ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2902

Inflammatory Arthritis Due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Persistent Problem Requiring Immunosuppression

Laura Cappelli1, Clifton O. Bingham III2 and Ami A. Shah3, 1Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 2Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 3Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Arthritis, arthritis management and cancer treatments, Immunotherapy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases II

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an important treatment for advanced malignancies. ICIs are a form of immunotherapy which block negative co-stimulation of T-cells, thereby causing generalized immune activation. De novo inflammatory arthritis (IA) is a potential consequence of ICI use, but there is limited information to guide management of this often severe immune-related adverse event.

Methods: We evaluated clinical data from our longitudinal cohort of patients with ICI-induced IA. Patients with rheumatologist-confirmed IA occurring during or after ICI treatment with no prior history of IA or other systemic autoimmune disease were included. Patients were excluded if they were missing initial joint counts/description of clinical phenotype, or their ICI agent was unknown (e.g. blinded clinical trial). Data was analyzed by ICI treatment regimen to evaluate for differences in presentation and treatment response.

Results: Of the 31 patients included, 18 received anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy, 13 received anti-CTLA-4/anti-PD-1 combination therapy and none received anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy (table 1). Median age was 59, and 41.9% were female. Melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer were the most common tumors. Eighty-four percent (26/31) required systemic immunosuppression (corticosteroids, DMARDs). The other 5 patients received NSAIDs and intra-articular steroids. Initial joint involvement and CRP differed significantly by treatment regimen; those treated with combination therapy had higher CRP levels and were less likely to have initial small joint involvement. All cases of reactive arthritis (arthritis plus urethritis/conjunctivitis) were in the combination therapy group. Six patients received therapy with TNF-inhibitors (TNF-i), 4 received methotrexate, and 1 received leflunomide. Of those treated with TNFi, 4 had a persistent anti-tumor response to ICIs, and none lost the response while on TNF-inhibition. Duration of treatment with TNFi ranged from 2-21 months. 3-month follow up data was available on 20 patients after cessation of ICIs (7 still on therapy, 4 died/lost to follow up). Of these 18 had continued IA symptoms requiring treatment.

Conclusion: Baseline clinical features of ICI-induced IA differ by ICI regimen, specifically CRP levels, initial joints affected, and presence of the reactive arthritis triad. The majority of patients referred to rheumatology required systemic immunosuppression to manage their IA symptoms. Tumor progression was not seen in patients requiring TNFi.

Table 1: Demographic and clinical features for entire cohort and by ICI treatment regimen

Variable

All patients (n = 31)

PD-1/PD-L1 mono Rx (n=18)

Combination CTLA-4/ PD-1 Rx (n=13)

p-value*

Age: median (IQR)

59 (54-68)

62 (55-73)

57 (45-59)

0.02

Female sex: N (%)

13 (41.9%)

10 (55.6%)

3 (23.1%)

0.07

Tumor Type: N (%)

Melanoma: 8 (25.8%)

NSCLC: 12 (38.7%)

Other: 11 (35.5%)

Melanoma: 2 (11.1%)

NSCLC: 9 (50%)

Other: 7 (38.9%)

Melanoma: 6 (46.2%)

NSCLC: 3 (23.1%)

Other: 4 (30.8%)

0.08

Partial/complete tumor response: N (%)

(Total N=27)

Yes: 17 (63%)

Yes: 9 (64.2%)

Yes: 8 (61.5%)

0.60

Additional IRAE present: N (%)

Yes: 22 (71%)

Yes: 11 (84.6%)

Yes: 11 (61.1%)

0.36

First joint/s affected: N (%)

Knee: 16 (51.6%)

Other large: 7 (22.6%)

Small joint/s: 8 (25.8%)

Knee: 7 (38.9%)

Other large: 3 (16.7%)

Small joint/s: 8 (44.4%)

Knee: 9 (69.2%)

Other large: 4 (30.8%)

Small joint/s: 0 (0%)

0.01

# Swollen joints: median (IQR)

7 (4-10)

8.5 (5-11)

5 (4-7)

0.41

Reactive arthritis triad:

N (%)

3 (9.7%)

0 (0%)

3 (23%)

0.10

CRP (mg/dL) median (IQR)

1.5 (0.2-7.2)

0.7 (0.2-3.3)

4.8 (2.5-9.2)

0.02

Required systemic corticosteroids: N (%)

26 (84%)

14 (77.8%)

12 (92.3%)

0.33

Required additional immunosuppression: N (%)

10 (32.3%)

3 (16.7%)

7 (53.9%)

0.09

Persistent IA 3 months after ICI cessation: N (%)

(Total N= 20)

18 (90%)

8 (80%)

10 (100%)

0.47

*Comparison of PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy to combination therapy. Wilcoxon Rank Sum test used for continuous data and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical. Bold values indicate statistical significance. CRP: C-reactive protein


Disclosure: L. Cappelli, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2; C. O. Bingham III, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5; A. A. Shah, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cappelli L, Bingham III CO, Shah AA. Inflammatory Arthritis Due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Persistent Problem Requiring Immunosuppression [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inflammatory-arthritis-due-to-immune-checkpoint-inhibitors-a-persistent-problem-requiring-immunosuppression/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inflammatory-arthritis-due-to-immune-checkpoint-inhibitors-a-persistent-problem-requiring-immunosuppression/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology