ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2863

Serum Proteomic Signatures Predict Relapse in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Undergoing DMARD Withdrawal

Liam O'Neil1, Victor Spicer2, Carol A Hitchon2, Juergen Rech3, Axel J. Hueber4, John Wilkins2, Hani El-Gabalawy1 and Georg Schett3, 1Rheumatology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 3Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Internal Medicine 3 – Rheumatology and Immunology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany., Erlangen, Germany, 4Department of Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biomarkers, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects V: Predicting Treatment Response

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Early and targeted treatment strategies have led to increasing numbers of patients with RA achieving sustained clinical remission. If and when to taper Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) therapy is an emerging question for both clinicians and patients. Unfortunately, data on clinical, biochemical or imaging modalities that can reliably predict relapse following therapy withdrawal are limited to date. The objectives of our study were two-fold; first to generate unsupervised serum proteomic profiles using baseline samples from patients with RA in remission. We also aimed to identify serum biomarkers that predict relapse following DMARD withdrawal.

Methods: The RETRO (Reducing therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in ongoing Remission) study is a multicentre, randomized, prospective trial enrolling RA patients in sustained clinical remission (DAS28 2.6) to undergo DMARD withdrawal. 130 baseline serum samples from the RETRO study were analyzed using SOMAscan (SOMAlogic Inc.), allowing the generation of comparative quantitative levels of > 1300 proteins. Unsupervised clustering analysis was performed to identify subgroups of patients. Unique clusters were analyzed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (QIAGEN). Differentially expressed proteins between patients who relapsed, and those who remained in remission were combined to synthesize a predictive biomarker scoring algorithm. A multivariate logistic regression model that included seropositive status, current treatment, both disease and remission duration, and the biomarker score was used to analyze predictors of relapse.

Results: Unsupervised clustering analysis distinguished 4 unique subpopulations of patients. Compared to the remaining population, Cluster 3 (n = 14) had shorter disease duration (p = 0.012), higher seropositivity rates (p = 0.02) and no use of biologic DMARDs (p = 0.001). Cluster 3 had 145 proteins with significantly (p <0.05) reduced expression (log2 difference = 0.50 – 1.17) compared to the remaining population. Pathway analysis of these proteins suggested downregulation of Acute Phase Response signaling. Additionally, we created a predictive biomarker withdrawal score (SOMA score; range = 1.5 to 26.0) comprised of 8 unique biomarkers using our data. Patients failing DMARD withdrawal had higher mean SOMA scores compared to those who sustained remission (13.4 vs 8.0, p < 0.001). 83.7% of patients who failed withdrawal had scores greater than a cut off of 9.64, while only 25.6% of those remaining in remission had scores above this cut off. Multivariate regression analysis identified SOMA score as the only independent predictor for relapse after DMARD withdrawal (OR = 15.5, 4.5 – 53.4, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Unsupervised proteomic analysis of RA patients in sustained clinical remission generates distinct clusters of subpopulations. We discovered a unique protein signature in a group of patients who, despite being seropositive, achieved sustained clinical remission without requiring biologic therapy. We constructed a serum protein biomarker score that successfully predicts failure of DMARD withdrawal. Validation of our predictive score will be undertaken to assess its use as a clinical decision-making tool.


Disclosure: L. O'Neil, None; V. Spicer, None; C. A. Hitchon, None; J. Rech, None; A. J. Hueber, None; J. Wilkins, None; H. El-Gabalawy, None; G. Schett, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

O'Neil L, Spicer V, Hitchon CA, Rech J, Hueber AJ, Wilkins J, El-Gabalawy H, Schett G. Serum Proteomic Signatures Predict Relapse in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Undergoing DMARD Withdrawal [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/serum-proteomic-signatures-predict-relapse-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-undergoing-dmard-withdrawal/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/serum-proteomic-signatures-predict-relapse-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-undergoing-dmard-withdrawal/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology