Cerise2, B. Anne Eberhard3 and Joyce Hui-Yuen4, 1Pediatric Rheumatology, Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, Lake Success, NY, 2Biostatistics, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 3Pediatric Rheumatology, Cohen Children's Medical center, Lake Success, NY, 4Pediatric Rheumatology, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Lake Success, NY

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: classification criteria, pediatrics and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Validity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster I: Lupus, Sjögren’s Disease, and Myositis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Different classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been proposed over many years. The most widely used and accepted criteria have been the 1997 ACR criteria. In 2012, the SLICC criteria were published in an attempt to improve clinical relevance of SLE criteria and address concerns with the 1997 ACR criteria. In 2017, a new candidate weighted criteria were proposed at the ACR meeting that included entry criteria. Our aim was to validate the 2012 SLICC criteria compared to 1997 ACR and 2017 weighted criteria for SLE in pediatric-onset SLE.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients with a clinical diagnosis of SLE diagnosed before the age of 19 years at our tertiary care center between 2002 and 2017. The ACR and SLICC classification criteria were applied to these patients. The 2017 weighted criteria were also applied for patients diagnosed after October 2014 as this was the date our laboratory began using the ANA Hep2 assay, which is an entry criterion for the new weighted criteria. We excluded patients diagnosed at another center and those for whom no records were available for review. All criteria sets were compared against a gold standard of physician diagnosis. Autoimmune controls were defined as patients who were referred for serologies positive for ANA but who did not fulfill criteria for diagnosis of SLE at the initial visit, or were diagnosed with another autoimmune disease.

Results: There were 150 patients (82% female) who were diagnosed with SLE over the past 15 years. The mean age at diagnosis was 13±2.7 years, with 23% Asian, 28% Black, 26% White, and 26% Caucasian, and 23% Other; 24% also identified as Hispanic. The sensitivity for the 1997 ACR criteria was 90.3 (CI: 0.84-0.95) and specificity was 95.9 (CI: 0.90-0.99). The sensitivity for the 2012 SLICC criteria was 99.3 (CI: 0.96-0.99) and specificity was 95.7 (CI: 0.90-0.99). The 2017 weighted criteria did not produce significant results as the patient sample size compared was too small.

Conclusion: The 2012 SLICC criteria were more sensitive than, but with similar specificity as, the 1997 ACR criteria. These findings are comparable with the observed statistics seen in the adult population. Further patient samples are needed to determine the test characteristics for the new weighted candidate criteria.


Disclosure: M. Ma, None; J. Cerise, None; B. A. Eberhard, None; J. Hui-Yuen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ma M, Cerise J, Eberhard BA, Hui-Yuen J. Validation of the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Classification Criteria Compared to the 1997 Acr Criteria and 2017 Candidate Weighted Criteria for Lupus in Pediatric Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-the-2012-systemic-lupus-international-collaborating-clinics-slicc-classification-criteria-compared-to-the-1997-acr-criteria-and-2017-candidate-weighted-criteria-for-lupus-in-pedia/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-the-2012-systemic-lupus-international-collaborating-clinics-slicc-classification-criteria-compared-to-the-1997-acr-criteria-and-2017-candidate-weighted-criteria-for-lupus-in-pedia/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology