ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 13L

Significant, Sustained Improvement in Knee Function after Intra-Articular TPX-100: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multi-Center, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial

Dawn McGuire1, Nancy E Lane2, Neil Segal3, Samy Metyas4, Hans Richard Barthel5, Meghan Miller1, David Rosen1 and Yoshi Kumagai1, 1OrthoTrophix, Inc, Oakland, CA, 2UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, 3University of Kansas, Shawnee, KS, 4Medvin Clinical Research, Covina, CA, 5Barthel Clinic, Santa Barbara, CA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: October 19, 2017

Keywords: Clinical research, clinical trials, drug treatment and osteoarthritis, Knee, Late-Breaking 2017

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: ACR Late-Breaking Abstract Poster

Session Type: ACR Late-breaking Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The current Phase 2 study was designed to evaluate safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of TPX-100 by IA administration in subjects with mild to moderate patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) involving both knees. TPX-100, a 23-amino acid peptide derived from Matrix Extracellular Phosphoglycoprotein (MEPE), has been shown to induce articular cartilage proliferation and improve healing after experimental injury in large and small animal models after IA administration. A unique feature of this clinical trial was the use of each subject as his/her own control, intended to minimize effects of age, sex, genetic factors, and activity levels that can complicate inter-subject comparisons. Knee-specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used in this study, including the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), were recorded separately for left and right knees.

Methods: Adult men and women with bilateral PFOA (ICRS grade 1-3, confirmed by screening MRI) were enrolled at 15 sites. One knee was randomly assigned to receive TPX-100 for 4 weekly injections, while the contralateral knee (control) received identical placebo (saline) injections. Investigator, subject, site and sponsor were blinded as to treatment assignment. The study had two parts: in Part A, 4 dose cohorts (n=6-9 subjects/cohort; 20, 50, 100 and 200mg/injection) were enrolled. Safety/tolerability of each cohort was evaluated by a Safety Review Committee (SRC) before the next cohort was enrolled. There were no dose-limiting toxicities or safety concerns at any dose, and the 200 mg dose was selected dose for Part B of the study.

Results: A total of 118 subjects (236 knees) were enrolled, 29 in Part A and 89 in Part B. The study population was fairly representative of the knee OA population in the U.S. regarding age (median 60 years) and Body Mass Index (29.2). There were no drug-related SAEs and no dose-limiting toxicities across doses from 20-200 mg/injection. Common adverse events such as knee pain had virtually identical incidences in control and TPX-100-treated knees. Efficacy results were based on the “per-protocol” population of 93 subjects (186 knees) who received 4 weekly injections of 200mg TPX-100 (from Part A or Part B) in the knee randomly assigned to active drug and had at least one MRI after baseline. Quantitative MRI revealed no measurable between-knee differences in cartilage thickness or volume at 6 or 12 months. However, statistically significant (P<.05) and clinically meaningful differences, per literature criteria, in knee function were demonstrated in favor of TPX-100-treated knees compared with controls at 6 and 12 months, including activities of daily living, sports activities, and knee-related quality of life, and a significant reduction in pain going up or down stairs. Subjects’ use of analgesics, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, declined markedly during the study. Results will be provided in detail.

Conclusion: Improving the functional status of patients with knee OA is a central therapeutic goal of OA treatment. In the present proof-of-concept study, TPX-100, administered in 4 weekly intra-articular injections, was safe and associated with robust functional benefits for up to 12 months.


Disclosure: D. McGuire, OrthoTrophix, Inc, 3; N. E. Lane, OrthoTrophix, 9; N. Segal, OrthoTrophix, 9; S. Metyas, OrthoTrophix, 9; H. R. Barthel, OrthoTrophix, 9; M. Miller, OrthoTrophix, Inc, 3; D. Rosen, OrthoTrophix, Inc, 3; Y. Kumagai, Ortho rophix, Inc, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McGuire D, Lane NE, Segal N, Metyas S, Barthel HR, Miller M, Rosen D, Kumagai Y. Significant, Sustained Improvement in Knee Function after Intra-Articular TPX-100: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multi-Center, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/significant-sustained-improvement-in-knee-function-after-intra-articular-tpx-100-a-double-blind-randomized-multi-center-placebo-controlled-phase-2-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/significant-sustained-improvement-in-knee-function-after-intra-articular-tpx-100-a-double-blind-randomized-multi-center-placebo-controlled-phase-2-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology